Toggle light / dark theme

Human vision: what we actually see — and don’t see — tells us a lot about consciousness

Despite denying any conscious awareness of the bar, the participant could answer correctly at a level well above chance. The participant even showed evidence of being able to pay attention to the bar – they were faster to respond when an arrow (placed in a healthy area of their visual field) correctly indicated the location of the bar.

The most popular interpretation (though not the only one) is that people with blindsight can see these objects, but not see them consciously. They see what is there, but it all goes on unconsciously, below their awareness.

The phenomenon of inattentional blindness seems to show you can see without the information crossing into your consciousness. Anyone can experience inattentional blindness. The phenomenon has been known about for a long time, but we can most easily get a handle on it by looking at a well-known experiment reported in 1999.

Combination treatment benefits patients with advanced breast cancer that has spread to the brain

Patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) have historically had few treatment options. Now, researchers from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have found a combination of targeted therapies, tucatinib and trastuzumab, plus the chemotherapy drug, capecitabine, may improve symptoms and extend survival in some breast cancer patients with LM.

The Phase II study, published today in Nature Cancer, included 17 female patients with newly diagnosed LM and HER2+ breast cancer. Median overall survival (OS) in those treated with the combination therapy increased from a historical average of 4.4 months to 10 months. At the 18-month mark, 41% of patients were still alive. Under the combination treatment, disease progression also stalled, with a median of seven months before central nervous system progression, and 7 of 12 evaluable patients also had improved neurologic deficits.

“The combination achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared to historical controls,” said lead author Rashmi Murthy, M.D., associate professor of Breast Medical Oncology. “For these patients, who often face limited treatment options, our results represent a step forward, offering new hope in how we treat and manage leptomeningeal metastasis.”

Defining Alzheimer’s disease: stipulations and the ethics of diagnostic change

In this really interesting essay, Michalon et al discuss defining Alzheimer’s disease in response to recent discussions on revising the definition and diagnostic criteria for the condition. The essay provides interesting historical context to the debate.


Recent revisions of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) definitions by two leading research groups—the Alzheimer’s Association and the International Working Group—reflect divergent approaches: the former promotes a strictly biological definition, while the latter promotes a clinicalbiological construct. We contend that this emerging controversy is not merely semantic, but scientifically, clinically, and politically significant. Drawing on philosophical tools and situating the current debate within a broader historical context from the reconceptualization of AD in the 1970s onwards, we explore how definitions can serve as transformative instruments, acting as strategic bets that reshape scientific fields and clinical practices. Ultimately, we draw from the AD case study to argue for a critical reflection on the risks and promises of such definitional acts. We also propose a renewed attention to the ‘ethics of stipulating’ in the field of contemporary biomedical sciences.

In response to advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, two major research groups specialising in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have recently revised their definition and diagnostic criteria for the condition. While they concur on certain aspects—most notably, the centrality of amyloid and tau pathologies—the two groups have proposed different types of definition. The Alzheimer’s Association (AA) group asserts the following fundamental principle: “AD is defined by its unique neuropathologic findings; therefore, detection of AD neuropathologic change by biomarkers is equivalent to diagnosing the disease” 1(p.5145). This definition regards specific biological changes as the unique defining feature rather than a joint characteristic, together with specific symptoms, of a disease. In this framework, asymptomatic individuals can be diagnosed with ‘preclinical AD’

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Pathologically Confirmed Comorbid Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

Background and ObjectivesLittle is known about the clinical presentation in patients with comorbid Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) neuropathology, despite frequent comorbidity of…

Hypoxia-inducible protein 2 mediates metabolic adaptation of Ly6ChighLy6Glow monocytes after stroke

New study from Weijie Chen, Xin Wang, Tingting Huang, Weifeng Yu.

Florent Ginhoux, Peiying Li (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) and colleagues identifies hypoxia-inducible protein 2 (HIG2) as a key regulator of anti-inflammatory property of Ly6ChighLy6Glow monocyte-derived macrophages in the ischemic brain after stroke through mediating phosphatidylcholine synthesis.


This study identifies hypoxia-inducible protein 2 (HIG2) as a key regulator of anti-inflammatory property of Ly6ChighLy6Glow monocyte-derived macrophages i.

A neuron pair in fruit flies that makes life or death decisions

For the fruit fly, a sense of taste is critical to whether it thrives or dies. The little winged creature has taste organs in its mouthpiece as well as throughout its body, including its legs, abdomen and wing margins. When a fruit fly lands on a ripe or rotting fruit, it instantly receives information about whether the fruit is bitter or sweet. Sweetness indicates a caloric payday that cues the fly to feed; bitterness prompts the fly to move on from the potentially toxic substance.

