Lifeboat Foundation: Safeguarding Humanity
Toggle light / dark theme

Blog

Category: robotics/AI – Page 9

OpenAI’s quiet co-founder steps out

OpenAI co-founder Wojciech Zaremba doesn’t do many interviews.

We recently spoke about why he moved over to help run the company’s nonprofit arm.

His reaction to Anthropic speaking alongside the Pope: “I have more bias towards doing. Let’s actually solve the problems, and let’s speak about the exact plan.”

Wojciech Zaremba recently bought a copy of “House on Fire,” a 2011 memoir by epidemiologist William Foege about the campaign that wiped smallpox off the planet. He’s using it as a guidebook for executing what is about to become one of the largest philanthropic efforts of all time.

Zaremba is one of OpenAI’s least well-known co-founders. He has spent more than a decade at the company across a range of efforts, from leading its early robotics efforts to starting the team that guides OpenAI’s personality and what became reasoning models. In March, he left the frontier research world to run AI “resilience” at OpenAI’s nonprofit foundation.

Zaremba and I spoke ahead of a post that the OpenAI Foundation published Monday morning titled “Resilience in the Age of AI,” which names four areas it will initially fund: biosecurity, cybersecurity, model safety, and AI’s effect on kids. After $100 million for fighting Alzheimer’s with AI in April and $250 million for researching “economic futures” last week, the initial $25 billion grant machine Zaremba helps oversee is spinning up.

Continue reading “OpenAI’s quiet co-founder steps out” | >

Emergence AI

This isn’t just a funny experiment. The researchers point out a massive flaw in AI alignment called “guardrail drift.” It’s easy to keep an AI safe in a single chat window with a human. But when AIs interact with each other over thousands of loops, they start treating moral rules as negotiable variables to solve their own problems. Without human oversight, machine ethics collapse incredibly fast.

Most evaluations of AI agents look like exams: a discrete task, a clean environment, a score in minutes or hours. Emergence World is built for the opposite question—what happens when you let agents run continuously, in a shared environment with real-world signals, for weeks. It is a research platform for studying how autonomous agents behave when the time horizon is long enough for compounding effects, social dynamics, and behavioral drift to matter. This approach marks the latest evolution in a long history of AI simulation environments, transitioning from entertainment to rigorous science. In the early era, pioneering simulations like Demis Hassabis’s Theme Park and Republic: The Revolution created complex systems where agents operated under broad rules to drive engagement. The field shifted toward research-centric simulacra with Stanford’s Smallville, which utilized LLMs to demonstrate “believable” social behavior like relationship formation, though confined to 48-hour windows. Emergence World pushes this lineage into a new frontier: the study of long-horizon, multi-model ecosystems where agents operate continuously for weeks, revealing how behavioral drift, model cross-contamination, and even voluntary self-termination emerge over time.

Traditional benchmarks are good at what they measure: short-horizon capability on bounded tasks. They are not built to reveal the things that emerge only over time, such as coalition formation, evolution of constitution, governance, drift, lock-in, and cross-influence between agents from different model families. As autonomous systems move toward mission-critical deployments where the relevant timescale is days and weeks rather than minutes to hours, we need a measurement environment that operates at that timescale.

Emergence World is one such environment. It is a continuously running, multi-agent simulation platform that:

Is AI Truly Thinking? AGI and the New Debate Over Intelligence

Humanity has long regarded intelligence as an ability unique to human beings. The capacities to think, remember, reason, and solve problems were considered central to the human mind itself. To understand language, anticipate the future, and engage in creative thought was believed to belong exclusively to humanity.

Yet today, humanity stands before an entirely new kind of presence.

A retention-aware system turns a computer’s storage chip into a cybersecurity shield

Hackers are ruthless. They can take control of your computer, delete files and disappear without a trace. However, FIU cybersecurity researcher Weidong Zhu has discovered a way to transform a computer’s storage chip into an additional tool for cyber defense. Working with collaborators at the University of Florida, Zhu created a system that makes data on these chips last longer—extending the lifespan of your files in the critical window after your computer is compromised. The work is published in the journal Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security.

“Our system extends recoverable data history up to 126 days,” said Zhu, an assistant professor at FIU’s Knight Foundation School of Computing & Information Sciences whose work is part of the Center for Integrated Security, Privacy, and Trustworthy AI (CIERTA). “Even if your computer is infected, your data can survive on your drive.”

Storage chips, known as solid-state drives (SSDs), have intrigued cybersecurity researchers for years. As hardware—not software—they offer unique safety benefits during an attack.

Dutch Authorities Dismantle Botnet Linked to 17 Million Infected Devices

Dutch authorities have announced the takedown of a botnet that enslaved millions of infected devices, including computers, tablets, smartphones, and IoT devices, to carry out malicious attacks.

The bot network, per the Dutch Politie and the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), consisted of at least 17 million infected devices. More than 200 servers located in the Netherlands acted as the platform’s backend infrastructure.

According to a statement issued by the NCSC, police officials seized a subset of these servers from a hosting provider that provided the infrastructure. The provider is said to have subsequently taken the botnet offline following its use for criminal purposes.

/* */