Lifeboat Foundation: Safeguarding Humanity
Toggle light / dark theme

Blog

Category: particle physics – Page 52

The structure of water: Entropy determines whether ions stick

Water molecules do not simply swirl around in complete disorder; they can form certain preferred structures. This scientific fact is often presented in entirely unscientific ways. For example, when people speak of an alleged “memory of water” or of “water clusters” as a possible explanation for homeopathy, among other things.

All of this has been refuted. But even though water is not a magical information storage medium, its ability to form short-lived structures can have important consequences. This has now been shown in a study by TU Wien, in collaboration with the University of Vienna and the University of Oslo, as part of the Cluster of Excellence “MECS.” The team investigated how easily charged particles can be held at a surface—a question that is important in many areas, such as research on batteries, fuel cells, and biological membranes. The new results show that this can only be understood if one takes into account the structures that water forms on nanosecond timescales.

The research is published in the journal Science Advances.

Bilayer antiferromagnet reveals photocurrent that flips with magnetic state

In recent years, atomically thin materials—crystals only a few atoms thick—have attracted growing attention because they can exhibit physical properties that do not appear in conventional bulk materials. Among them, atomically thin magnetic materials are particularly intriguing, as they can host unconventional magnetic states and offer new possibilities for spin-based electronic technologies.

In a Nature Materials study, researchers investigated the photocurrent response of a bilayer atomically thin antiferromagnet. In this material, spins are aligned within each atomic layer, while the spin orientations of the top and bottom layers are opposite. Depending on the relative spin configuration between the two layers, the system exhibits two distinct antiferromagnetic (AFM) states.

To explore how these magnetic states interact with light, the researchers fabricated devices by attaching electrodes to bilayer samples and illuminated the center of the material, away from the electrodes. They measured both the zero-bias photocurrent and current-voltage characteristics under illumination.

Scientists Created a Subatomic Particle That Defies Our Understanding of Physics

For decades, every known atomic and nuclear system has relied on at least two fundamental forces working in concert: the strong force binds protons and neutrons inside the nucleus, while electromagnetism holds electrons in orbit around it. Now, an international team of physicists has found the first experimental evidence of a nuclear system bound exclusively by the strong force—confirming a theoretical prediction made twenty years ago and opening a new window onto how matter acquires mass.

Creating a system held together by only one force required a particle with a special property: no electric charge. Ordinary atoms can’t do the job because their components—protons and electrons—are electrically charged, so electromagnetism is always in play. The Standard Model of particle physics, which describes three of the four fundamental forces (the strong force, the weak force, and electromagnetism —gravity isn’t included), predicts that electrically neutral mesons should be able to bind to a nucleus through the strong interaction alone. The eta prime meson (η′) is the ideal test case: it carries no electric charge, so it can’t be bound electromagnetically, and its unusually large mass makes it a uniquely sensitive probe of the strong force’s inner workings.

Physicists create hybrid light-matter particles that interact strongly enough to compute

Eighty years ago, Penn researchers J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly launched the age of electronic computing by harnessing electrons to solve complex numerical problems with ENIAC, the world’s first general-purpose electronic computer. Today, that same architecture still underlies general computing, but electrons are beginning to show their limits. Because they carry a charge, they lose energy as heat, encounter resistance as they move through materials, and become harder to manage as chips incorporate more transistors and handle larger volumes of data.

With artificial intelligence pushing today’s hardware to process, move, and cool more, Penn physicists led by Bo Zhen in the School of Arts & Sciences are looking to the electron’s massless counterpart, the photon, to shoulder more of the load.

“Because they are charge-neutral and have zero rest mass, photons can carry information quickly over long distances with minimal loss, dominating communications technology,” explains Li He, co-first author of a paper published in Physical Review Letters and a former postdoctoral researcher in the Zhen Lab. “But that neutrality means they barely interact with their environment, making them bad at the sort of signal-switching logic that computers depend on.”

Exploiting interfacial ionic mobility to make heat-moldable nanoparticle aggregates

If you have ever warped a cheap plastic cup by pouring coffee into it, then you have witnessed thermoplasticity in action. Thermoplasticity is the ability of a material to become pliable under heating. In industry, thermoplasticity is exploited to form materials into complex shapes using heat. However, some materials, such as aggregates of nanoparticles, are not thermoplastic and cannot be easily processed without affecting their particle morphology and properties.

