Toggle light / dark theme

Mechanisms and Regulation of Cellular Senescence

Cellular senescence is generally an irreversible proliferative arrest in damaged normal cells that have exited the cell cycle. These cells display high metabolic activities [1], remain viable, and actively suppress apoptosis [2, 3]. Senescent cells present unique morphological and molecular characteristics and functions that distinguish them from other nondividing cell populations, such as quiescent cells and terminally differentiated cells [4, 5, 6]. The hallmarks of cellular senescence include: prolonged cell cycle arrest, transcriptional changes, acquisition of a bioactive secretome, known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), macromolecular damage, and deregulated metabolism [7].

Replicative senescence was the first cellular senescence subtype to be described [8]. It is induced after serial propagation of normal human cells in culture and is caused by telomere erosion and the consequent increase in DNA lesions [9, 10,11,12]. The limited lifespan of most (perhaps all) cultured primary cells is influenced by the species and tissue type from which they were derived. Senescence can also be triggered by many other intrinsic and extrinsic factors, particularly, replicative stress, oxidative damage, metabolism dysfunctions, cytokines, oncogene activation, and chemotherapy agents. All these factors can induce DNA damage and senescence in normal and cancer cells (in some contexts) [6]. Cellular senescence occurs not only in vitro (i.e., cell culture models), but also in various tissues in vivo [13,14,15,16].

Senescence is an important contributor to cancer and aging, two processes characterized by a time-dependent accumulation of cell damage and dysfunction. Senescence markers are detected in premalignant tumor lesions but not at later stages of tumor development [17,18,19]. The proliferative arrest imposed by cellular senescence represents an early barrier against cancer initiation by preventing the propagation of damaged DNA to the next generation of cells [18,20]. Therefore, it has been proposed that senescence escape is required for tumor progression to overt malignancy [18,21]. On the other hand, senescent fibroblasts can influence their local environment by turning into proinflammatory cells that can promote the growth of transformed or preneoplastic neighboring epithelial cells in culture and in vivo [22,23,24].

Associations of Lifetime Cognitive Enrichment With Incident Alzheimer Disease Dementia, Cognitive Aging, and Cognitive Resilience

Study results suggest that cognitive health in later life is in part the product of lifetime exposure to cognitive enrichment.


Background and Objectives.

Scientists reverse muscle aging in mice and discover a surprising catch

A UCLA study in mice reveals that aging muscle stem cells accumulate a protein that slows repair but boosts survival. This protein, NDRG1, acts like a brake, preventing cells from activating quickly after injury. When researchers blocked it in older mice, muscle healing sped up dramatically — but stem cells became less resilient over time. The work suggests aging may reflect a survival trade-off rather than straightforward decline.

Common anti-seizure drug prevents Alzheimer’s plaques from forming

At the heart of the new discovery is amyloid precursor protein (APP), a protein that plays important roles in brain development and synaptic formation. Abnormal processing of APP can lead to the production of amyloid‑beta peptides, which play a central role in the development of Alzheimer’s disease. The scientists found that how APP is trafficked also controls whether a neuron forms amyloid-beta 42.

During the synaptic vesicle cycle — a fundamental process that underlies every thought, movement, memory or sensation — levetiracetam binds to a protein called SV2A. This interaction slows down a step in which neurons recycle synaptic vesicle components from the cell’s surface. By pausing this recycling process, the drug enables APP to remain on the cell’s surface longer, diverting it away from the pathway that produces toxic amyloid‑beta 42 proteins.

“In our 30s, 40s and 50s, our brains are generally able to steer proteins away from harmful pathways,” the author said. “As we age, that protective ability gradually weakens. This is not a statement of disease; this is just a part of aging. But in brains developing Alzheimer’s, too many neurons go astray, and that’s when you get amyloid-beta 42 production. And then it’s tau (or ‘tangles’), and then it’s dead cells, then dementia, then neuroinflammation — and then it’s too late.”

To effectively prevent Alzheimer’s symptoms, high-risk individuals would need to begin taking levetiracetam “very, very early,” the author said, possibly up to 20 years before the new FDA-approved Alzheimer’s disease test would even capture mildly elevated levels of amyloid-beta 42.

“You couldn’t take this when you already have dementia because the brain has already undergone a number of irreversible changes and a lot of cell death,” the author said.

