Toggle light / dark theme

Get the latest international news and world events from around the world.

Log in for authorized contributors

Background static can carry wireless data without an actively generated radio signal

Stanford researchers recently revealed how a seemingly physics-defying wireless communication technology works. The new technology, called thermal noise communication, harnesses background static that normally is the bane of radio, cellular and other wireless signals. In their new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team showed how a transmitter could deliver data to a receiver without any actively produced signal by manipulating tiny oscillations in voltage.

The findings describe how the system works at a fundamental level, opening the door to improving the communication mode and determining real-world applications for it. “We’ve built a system that others could very easily implement,” said senior author Zerina Kapetanovic, an assistant professor of electrical engineering.

A physics mystery In her previous research at the University of Washington, Kapetanovic studied agricultural sensing technologies, which inspired her to pursue low-power modes of relaying data like soil moisture levels. She wondered if it might be possible to create a device similar to the radio-frequency identification (RFID) window tags that are used for highway tolls in cars—without requiring an energy-intensive radio signal to ping.

How Do You Defend a Space Colony? | Beyond Space Defense

In space, every ship, tug, mass driver, and power beam can become a weapon. We explore how future stations and settlements might defend themselves against attack, sabotage, accidents, and siege.

Explore A Dream Renewed: Space Settlement in the 21st Century: https://sfia.s.gy/a-dream-renewed.

🛒 SFIA Merchandise: https://isaac-arthur-shop.fourthwall… Visit our Website: http://www.isaacarthur.net ❤️ Support us on Patreon: / isaacarthur ⭐ Support us on Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/isaac-a… 👥 Facebook Group: / 1,583,992,725,237,264 📣 Reddit Community: / isaacarthur 🐦 Follow on Twitter / X: / isaac_a_arthur 💬 SFIA Discord Server: / discord Credits: Beyond Space Defense: War, Sabotage & Survival Beyond Earth Written, Produced & Narrated by: Isaac Arthur Music by Epidemic Sound: http://nebula.tv/epidemic Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images Table of Contents 0:00 Intro 2:45 The War We Already Have in Space 5:38 Fight Far From Home 8:30 The Perimeter 10:50 Everything Is a Potential Weapon 13:45 A Dream Renewed 14:59 Siege Without Shooting 17:38 The City Is Part of Your Spacesuit 22:07 The Hardest Target to Kill.
🌐 Visit our Website: http://www.isaacarthur.net.
❤️ Support us on Patreon: / isaacarthur.
⭐ Support us on Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/isaac-a…
👥 Facebook Group: / 1583992725237264
📣 Reddit Community: / isaacarthur.
🐦 Follow on Twitter / X: / isaac_a_arthur.
💬 SFIA Discord Server: / discord.
Credits:
Beyond Space Defense: War, Sabotage \& Survival Beyond Earth.
Written, Produced \& Narrated by: Isaac Arthur.
Music by Epidemic Sound: http://nebula.tv/epidemic.
Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images.

Table of Contents.
0:00 Intro.
2:45 The War We Already Have in Space.
5:38 Fight Far From Home.
8:30 The Perimeter.
10:50 Everything Is a Potential Weapon.
13:45 A Dream Renewed.
14:59 Siege Without Shooting.
17:38 The City Is Part of Your Spacesuit.
22:07 The Hardest Target to Kill.

Establishing a Biophotonic Signature of Brain Ageing

In this study, we aimed to define ageing-related changes in microglial autofluorescence in the hippocampus and ARC, and whether these were associated with spectral and lifetime signatures that can be identified with plasma lipid profiles. First, we established that our mice had a typical ageing brain phenotype. As shown in previous literature, this is marked by reduced numbers of immature neurons, greater microglia numbers, and greater tissue autofluorescence in the brain (Culig et al. 2022 ; Wong 2013), all of which we recapitulate here. Similar to previous studies in rodents and humans, we also see ageing-related changes to central expression of genes indicative of disease-associated states, or at least inflammaging, including genes relating to inflammation (Itgam, Tlr4, Mhc-II, Aif1), Alzheimer’s disease (Sorl1, Mapt, Abca7), and lipid pathways (Hexb, Ch25h, Lpl) (Boche and Gordon 2022 ; Kim 2018 ; Long et al. 2022).