Researchers in the lab of Brown University professor Gilad Barnea have identified the pair of neurons that make this critical choice. The insights on how flies navigate this complex decision-making process, a process not previously clear to scientists, are published online in Nature Communications.

“If a fly makes just one mistake about what to eat, it may die,” said Barnea, a professor of neuroscience and director of the Center for the Neurobiology of Cells and Circuits at Brown’s Carney Institute for Brain Science. “So the decision is super important. This newly discovered mechanism illustrates the impressive level of computation that a single neuron can do.”

Abstract: Decoding neurodegeneration one cell at a time

https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI199841 As part of the JCI’s Review Series on Neurodegeneration, Olivia Gautier, Thao P. Nguyen & Aaron D. Gitler explore the molecular basis for selective neuronal vulnerability and degeneration and summarize recent advances and applications of single-cell genomic approaches.


How do we decide whether we should choose single-cell or single-nucleus sequencing? This depends on sample types and biological applications. Single-cell sequencing is typically applied to fresh, readily dissociable tissues or cultured cells to study intact cell populations. Because it captures both cytoplasmic and nuclear transcripts, scRNA-seq provides a comprehensive view of cellular gene expression. However, tissue dissociation can induce stress-related transcriptional artifacts and introduce substantial cell-type bias. Large or fragile neurons are often lost during dissociation, whereas smaller cell types, such as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, tend to be overrepresented. In contrast, single-nucleus sequencing is commonly used for frozen samples or for tissues that are difficult to dissociate, including the brain and spinal cord. Although fresh or fresh-frozen samples are typically used, snRNA-seq is compatible with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, enabling the analysis of archived human specimens. A key limitation is that snRNA-seq does not capture cytoplasmic transcripts and is therefore biased toward nuclear, often premature, mRNA species.

Spatial transcriptomics does not require tissue dissociation and enables examination of cellular transcriptomes within their native tissue niches. Some spatial transcriptomic technologies are now compatible with FFPE samples, allowing analyses of preserved clinical specimens along with fixed-frozen and fresh-frozen samples. These technologies can be broadly classified into two main categories: imaging-based and sequencing-based (Figure 2B). Imaging-based approaches, like multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH), spatially resolved transcript amplicon readout mapping (STARmap), and 10x Genomics Xenium, rely on probe hybridization and multiplexed imaging to detect and visualize transcripts at high spatial resolution, often achieving single-cell or even subcellular resolution (17, 18). Although whole-transcriptome measurements are possible, MERFISH typically targets predefined gene panels due to the constraints of iterative hybridization and imaging. In contrast, sequencing-based approaches, including NanoString GeoMx and 10x Genomics Visium, capture RNA on spatially barcoded tissue slides or nanobeads followed by next-generation sequencing. These methods generally recover a broader range of transcripts than imaging-based approaches but, in most cases, do not yet achieve true single-cell resolution. Instead, they measure gene expression within spatial “spots” that encompass multiple cells and therefore rely on computational deconvolution to infer cell-type composition. Newer spatial transcriptomic methods, like spatial enhanced resolution omics sequencing (Stereo-seq) and reverse-padlock amplicon-encoding fluorescence in situ hybridization (RAEFISH), are approaching single-cell and single-molecule resolution (1921).

In this Review, we summarize recent advances and applications of single-cell genomics approaches to study neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer disease (AD), Parkinson disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Huntington disease (HD). We focus on how these approaches provide insight into the unique vulnerabilities of specific neuronal populations, define novel disease-associated cellular states, and reveal contributions of non-neuronal cells to disease pathogenesis. We then look to the future, envisioning how these technologies will empower genetic screens to uncover modifiers of neurodegeneration and new therapeutic targets.

Precision radio waves may help counter brain diseases

A study has found that precise application of radio waves can change the activity of brain cells in ways that could counter neurological conditions. Led by researchers at NYU Langone Health, the work introduces a technique called transcranial radio frequency stimulation (TRFS), which promises to treat neurological diseases with neither the invasiveness of surgery nor the frequent failure of drugs as patients (e.g., 30% of people with depression and epilepsy) develop resistance.

Published online recently in the journal Brain Stimulation, the study describes the use of radio frequency (RF) energy, which is effective at penetrating biological tissue. The study says TRFS could overcome the limits of older technologies because it can, depending on the nature of the disease, target either a small part of the brain or the entire organ, and it can dial nerve signaling up or down.

“Our study is the first to demonstrate in live mice the potential of the technology to be highly effective for adjusting neural activity,” said senior study author György Buzsáki, MD, Ph.D., the Biggs Professor of Neuroscience in the Department of Neuroscience at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. “The need for better, noninvasive techniques is becoming ever more urgent, with one in three people globally affected by some form of brain disorder during their lifetime,” said Dr. Buzsáki, also faculty at the Institute for Translational Neuroscience.

/* */