However, researchers at The University of Osaka have been able to use heat to shape nanoparticle aggregates, specifically cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) derived from wood pulp. This exciting advance, showcasing the mechanical and thermal potential of nanoparticles, is published in Science Advances.

String theory is uniquely derived from basic assumptions about the universe, physicists show

If you could take an apple and break it into smaller and smaller parts, you would find molecules, then atoms, followed by subatomic particles like protons and the quarks and gluons that make them up. You might think you hit the bottom, but, according to string theorists, if you keep going to even smaller scales—about a billion billion times smaller than a proton—you will find more: tiny vibrating strings.

Developed in the 1960s, string theory proposes that everything in the universe is made from invisible strings. The theory arose as a possible solution to the problem of “quantum gravity,” the quest to align quantum mechanics, which describes our world at the smallest scales, with the general theory of relativity, which explains how our universe works on the largest scales (and includes gravity). Researchers have tried to reconcile the two theories—asking, for example, how gravity behaves in the quantum realm—but their equations go berserk, or in mathematical terms, go to infinity.

String theory is a mathematical solution that tames the unruly infinities. It purports that all particles, including the graviton—the hypothetical particle believed to convey the force of gravity—are generated by very small vibrating strings. The math behind string theory requires the strings to vibrate in at least 10 dimensions, rather than the four we live in (three for space and one for time), which is one of the reasons some scientists are not convinced that string theory is correct. But perhaps the biggest challenge for the theory is the ultrahigh energies required for testing it: Such an experiment would require a particle collider the size of a galaxy.

String Theory Emerges from “Almost Nothing”

Developed in the 1960s, string theory proposes that everything in the universe is made from invisible strings. The theory arose as a possible solution to the problem of “quantum gravity,” the quest to align quantum mechanics, which describes our world at the smallest scales, with the general theory of relativity, which explains how our universe works on the largest scales (and includes gravity). Researchers have tried to reconcile the two theories—asking, for example, how gravity behaves in the quantum realm—but their equations go berserk, or in mathematical terms, go to infinity.

String theory is a mathematical solution that tames the unruly infinities. It purports that all particles, including the graviton—the hypothetical particle believed to convey the force of gravity—are generated by very small vibrating strings. The math behind string theory requires the strings to vibrate in at least 10 dimensions, rather than the four we live in (three for space and one for time), which is one of the reasons some scientists are not convinced that string theory is correct. But perhaps the biggest challenge for the theory is the ultrahigh energies required for testing it: Such an experiment would require a particle collider the size of a galaxy.

What is a physicist to do? One way they can probe the theory is to turn to a “bootstrap” approach, in which researchers start with certain assumptions they believe to be true about the universe, and then see what laws emerge out of those assumptions. In a new paper titled “Strings from Almost Nothing,” accepted for publication in Physical Review Letters, Caltech researchers, and their colleagues at New York University and Institut de Fisica d’Altes Energies in Barcelona, have done just that. From a couple of basic assumptions about how particles should scatter off one another at very high energies, they derived the elements of string theory.

This Physicist (Unexpectedly) Derived Gravity from Information

Sponsors: Accelerate your efficiency. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at http://shopify.com/theories Sign up for Claude today at http://claude.ai/theoriesofeverything and checkout Claude Pro — which includes access to all of the features mentioned in today’s episode. I personally subscribe to The Economist. FLASH SALE to May 18: 50% off annual (double the usual!) No other podcast has this! https://economist.com/TOE

What if gravity is just entropy in disguise? Professor Erik Verlinde joins me to argue that gravity isn’t a fundamental force—it’s thermodynamic, emerging from quantum information the way gas pressure emerges from molecules bouncing around. We explore why spacetime may be stitched together by entanglement, and how dark energy and dark matter both pop out automatically without extra particles or parameters. Verlinde explains why the cosmological constant problem is a red herring, and why there may be no final theory of physics. When asked where the universe comes from, his answer is one word: chaos.