In association with this typical and well-established ageing-brain profile, we revealed that ageing brains have a propensity to accumulate larger-sized aggregates in all hippocampal regions assessed (DG, CA1, and CA3) and the ARC. When assessing the emission spectra of autofluorescence aggregates of varying sizes in young and aged brains, we identified consistent eight spectral peaks common to both age groups. Notably, the red-shifted intensity ratio we observed consistently distinguished aged from young brains, suggesting the potential utility of an overall emission spectral shift as a future spectral biomarker of ageing. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically compare spectral autofluorescence signatures between young and aged brains. We also found that aged tissue exhibited consistently shorter intensity-weighted average lifetimes across all three detection windows compared with young tissue, indicating altered autofluorescence decay dynamics with age. Supporting this interpretation, a previous study examining autofluorescent inclusions in female APPswe: PS1dE9 transgenic mice reported that both plaque-surrounding and plaque-free cells displayed shorter autofluorescence lifetimes than their wild-type counterparts (Gómez et al. 2018). This suggests that changes in autofluorescence lifetime reflect systemic neurodegenerative physiological alterations and are not solely attributable to the presence of disease-specific markers such as amyloid-beta plaques.

One working hypothesis is that these differences likely reflect fundamental physiological changes that accompany ageing. With advancing age, increasing iron accumulation promotes reactive oxygen species formation, which in turn drives lipid peroxidation and the buildup of cross-linked, undegradable biomaterials within lysosomal and autophagosomal compartments of post-mitotic cells (as reviewed in (Yin 1996)). Defective lysosomal acidification–a hallmark of both ageing and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s (Lo and Zeng 2023)–further impairs autophagic clearance, exacerbating the accumulation of autofluorescent material (Escrevente et al. 2021). Collectively, these processes may illustrate how ageing-related alterations in cellular maintenance mechanisms, particularly lysosomal and autophagic dysfunction, can create a self-perpetuating cycle of oxidative stress and impaired degradation that underlies the pathogenesis of ageing-related diseases.

🌌 Quantum Immortality: Can You Always Survive In Another Branch? 🔬 Many-Worlds Interpretation, Consciousness & The Limits Of Quantum Theory Imagine A Universe In Which Every Quantum Measurement Can Be Described Through Multiple Alternative Outcomes

Could There Always Be A Branch In Which You Survive? And Would Your Consciousness Necessarily Continue Experiencing That Branch? This Fascinating Question Introduces One Of The Most Controversial Thought Experiments Associated With Quantum Mechanics: Quantum Immortality. But Does Modern Physics Actually Predict That Human Beings Can Never Experience Their Own Death? The Scientific Answer Is That Quantum Immortality Has Not Been Demonstrated, And Quantum Mechanics Does Not Establish Guaranteed Personal Survival. Let Us Examine The Physics Behind This Extraordinary Idea. ⚛️ 1. Quantum Superposition — Multiple Possible Outcomes In Quantum Mechanics, A Physical System Can Exist In A Superposition Of Different States Before Measurement. For A Two-State System, We May Write: |ψ⟩ = α|0⟩ + β|1⟩ Where: |α|² + |β|² = 1 The Squared Magnitudes Of The Probability Amplitudes Determine The Probabilities Of Corresponding Measurement Outcomes. However, Quantum Superposition Does Not Mean That Every Human Decision Automatically Creates Another Universe. 🌌 2. Many-Worlds Interpretation — Does Reality Branch? The Many-Worlds Interpretation, Proposed By Physicist Hugh Everett III In 1957, Offers An Interpretation Of Quantum Mechanics Without Fundamental Wavefunction Collapse. Within This Framework, The Universal Quantum State Continues Evolving According To Quantum Dynamics. Different Measurement Outcomes Become Associated With Effectively Distinct Branches. However, Many-Worlds Remains An Interpretation, Not An Experimentally Confirmed Description Of Multiple Accessible Universes. It Does Not Predict That People Can Travel Between Branches. 🌊 3. Quantum Decoherence — Why Branches Appear Separate Quantum Systems Interact With Their Environments. These Interactions Produce Decoherence, Suppressing Observable Interference Between Different Components Of A Quantum State. Decoherence Helps Explain Why Classical-Looking Outcomes Emerge From Quantum Dynamics. But Decoherence Does Not Demonstrate That Consciousness Can Move Between Alternative Realities. Nor Does It Establish Quantum Immortality. 🧠 4. Quantum Immortality — The Consciousness Problem The Quantum Immortality Argument Is Associated With A Controversial Thought Experiment Often Called Quantum Suicide. Its Central Speculation Concerns Whether Subjective Experience Could Continue Only Along Branches In Which An Observer Remains Alive. However, This Argument Requires Additional Assumptions About Consciousness, Personal Identity, And Observer Experience. No Established Scientific Theory Demonstrates That Awareness Must Continue In A Surviving Branch. The Existence Of A Possible Survival Outcome Does Not Establish That An Individual Is Guaranteed To Experience It. 📊 5. Probability & The Born Rule — Why Branch Weights Matter Quantum Mechanics Does Not Assign Equal Probabilities To Every Possible Outcome. The Born Rule Relates Measurement Probabilities To Squared Quantum Amplitudes. Within Many-Worlds, Explaining The Meaning And Derivation Of These Probabilities Is An Important Foundational Question. Even If A Surviving Branch Exists In A Particular Quantum Description, That Does Not Make Survival Certain. Possibility Is Not The Same As Probability, And Probability Is Not The Same As Certainty. 🔍 6. The Scientific Verdict — Is Quantum Immortality Real? Quantum Immortality Has Not Been Experimentally Verified. There Is No Established Evidence That Consciousness Transfers Between Quantum Branches. There Is No Demonstrated Physical Mechanism Guaranteeing Endless Subjective Survival. And There Is No Scientific Justification For Treating Human Mortality As An Illusion. The Many-Worlds Interpretation Raises Important Questions About Reality, Measurement, Probability, And The Nature Of Observation. But Those Questions Must Not Be Confused With Proof Of Immortality. 💡 Why Is This Topic Scientifically Important? Quantum Immortality Encourages Us To Examine The Difference Between Mathematical Possibility And Physical Prediction. It Also Raises Deeper Questions: 🔹 What Does A Quantum Measurement Actually Mean? 🔹 How Does Decoherence Produce Effectively Classical Outcomes? 🔹 How Should Probability Be Understood Within Many-Worlds? 🔹 What Determines Personal Identity Across Hypothetical Branches? 🔹 Can Subjective Experience Be Explained Through Established Physical Principles? These Questions Remain Relevant To Quantum Foundations, Philosophy Of Physics, And The Scientific Study Of Consciousness. ⚠️ An Essential Scientific And Safety Clarification Quantum Immortality Provides No Basis For Taking Life-Threatening Risks. The Thought Experiment Does Not Demonstrate That Dangerous Actions Are Survivable Or That Death Can Be Avoided. Real-World Safety Must Never Be Compromised By Speculative Interpretations Of Quantum Mechanics. 🌠 Our Final Scientific Takeaway The Many-Worlds Interpretation Does Not Establish That Consciousness Transfers Between Branches Or That Any Individual Is Immortal. Quantum Immortality Is A Fascinating Philosophical And Scientific Thought Experiment, But It Is Not An Established Prediction Of Quantum Physics. The Real Scientific Achievement Lies In Understanding What Quantum Mechanics Demonstrates, What Its Interpretations Propose, And What Remains Unknown. Science Becomes More Powerful When We Clearly Distinguish Evidence From Speculation. 📚 Scientific Note: This Post Is Intended For Physics Education. It Discusses A Speculative Thought Experiment And Does Not Present Quantum Immortality As A Verified Scientific Phenomenon. 🎥 YouTube Channel: Quaint Cosmos 🌍 Motto: RESPECT EVERY CULTURE. EXPLORE EVERY TECHNOLOGY. 📱 WhatsApp: (+91) 7,449,707,694 #QuantumImmortality #QuantumMechanics #ManyWorldsInterpretation #QuantumDecoherence #QuantumPhysics #Consciousness #ScienceEducation #QuaintCosmos

