Lifeboat Foundation

Scientists studying Large Language Models (LLMs) have found that LLMs perform similarly to humans in cognitive tasks, often making judgments and decisions that deviate from rational norms, such as risk and loss aversion. LLMs also exhibit human-like biases and errors, particularly in probability judgments and arithmetic operations tasks. These similarities suggest the potential for using LLMs as models of human cognition. However, significant challenges remain, including the extensive data LLMs are trained on and the unclear origins of these behavioural similarities.

The suitability of LLMs as models of human cognition is debated due to several issues. LLMs are trained on much larger datasets than humans and may have been exposed to test questions, leading to artificial enhancements in human-like behaviors through value alignment processes. Despite these challenges, fine-tuning LLMs, such as the LLaMA-1-65B model, on human choice datasets has improved accuracy in predicting human behavior. Prior research has also highlighted the importance of synthetic datasets in enhancing LLM capabilities, particularly in problem-solving tasks like arithmetic. Pretraining on such datasets can significantly improve performance in predicting human decisions.

Researchers from Princeton University and Warwick University propose enhancing the utility of LLMs as cognitive models by (i) utilizing computationally equivalent tasks that both LLMs and rational agents must master for cognitive problem-solving and (ii) examining task distributions required for LLMs to exhibit human-like behaviors. Applied to decision-making, specifically risky and intertemporal choice, Arithmetic-GPT, an LLM pretrained on an ecologically valid arithmetic dataset, predicts human behavior better than many traditional cognitive models. This pretraining suffices to align LLMs closely with human decision-making.

They had to throw away most of what it produced but there was gold among the garbage.

It seems like over the past few years, Quantum is being talked about more and more. We’re hearing words like qubits, entanglement, super position, and quantum computing. But what does that mean … and is quantum science really that big of a deal? Yeah, it is.

It’s because Quantum science has the potential to revolutionize our world. From processing data to predicting weather, to picking stocks or even discovering new medical drugs. Quantum, specifically quantum computers, could solve countless problems.

Continue reading “Unlocking the Power of Quantum Computing” »

In an interview Dr Stephanie Simmons, Chief Quantum Officer of Photonic, explains the need to scale quantum computers and their approach to tackling this challenge to pave the way for reliable, large-scale quantum computing.

For quantum computers to move from laboratory to commercialization, these devices will need to scale to millions of qubits.

Scaling quantum computers is critical to unlocking exponential speed-ups to help solve some of the world’s biggest problems and unlock its greatest opportunities, said Stephanie Simmons, CQO of Photonic, a company focused on using its photonically linked spin qubits in silicon to build a scalable, fault-tolerant and distributed quantum system.

Perhaps.

This mashup of neuroscience, artificial intelligence and even linguistics and philosophy of mind aims to crack the deep question of what ‘understanding’ is, however un-brain-like its models may be.

Discover the power of neural network and deep learning, how they mimic the human brain, and their applications in artificial intelligence and machine learning.

The expansion of the universe has been a well-established fact of physics for almost a century. By the turn of the millennium the rate of this expansion, referred to as the Hubble constant (H ₀), had converged to a value of around 70 km s ^–1 Mpc ^–1. However, more recent measurements have given rise to a tension: whereas those derived from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) cluster around a value of 67 km s ^–1 Mpc ^–1, direct measurements using a local distance-ladder (such as those based on Cepheids) mostly prefer larger values around 73 km s ^–1 Mpc ^–1. This disagreement between early-and late-universe measurements, respectively, stands at the 4–5 σ level, thereby calling for novel measurements.

One such source of new information are large galaxy surveys, such as the one currently being performed by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). This Arizona-based instrument uses 5,000 individual robots that optimise the focal plane of the detector to allow it to measure 5,000 galaxies at the same time. The goal of the survey is to provide a detailed 3D map, which can be used to study the evolution of the universe by focussing on the distance between galaxies. During its first year of observation, the results of which have now been released, DESI has provided a catalogue of millions of objects.

Small fluctuations in the density of the early universe resulted not only in signatures in the CMB, as measured for example by the Planck probe, but also left imprints in the distribution of baryonic matter. Each over-dense region is thought to contain dark matter, baryonic matter and photons. The gravitational force from dark matter on the baryons is countered by radiation pressure from the photons. From the small over-densities, baryons are dragged along by photon pressure until these two types of particles decoupled during the recombination era. The original location of the over-density is surrounded by a sphere of baryonic matter, which typically is at a distance referred to as the sound horizon. The sound horizon at the moment of decoupling, denoted r _d, leaves an imprint that has since evolved to produce the density fluctuations in the universe that seeded large-scale structures.

Hydrogen storage, heat conduction, gas storage, CO₂ and water sequestration—metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have extraordinary properties due to their unique structure in the form of microporous crystals, which have a very large surface area despite their small size. This makes them extremely interesting for research and practical applications. However, MOFs are very complex systems that have so far required a great deal of time and computing power to simulate accurately.

Recent MBZUAI Ph.D. graduate Hilal Mohammad Hilal AlQuabeh aims to raise the bar in AI by helping neural networks learn smarter.