The idea that information should flow freely is deeply embedded in the design of social media. The assumption is that the more information is produced and shared, the better. However, simulations by a team of scientists including University of Groningen Professor of Artificial Intelligence Davide Grossi show that such an unrestricted flow of information can amplify incorrect ideas among like-minded people. The study is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Information sharing is always beneficial. That is the central premise of digital communication platforms. If users want to communicate with one another, no amount of shared information is too much. But is this central premise correct? A team of social scientists and computer scientists used digital agents that shared unlimited information with perfect honesty to study how this affected the development of correct and incorrect ideas.