Planck and the consciousness puzzle

Most of us, scientists included, see physics as an attempt to provide an objective description of the world independent of human subjectivity and consciousness. Yet, Max Planck, one of major scientific figures of the twentieth century and the founder of quantum mechanics, stated as a result of his investigations and experiments: “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness.” Should we listen to Planck? Can we plausibly see matter as derivative of consciousness? Might doing so help solve the deep puzzles facing contemporary physics and overcome the ‘hard problem of consciousness’ itself? Or does this outlook, as Einstein argued, undermine the very success and objectivity of science and take us back to a world of superstition?

Investigational vaccine generates immune response to KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer study

ROCHESTER, Minn. — An investigational vaccine helped the immune system recognize and respond to mutations that drive most pancreatic cancers, according to results from a randomized phase 2 clinical trial led by Mayo Clinic researchers. The findings, published in Nature Medicine, will help researchers design a larger phase 3 clinical trial.

Nearly every patient evaluated after receiving the vaccine developed an immune response against mutated KRAS, a gene that plays a major role in pancreatic cancer. Mayo Clinic researchers also found that patients with stronger immune responses tended to remain free of disease longer.

“Historically, pancreatic cancer has been very difficult to treat with immunotherapy,” says Ben George, M.B.B.S, M.D., a Mayo Clinic medical oncologist and lead author of the study. “What is encouraging is that we were able to generate a strong immune response against KRAS mutations in nearly every patient we evaluated. In an exploratory analysis, patients with greater immune responses to the vaccine appeared protected with longer disease-free survival times.”

Scientists discover new Alzheimer’s drug that repairs DNA damage and reduces brain inflammation

Scientists have discovered that a drug originally developed for spinal cord injuries can tackle several key features of Alzheimer’s disease, including DNA damage and inflammation. Already tested for initial safety in humans, the experimental treatment could offer a faster path toward therapies that target the disease at its roots.