Leveraging its status as an FDA-approved and widely used drug, the team mined existing human clinical data to investigate whether Alzheimer’s patients who took levetiracetam experienced slowed cognitive decline. They obtained clinical data from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center and conducted a correlative analysis, finding that Alzheimer’s patients who took levetiracetam were associated with a significant delay from the diagnosis of cognitive decline to death compared to those taking lorazepam or no/other anti-epileptic drugs. ScienceMission sciencenewshighlights.


Cryosphere Chat — Tomorrow Bio’s Big Announcement, Biostasis Summit Updates

In this epsiode of the Cryosphere Chat we discuss:
● The themes of this year’s Biostasis Summit.
● Our thoughts on Tomorrw Bio’s big announcement about longevity experts.
● Greg Fahy’s paper on ultrastructure preservation in vitrified brains.

Links:
Buy tickets for the Biostasis days at Vitalist Bay: https://vitalistbay.com/ (use code CRYOSPHERE20 for 20% off)
Biostasis Summit needs based discount application: https://forms.gle/4pR3r4uvXprc4mH99
Biostasis Summit pitch application: https://forms.gle/FQsqx9thLvryKteq8
Join the Biostasis Summit mailing list: https://www.globalcryonicssummit.com/
Survey of cryonicists: https://cryospherepress.substack.com/p/the-cryonics-survey-of-2022-part.
Cryonics Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/cryonics/
Cryosphere Discord: https://discord.gg/ndshSfQwqz.
Cryosphere Substack: https://cryospherepress.substack.com/

FDA Greenlights Life Biosciences’ Human Study, Setting Up Pivotal Test for Aging Theory from Harvard’s David Sinclair

…Life Biosciences, a biotech company co-founded by Sinclair, received the FDA’s approval to begin a human trial testing its gene therapy based on the Information Theory of Aging. The gene therapy is designed to rewind the clock and restore the function of dying cells…

…Life Biosciences’ gene therapy has been under development for quite a while. In the 1990s, David Sinclair first contended that the deterioration and loss of epigenetic information—chemical tagging patterns on DNA that regulate which genes are turned on and off—plays an important role in driving aging. Sinclair subsequently dubbed this contention the Information Theory of Aging. Fast forward to the present day, and Life Biosciences has produced a gene therapy that delivers three proteins, which Sinclair’s laboratory helped establish, to reset epigenetic information to a more youthful state.

‘It’s extremely exciting,’ Sinclair told Endpoints News. ‘It’s been over 30 years to get to this point, and we’re about to learn if all of that work is going to come to fruition this year.’


The FDA has greenlighted Life Biosciences’ first human trial testing whether their gene therapy can confer a near-total rejuvenating reset of cells.

Rejuvenating neurons restores learning and memory in mice

A research team asked whether rejuvenating these engram neurons could recover memory after decline has already begun? In a study published in Neuron, the team reports that “partial reprogramming” of engram neurons restores memory performance in multiple mouse settings. The approach uses a short, controlled pulse of three genes, Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 referred together as “OSK”

Previous studies have shown that carefully timed expression of these factors can reset several aging-related features in cells. Here, the team targeted OSK specifically at the engram neurons that are active during learning, rather than broadly across the entire brain.

Working on mice, the researchers used gene therapy vectors (adeno-associated viruses) delivered by precise brain injections. They combined two elements: a system that adds a fluorescent tag to neurons that are activated by learning, and a switch that briefly turns OSK on during a defined time window.

The team used their approach in brain areas known to support different kinds of memory: the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, which is important for learning and recent recall, and the medial prefrontal cortex, which contributes to remote recall two weeks later.

In aged mice, briefly activating OSK in learning-related hippocampal engram neurons restored memory, essentially bringing performance back to levels seen in young controls. When the same approach was applied to prefrontal cortex engrams, it also recovered remote memories formed weeks earlier.

The reprogrammed engram neurons also showed signs of improved health. They maintained their neuronal identity and displayed molecular features associated with a younger state, including changes in nuclear structure linked to aging.

The team then tested mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. In a spatial-learning task, the mice showed inefficient navigation and impaired memory strategies. Reprogramming dentate gyrus engrams improved learning strategies during training, while targeting prefrontal engrams restored long-term spatial memory.

/* */