Argentine scientists created the world’s first genetically edited horse using CRISPR-Cas9 technology. Next projects include gene editing in pigs and cows.
Category: genetics – Page 10
Join us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/MichaelLustgartenPhD
Discount Links/Affiliates:
Blood testing (where I get the majority of my labs): https://www.ultalabtests.com/partners/michaellustgarten.
At-Home Metabolomics: https://www.iollo.com?ref=michael-lustgarten.
Use Code: CONQUERAGING At Checkout.
Clearly Filtered Water Filter: https://get.aspr.app/SHoPY
Researchers recently discovered that eight different psychiatric conditions share a common genetic basis.
A new study has now honed in on some of those shared genetic variants to understand their properties. They found many are active for longer during brain development and potentially impact multiple stages, suggesting they could be new targets to treat multiple conditions.
“The proteins produced by these genes are also highly connected to other proteins,” explains University of North Carolina geneticist Hyejung Won. “Changes to these proteins in particular could ripple through the network, potentially causing widespread effects on the brain.”
Science & Tech | The surgery highlights the potential of animal-to-human transplantation, with Andrews recovering well, showcasing promising medical progress.
The expression of genes has to be carefully regulated in cells; active genes give cells their identity and ability to function. Epigenetic features are just one way that cells control gene expression, and they do so without altering the sequence of genes. These may involve chemical groups like methyl tags that adorn DNA, or structural characteristics that relate to proteins that organize DNA. But scientists have also been learning about how epigenetics affect RNA. New findings on a balancing act in epigenetics, which works on DNA and RNA, have been reported in Cell.
When genes are expressed, they are transcribed into messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules. The cell can then translate those mRNA molecules into proteins, which carry out a variety of functions. Scientists have identified an epigenetic mechanism that seems to balance gene expression. One facet of the mechanism can promote the transcription and organization of genes, while the other causes mRNA transcripts to lose stability, and can adjust how those transcripts are used. This work has shown that DNA and RNA epigenetics may be more closely linked than known.
Viewpoint: The ‘post genomic era’ reveals nothing less than a new biology. We just don’t know how to talk about it
Posted in biological, biotech/medical, chemistry, genetics | Leave a Comment on Viewpoint: The ‘post genomic era’ reveals nothing less than a new biology. We just don’t know how to talk about it
Y ou could be forgiven for thinking that the turn of the millennium was a golden age for the life sciences. After the halcyon days of the 1950s and ’60s when the structure of DNA, the true nature of genes and the genetic code itself were discovered, the Human Genome Project, launched in 1990 and culminating with a preliminary announcement of the entire genome sequence in 2000, looked like – and was presented as – a comparably dramatic leap forward in our understanding of the basis of life itself. As Bill Clinton put it when the draft sequence was unveiled: ‘Today we are learning the language in which God created life.’ Portentous stuff.
The genome sequence reveals the order in which the chemical building blocks (of which there are four distinct types) that make up our DNA are arranged along the molecule’s double-helical strands. Our genomes each have around 3 billion of these ‘letters’; reading them all is a tremendous challenge, but the Human Genome Project (HGP) transformed genome sequencing within the space of a couple of decades from a very slow and expensive procedure into something you can get done by mail order for the price of a meal for two.
Since that first sequence was unveiled in 2000, hundreds of thousands of human genomes have now been decoded, giving an indication of the person-to-person variation in sequence. This information has provided a vital resource for biomedicine, enabling us, for example, to identify which parts of the genome correlate with which diseases and traits. And all that investment in gene-sequencing technology was more than justified merely by its use for studying and tracking the SARS-CoV-2 virus during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A new Yale study provides a fuller picture of the genetic changes that shaped the evolution of the human brain, and how the process differed from the evolution of chimpanzees.
For the study, published Jan. 30 in the journal Cell, researchers focused on a class of genetic switches known as Human Accelerated Regions (HARs), which regulate when, where, and at what level genes are expressed during evolution.
While past research theorized that HARs may act by controlling different genes in humans compared to chimpanzees, our closest primate relative, the new findings show that HARs fine-tune the expression of genes that are already shared between humans and chimpanzees, influencing how neurons are born, develop, and communicate with each other.
Uniquely human features of neocortical development and maturation are not only intriguing for their implications in human-specific cognitive abilities, but they are also vulnerable to dysregulation which could cause or contribute to distinctly human brain disorder pathophysiology. The human cerebral cortex is essential for both cognition and emotional processing and dysregulation of these processes of the cortex are associated with a wide range of brain disorders including schizophrenia (SZ), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Berman and Weinberger, 1991; Rubenstein, 2011; Xu et al., 2019). Much remains to be learned about the mechanisms governing cortical expansion and responses to pathogenesis between human and non-human primates (NHPs) (Otani et al., 2016). Understanding these differences could shed light on the underlying mechanisms responsible for human-specific brain disorders and lead to the identification of key targets for the development of effective therapies.
