A fundamental goal in the field of sensory neuroscience is to understand the complex mechanisms that underlie the neural code responsible for processing natural visual scenes. In neuroscience, a fundamental yet unresolved question is how neural circuits are developed in natural settings by the interaction of multiple cell types. The eyes have evolved to communicate information about natural visual scenes using a wide range of interneurons, which is crucial for transmitting visual information to the brain.

Retina’s functioning is largely based on research into how it reacts to artificial stimuli like flashing lights and noise. These might not accurately represent how the retina interprets actual visual data. The complexity of how these more than 50 different types of interneurons contribute to retinal processing has yet to be fully understood despite the fact that different computations have been detected using such methods. In a recent research paper, a group of researchers has made a significant advancement by showing that a three-layer network model is capable of predicting retinal responses to natural sceneries with amazing precision, almost exceeding the bounds of experimental data. The researchers wanted to understand how the brain processes natural visual scenes, so they focussed on the retina, which is part of the eye that sends signals to the brain.

This model’s interpretability, i.e., the ability to comprehend and examine its internal organization, is one of its key characteristics. There is a strong correlation between the responses of interneurons that were directly included in the model and those that were separately recorded. This suggests that the model captures significant aspects of the retinal interneuron activity. It successfully reproduces a wide range of motion analysis, adaptability, and predictive coding phenomena when they are just trained on natural scenes. On the other hand, models trained on white noise cannot reproduce the same set of events, supporting the idea that examining natural sceneries is necessary to comprehend natural visual processing.

A recent study used special eye-tracking technology to investigate how people look at each other’s eyes and faces during conversations. The researchers, who published their results in Scientific Reports, found that people who exhibited more direct eye-to-eye contact during their conversation tended to also be better at following the direction of another’s gaze (they were better at understanding where the other person was looking). The research provides unique insights into non-verbal communication.

Much of human social communication occurs nonverbally, and eye contact plays a crucial role in allowing individuals to convey and interpret information such as attention, mental states, intentions, and emotions. Eye contact is not only passively received but also reciprocated through mutual looks.

The researchers wanted to examine the frequency and types of mutual looking behaviors, such as direct eye-to-eye contact and other gaze interactions involving different parts of the face. They were also interested in understanding how the mutual looking behaviors observed during interactions might influence subsequent gaze-following behavior.

Neuroscientists today report the first results from experimental tests designed to explore the idea that “forgetting” might not be a bad thing, and that it may represent a form of learning—and outline results that support their core idea.

Last year the neuroscientists behind the new theory suggested that changes in our ability to access specific memories are based on environmental feedback and predictability. And that rather than being a bug, forgetting may be a functional feature of the brain, allowing it to interact dynamically with a dynamic environment.

In a changing world like the one we and many other organisms live in, forgetting some memories would be beneficial, they reasoned, as this can lead to more flexible behavior and better decision-making. If memories were gained in circumstances that are not wholly relevant to the current environment, forgetting them could be a positive change that improves our well-being.