This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies you are not a bot.
Out today in @sciencemagazine, Doudna lab researchers Petr Skopintsev, Isabel Esain Garcia, and alum Evan DeTurk describe a new #AI-assisted method for designing genome editors beyond those found in nature, with the potential for designing custom editors with specific properties. They tested close to 2,000 of the AI-generated variants in lab, with many showing similar or improved editing ability relative to conventional #CRISPR enzymes, across bacterial, plant, and human cells. đĄâŠ #biotech #innovation #GenomeEditing @ucberkeleyofficial
The era of âgrowth at all costsâ in AI is ending. If the market is demanding efficiency and sustainable margins, a model that delivers elite intelligence at a fraction of the price is exactly what will stabilize developer workflows. Itâs no longer just about who has the biggest modelâitâs about who has the best intelligence-per-dollar ratio.
Chat, compare, vote for the worldâs best AI models. Join the community shaping the public leaderboard for LLMs, image, and code models through real-world evaluation.
Lila is betting that science, not the internet, is the last untapped source of training data. We went to find out what that actually looks like in a room full of robots.
Everyone talks about the #Singularity. Almost nobody agrees on what it actually means.
Fourteen years ago, I stopped and collected the definitions. Not two or three. Seventeen of them. Turing. Von Neumann. I.J. Good. Vinge. Kurzweil. Bostrom. Plus a few names most people have never heard.
I expected them to line up. They didnât. Some contradict each other outright. The one word weâve built entire movements, companies, and fortunes on turns out to mean wildly different things depending on who is holding it.
And I wrote this before ChatGPT. Before the current #AI gold rush. Before âsuperintelligenceâ became a line in quarterly earnings calls.
Read all seventeen, then tell me which one you would bet your future on. Or give me an eighteenth.
For grid-scale energy storage and national energy resilience, the U.S. needs better batteries. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) scientists are tackling that challenge in many ways, but one approach is making a significant impact: physics-informed machine learning.
In two recent publications, LLNL researchers examined how integrating molecular dynamics simulations with physics-informed machine learning can illuminate the relationships between structure and behavior in complex battery materials. They used the combination of techniques to explore carbon anodes in sodium-ion batteries and liquid electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries.
âThese studies show that the structural complexity of battery materials is not just an obstacle to understanding but a design advantage, laying the groundwork for high-throughput screening of next-generation energy-storage materials,â said LLNL scientist and author Liwen (Sabrina) Wan. âBy encoding that complexity into physics-informed machine learning models, we can predict properties and identify design levers that traditional approaches simply cannot access.â
Quantum computers promise to solve problems that would take even the fastest conventional supercomputers a vast amount of time, but the quantum information they store and process is extremely sensitive to even tiny disturbances from their surroundings. To keep these systems operating reliably, they need to be constantly recalibratedâinterrupting their calculations in the process.
In a new experiment published in Nature, researchers led by Volodymyr Sivak at Google Quantum AI developed a machine-learning approach that continuously adjusts a quantum computer as it works. Their approach could allow quantum calculations to run far longer without costly interruptions.