Toggle light / dark theme

Google DeepMind has developed a groundbreaking AI that can solve complex real-world problems like delivery planning and route optimization without needing exact answers or perfect data. By integrating a method called MCMC layers into neural networks, the system learns to make smart, flexible decisions in real time—even under tough constraints. This new approach outperforms older models and could transform industries like logistics, healthcare scheduling, and city traffic management.

🤖 What’s Inside:
DeepMind’s New AI That Solves Real-World Problems Without Exact Data.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14240
How MCMC Layers Make Neural Networks Smarter at Planning.
AI vs Classical Methods in Solving NP-Hard Logistics Tasks.

🎥 What You’ll See:
Why traditional AI fails at scheduling and delivery planning.
How Google’s new AI tackles chaotic, constraint-heavy problems in milliseconds.
The secret behind MCMC layers and simulated annealing in neural networks.
Real-world results that could reshape logistics, healthcare, and urban planning.

📊 Why It Matters:
This isn’t about smarter chatbots—it’s about AI solving the hardest real-life decisions with speed and flexibility. From dynamic routing to hospital schedules, DeepMind’s breakthrough shows AI can finally plan like a pro—even with messy, incomplete data.

#ai #deepmind #google

Can machines ever see the world as we see it? Researchers have uncovered compelling evidence that vision transformers (ViTs), a type of deep-learning model that specializes in image analysis, can spontaneously develop human-like visual attention patterns when trained without labeled instructions.

Visual attention is the mechanism by which organisms, or (AI), filter out “visual noise” to focus on the most relevant parts of an image or view. While natural for humans, spontaneous learning has proven difficult for AI.

However, researchers have revealed, in their recent publication in Neural Networks, that with the right training experience, AI can spontaneously acquire human-like visual attention without being explicitly taught to do so.

Unlike fish, jellyfish lack bones and possess a sole rudimentary nerve net, yet they can travel considerable distances with minimal energy expenditure. A jellyfish’s seemingly effortless glide through the water is thanks to a ring of muscle within its soft belly, which creates a simple jet that propels it forward. Scientists refer to this intrinsic capability as “embodied intelligence,” which suggests that the organism’s physical structure plays a role in problem-solving.

When harnessed, this locomotion provides an efficient means to monitor , track , and observe climate trends. “Jellyfish cyborgs” require minimal power and operate without engines, limiting the environmental impact associated with current methods of studying the vast expanse of the ocean.

In a new study, a research team, led by Dai Owaki, an associate professor in the Department of Robotics at Tohoku University’s Graduate School of Engineering, successfully modulated the swimming behavior of using gentle electric pulses. Moreover, they utilized a lightweight artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict the swimming speed of each jellyfish.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei claims that modern AI models may surpass humans in factual accuracy in structured scenarios. He noted that AI, particularly the Claude series, tends to hallucinate less often than humans when answering specific factual questions.

UBTech’s consumer shift comes as it faces financial strain. The company lost over 1.1 billion yuan ($153 million) last year. Its stock has fallen 45% over the past 12 months in Hong Kong.

Still, Tam welcomes the pressure. “White-hot competition creates a lot of pressure on a single company, but for the whole industry, it helps preserve good companies and eliminate bad ones,” he told Bloomberg.

As humanoid robots inch closer to everyday life, UBTech’s shift to the home market marks a high-stakes bet.

Learning and motivation are driven by internal and external rewards. Many of our day-to-day behaviours are guided by predicting, or anticipating, whether a given action will result in a positive (that is, rewarding) outcome. The study of how organisms learn from experience to correctly anticipate rewards has been a productive research field for well over a century, since Ivan Pavlov’s seminal psychological work. In his most famous experiment, dogs were trained to expect food some time after a buzzer sounded. These dogs began salivating as soon as they heard the sound, before the food had arrived, indicating they’d learned to predict the reward. In the original experiment, Pavlov estimated the dogs’ anticipation by measuring the volume of saliva they produced. But in recent decades, scientists have begun to decipher the inner workings of how the brain learns these expectations. Meanwhile, in close contact with this study of reward learning in animals, computer scientists have developed algorithms for reinforcement learning in artificial systems. These algorithms enable AI systems to learn complex strategies without external instruction, guided instead by reward predictions.

The contribution of our new work, published in Nature (PDF), is finding that a recent development in computer science – which yields significant improvements in performance on reinforcement learning problems – may provide a deep, parsimonious explanation for several previously unexplained features of reward learning in the brain, and opens up new avenues of research into the brain’s dopamine system, with potential implications for learning and motivation disorders.

Reinforcement learning is one of the oldest and most powerful ideas linking neuroscience and AI. In the late 1980s, computer science researchers were trying to develop algorithms that could learn how to perform complex behaviours on their own, using only rewards and punishments as a teaching signal. These rewards would serve to reinforce whatever behaviours led to their acquisition. To solve a given problem, it’s necessary to understand how current actions result in future rewards. For example, a student might learn by reinforcement that studying for an exam leads to better scores on tests. In order to predict the total future reward that will result from an action, it’s often necessary to reason many steps into the future.