SUPPORT: Support me on Substack: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/su… me on Crypto: https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkou… Support me on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_… JOIN MY SUBSTACK (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com LISTEN ON SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b9… TIMESTAMPS:

  • 00:00:00 — Thermodynamic Gravity and Information
  • 00:06:35 — Beyond Effective Field Theory
  • 00:13:08 — Turtles All The Way Down
  • 00:25:41 — Entropy as a Force
  • 00:36:31 — Entanglement and Spatial Connectivity
  • 00:47:31 — Deriving Inertia and F=ma
  • 00:56:41 — De Sitter Space Challenges
  • 01:02:01 — Dark Matter and Milgram
  • 01:11:51 — The Emergence of Time
  • 01:21:01 — Statistical Gravity Fluctuations
  • 01:27:01 — Quantum Computational Complexity
  • 01:36:01 — Physics Intuition and Mentorship
  • 01:47:31 — Beauty, Garbage, and Chaos

LINKS MENTIONED: Papers, books, websites:

Videos:

  • • A 2 Hour Deep Dive into Entropy
  • • The Mathematics of String Theory [Graduate…
  • • The Debate That Divides Physics: Is the Un…
  • • The Physicist Who Found Quantum Theory’s U…
  • • Retrocausality & The Transactional Interpr…
  • • The Physicist Who Proved Entropy = Gravity
  • • The Physicist Who Says Time Doesn’t Exist
  • • The Most Astonishing Theory of Black Holes
  • • The (Simple) Theory That Explains Everythi…
  • • The Crisis in String Theory is Worse Than…
  • • Dark Dimensions: NEW THEORY Unifying Dark…
  • • MIT Scientist’s Discovery: “Black Holes Mi…
  • • The Woman Who Broke Gravity | Claudia de Rham
  • • Solving the Problem of Consciousness | Ste…
  • • Frederic Schuller: The Physicist Who Deriv…
  • • The Loop Quantum Gravity Debacle: Carlo Ro…
  • • An (Elementary) Introduction to Quantum Co…
  • • Can Physics Explain Its Own Laws?
  • • The Nobel Laureate Who (Also) Says Quantum…
  • • This Cosmologist Discovered Something Stra…
  • • Michael Levin: Consciousness, Biology, Uni…

SOCIALS:

  • Twitter: / toewithcurt
  • Discord Invite: / discord

Guests do not pay to appear. Theories of Everything receives revenue solely from viewer donations, platform ads, and clearly labelled sponsors; no guest or associated entity has ever given compensation, directly or through intermediaries. #science.

JOIN MY SUBSTACK (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com.

LISTEN ON SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b9…

TIMESTAMPS: 00:00:00 — Thermodynamic Gravity and Information 00:06:35 — Beyond Effective Field Theory 00:13:08 — Turtles All The Way Down 00:25:41 — Entropy as a Force 00:36:31 — Entanglement and Spatial Connectivity 00:47:31 — Deriving Inertia and F=ma 00:56:41 — De Sitter Space Challenges 01:02:01 — Dark Matter and Milgram 01:11:51 — The Emergence of Time 01:21:01 — Statistical Gravity Fluctuations 01:27:01 — Quantum Computational Complexity 01:36:01 — Physics Intuition and Mentorship 01:47:31 — Beauty, Garbage, and Chaos.

Continue reading “This Physicist (Unexpectedly) Derived Gravity from Information” | >

A Solid-State Pathway to Neutrino Mass

New density-functional-theory calculations describe the radioactive decay of tritium bound to graphene, offering a way to model experiments that could open cleaner windows onto neutrino mass.

The discovery that neutrinos oscillate—shifting among three “flavors” (electron, muon, and tau) as they propagate—showed that these elusive particles must have mass. Yet their absolute mass scale and the mass ordering (whether the lightest neutrino state is predominantly electron-, muon-, or tau-like) remain unknown. Determining these properties is a central goal of modern particle physics. A promising approach involves measuring the energy spectrum of electrons emitted in nuclear decay, particularly from tritium: Because the neutrino carries away part of the decay energy, a nonzero neutrino mass slightly modifies the spectrum of emitted electrons. Precision experiments such as KATRIN have pushed this method to its limit, setting an upper bound of about 0.45 eV on the neutrino mass [1]. While KATRIN uses molecular tritium gas, new strategies aim to go further by embedding tritium in engineered materials.

/* */