Toggle light / dark theme

The nocebo effect: How prior experience and verbal suggestion rewire the brain to make pain worse

Researchers have a better understanding of the nocebo effect and the neuroscience behind it all. Opposite of the better-known placebo effect, where positive expectations trigger genuine pain relief, the nocebo effect is the experience from negative expectations, created by prior experience, verbal suggestion, or social observation, which can drive anxiety and make pain worse.

A new study published in Nature Communications, by researchers at the University of Toronto Mississauga and McGill University, identified a brain pathway through which negative expectations can amplify pain. The findings, generated independently by the two labs without prior coordination, converged on the neurochemical cholecystokinin (CCK), which has previously been linked to nocebo pain responses in humans.

The researchers identified a specific brain pathway through which CCK acts, traveling from the brain’s anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a region involved in the emotional dimensions of pain, to a midbrain structure called the lateral periaqueductal gray (lPAG), where it increases pain sensitivity.

BI 109 Mark Bickhard: Interactivism

Patreon support: / braininspired.

Free Video Series: Open Questions in AI and Neuroscience:
https://braininspired.co/open/

Show notes: https://braininspired.co/podcast/109/

Mark and I discuss a wide range of topics surrounding his Interactivism framework for explaining cognition. Interactivism stems from Mark’s account of representations and how what we represent in our minds is related to the external world — a challenge that has plagued the mind-body problem since the beginning. Basically, representations are anticipated interactions with the world, that can be true (if enacting one helps an organism maintain its thermodynamic relation with the world) or false (if it doesn’t). And representations are functional, in that they function to maintain far from equilibrium thermodynamics for the organism for self-maintenance. Over the years, Mark has filled out Interactivism, starting with a process metaphysics foundation and building from there to account for representations, how our brains might implement representations, and why AI is hindered by our modern \.

Consciousness Beyond the Brain & Self | Michael Levin Λ Anna Ciaunica

In this episode, developmental biologist Michael Levin and cognitive scientist Anna Ciaunica examine how cellular intelligence challenges our traditional understanding of consciousness. They explore how memory, embodiment, and our interactions with others fundamentally shape the self.

A huge thank you to Dina Rudick, a four-time Emmy award-winning documentary filmmaker / journalist, who expertly aided this production at the last minute. You can find more about her work at https://www.anthemmultimedia.com. Definitely check out her films.

I personally subscribe to The Economist. TOE listeners get 35% off the annual subscription. No other podcast has this! https://economist.com/TOE

Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com.

Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/SpotifyTOE

Philosophy Talks 26: Emergence in Process — Prof. Mark H. Bickhard

Date of the talk: 13th November 2024

Abstract:
Emergence can (potentially) integrate across otherwise dual metaphysics of basic substances or atoms on one hand and higher ‘level’ phenomena, including mental phenomena, on the other. But there are strong arguments against the possibility of emergence, such as from Jaegwon Kim. I will argue that such arguments against emergence assume a metaphysics of ‘atoms’ (particles); that that metaphysics is false; that an alternative is a metaphysics of process; and that process metaphysics makes the possibility of emergence coherent and ubiquitous.

FULL SPEECH: Anthropic Co-Founder Warns AI Could Replace Human Jobs “At Very Large Scale” | AI1G

Anthropic Co-Founder Chris Olah warned that artificial intelligence could displace human labor “at very large scale” as he addressed the Vatican during the presentation of Pope Leo’s first encyclical on AI. The Anthropic co-founder urged stronger oversight from governments, religious leaders, and civil society, while raising concerns about AI’s growing power, global inequality, and mysterious internal behaviors observed in advanced systems.

Anthropic Co-Founder Warns AI Could Replace Human Jobs “At Very Large Scale”
Chris Olah Sounds Alarm Over AI Risks During Major Vatican Address.
“AI Could Displace Human Labour” — Anthropic Founder Issues Stark Warning.

Anthropic, Chris Olah, artificial intelligence, AI jobs, AI risks, Vatican, Pope Leo XIV, AI ethics, machine learning, AI labor displacement, generative AI, technology news, AI regulation, future of work, AI safety, global inequality, neuroscience, AI research, world news, tech news.

Live from Vatican City: Pope Leo participates in the presentation of his first major encyclical focused on the rise of artificial intelligence, marking a rare break from papal tradition.
Real-time coverage of this significant Vatican event with DRM News.

Pope Leo, AI encyclical, Vatican encyclical, Pope Leo AI, artificial intelligence Vatican, papal document AI, Pope Leo speech, Vatican City event, Catholic Church AI, papal tradition, first encyclical Leo, ethics of AI, technology and faith, Pope on AI, Vatican presentation, religious document AI, global ethics, Pope Leo 2026.

#PopeLeo #AIEncyclical #Vatican #ArtificialIntelligence #PopeOnAI #Encyclical #CatholicChurch #VaticanCity #LiveFromVatican #FaithAndTech #AIethics #DRMNews.

Joscha Bach on Synthetic Consciousness & Computational Mind

The provided text outlines Joscha Bach theories regarding the nature of synthetic consciousness and the limitations of modern science. Bach posits that human experience is not a direct interaction with reality, but rather a simulated world model constructed by the brain internal software. He defines intelligence as the capacity to build these models in novel environments, suggesting that current artificial intelligence remains incomplete because it lacks genuine self-understanding. Furthermore, he challenges the narrow focus of contemporary academia and traditional neuroscience, arguing that minds are complex information-processing systems that cannot be explained by neural connections alone. Ultimately, these sources present a computational framework for understanding the self as a functional narrative rather than a mystical or purely physical entity.

Your brain doesn’t forget when you forgive—it does something far more surprising with those painful memories

Forgiving someone might not erase painful memories, but it can subtly update them, making past hurts feel less upsetting. It’s less “forgive and forget,” and more “forgive and update.”

Psychologists have long known that forgiveness is crucial for healing rifts and keeping social bonds strong. Folk wisdom even advises us to “forgive and forget” after a wrong, implying that saying you forgive someone should make the bad memory vanish.

But forgiving doesn’t actually make you forget, notes Duke neuroscientist Felipe de Brigard: “When you forgive someone for a wrongdoing, you don’t forget the event. But once you forgive, the memory doesn’t hurt as much.” Indeed, past studies hinted that forgiving someone can blunt the memory of their misdeed. What hasn’t been clear is how that happens in the brain. Is the memory simply erased, or does it get rewritten?

Childhood trauma predicts higher risk of combined mental and physical illness in later life

Researchers modeled the specific dosage of trauma to highlight an escalating relationship between the sheer volume of trauma and later health vulnerabilities. Small amounts of childhood adversity corresponded to relatively modest increases in health risks. However, once a person’s trauma score passed four distinct adverse experiences, the upward trajectory of their health risk accelerated rapidly.

The researchers also investigated the stepping stones connecting early trauma to later disease onset. Using a statistical technique called mediation analysis, they looked for intermediate health issues that acted as bridges over the span of a lifetime. They found that developing either a single physical illness or isolated depression in early adulthood often served as an indirect pathway to combined disease in older age.

For individuals with the highest amounts of early trauma, early-onset depression played a particularly strong bridging role. An initial diagnosis of depression frequently paved the way for additional physical conditions as time went on. These findings align with biological theories suggesting that severe childhood stress permanently disrupts the body’s immune regulation and stress hormone pathways.

/* */