Subtle differences observed by comparing human neurodevelopment to that of our closest evolutionary relatives could reveal underlying mechanisms, including genomic or transcriptional differences, contributing to varied phenotypes (Pollen et al., 2019). Human-specific responses to pathogenesis might be elucidated in a similar manner; by comparing brain pathophysiology of humans to our non-human primate counterparts (Hof et al., 2004). Although rodent models have taught us much about basic mammalian brain development and disorders (Fernando and Robbins, 2011), comparing governing processes and responses to species more closely related to humans can reduce the number of variables allowing for the identification of specific mechanisms responsible for observed deviations. Studies analyzing induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos (Pan paniscus) show large sets of differentially expressed genes between human and NHP iPSCs. Perhaps the most compelling differentially expressed genes are those related to increased long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) mobility in chimpanzees and bonobos, which could have implications on the rates of genetic divergence among species, and alternative mechanisms of pluripotency maintenance in chimpanzees (Marchetto et al., 2013; Gallego Romero et al., 2015). Furthermore, when human and NHP iPSCs were differentiated to neurons, they displayed distinctive migratory patterns at the neural progenitor cell (NPC) stage followed by contrasting morphology and timing of maturation in neurons (Marchetto et al., 2019). Despite the ability of two-dimensional (2D) PSC-derived neural cultures to demonstrate basic organization and transcriptomic changes of early brain development (Yan et al., 2013), while retaining the genetic background of the somatic cells from which they are reprogrammed, they lack the ability to develop complex cytoarchitecture, recapitulate advanced spatiotemporal transcriptomics, and brain region interconnectivity (including migration and axon guidance) of ensuing primate brain development (Soldner and Jaenisch, 2019). Intricate cellular heterogeneity, complex architecture, and interconnectivity of neurodevelopment, in addition to pathogenic responses, could be observed by comparing human and NHP brain tissues; however, ethical concerns and the inaccessibility of pre-and postnatal primate brain tissues limits the feasibility of such studies.
While brain organoids might be a long way from forming or sharing thoughts with us, they could still teach us much about ourselves. Brain organoids are three-dimensional (3D), PSC-derived structures that display complex radial organization of expanding neuroepithelium following embedding in an extracellular matrix like Matrigel and can recapitulate some subsequent processes of neurodevelopment including neurogenesis, gliogenesis, synaptogenesis, heterogenous cytoarchitecture, cell and axon migration, myelination of axons, and spontaneously-active neuronal networks (Lancaster et al., 2013; Bagley et al., 2017; Birey et al., 2017; Quadrato et al., 2017; Xiang et al., 2017; Marton et al., 2019; Shaker et al., 2021). It is likely that all these features of neurodevelopment are governed by some degree of specifies-specific dynamics. Brain organoids can be generated from human and NHP PSCs and, since some pathways regulating neural induction and brain region specification are well conserved in primates, both unguided cerebral organoids and guided brain region specific organoids can be generated (Mora-Bermúdez et al., 2016; Field et al., 2019; Kanton et al., 2019). Additional protocols have been established for the derivation of brain region specific organoids from human PSCs (hPSCs), including dorsal forebrain, ventral forebrain, midbrain, thalamus, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and telencephalic organoids (Muguruma et al., 2015; Sakaguchi et al., 2015; Jo et al., 2016; Bagley et al., 2017; Birey et al., 2017; Watanabe et al., 2017; Xiang et al., 2017, 2019; Qian et al., 2018). With some modifications, these methods could prove to be successful in establishing brain region-specific organoids from a variety of NHP PSC lines allowing for the reproducible comparison of homogeneous, human-specific neurodevelopment and brain disorder pathophysiology in brain regions beyond the cortex.
A complex molecular machine, the spliceosome, ensures that the genetic information from the genome, after being transcribed into mRNA precursors, is correctly assembled into mature mRNA. Splicing is a basic requirement for producing proteins that fulfill an organism’s vital functions. Faulty functioning of a spliceosome can lead to a variety of serious diseases.
Researchers at the Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center (BZH) have succeeded for the first time in depicting a faulty “blocked” spliceosome at high resolution and reconstructing how it is recognized and eliminated in the cell. The research was published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.
The genetic information of all living organisms is contained in DNA, with the majority of genes in higher organisms being structured in a mosaic-like manner. So the cells are able to “read” the instructions for building proteins stored in these genetic mosaic particles, they are first copied into precursors of mRNA, or messenger RNA. The spliceosome then converts them into mature, functional mRNA.
UMD researchers have discovered key mechanisms in gene regulation that could improve the design of RNA-based medicines.
RNA-based medicines are among the most promising approaches to combating human disease, as evidenced by the recent successes of RNA
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) is a polymeric molecule similar to DNA that is essential in various biological roles in coding, decoding, regulation and expression of genes. Both are nucleic acids, but unlike DNA, RNA is single-stranded. An RNA strand has a backbone made of alternating sugar (ribose) and phosphate groups. Attached to each sugar is one of four bases—adenine (A), uracil (U), cytosine ©, or guanine (G). Different types of RNA exist in the cell: messenger RNA (mRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and transfer RNA (tRNA).