Toggle light / dark theme

Get the latest international news and world events from around the world.

Log in for authorized contributors

Longterm outcomes in IDHwildtype (IDHwt) gliomas with historical WHO grade 2 and 3 histology NeuroOncology

A total of 134 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 29.8 months. Median OS was 35 months (95% CI: 28.8–43), and median PFS was 20.9 months (95% CI: 14.5–27.4). Grade 2 tumors demonstrated significantly improved outcomes compared to grade 3 tumors (median OS 94.5 vs. 29.8 months; median PFS 50.6 vs. 15.3 months). Among grade 3 tumors, sequential radiation and chemotherapy yielded a median OS of 29.8 months versus 29.8 months with concurrent chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy (p = 0.17); median PFS was 22.2 months versus.

IDH-wt gliomas with grade 2–3 histology have heterogeneous outcomes. Grade 3 tumors show survival comparable to molecular glioblastoma, while a subset of grade 2 tumors exhibit prolonged survival. Concurrent chemoradiation did not confer a survival advantage over sequential therapy in grade 3 tumors, supporting reevaluation of treatment intensity in selected patients.

Modulation of Neuronal Ensembles Switches Memory Flexibility via Hippocampal Network Resynchronization

Engram cells are formed during learning and store memory information. However, little is known about the modulation of engram cells on time-dependent memory flexibility. Employing a male mouse model, we demonstrated that a temporal factor dictates the memory state, driving either pattern separation or pattern completion. Reengagement of engram cells in the dentate gyrus (DG) during memory retrieval in altered contexts was higher during pattern separation than during pattern completion, concomitant with a time-dependent reduction in synaptic transmission. Specific activation of DG engrams promoted pattern separation, whereas their inhibition accelerated pattern completion.

Artificial Intelligence: The Definitive Primer for the Acceleration Era: Understanding AI, Technology Convergence, Cybersecurity, and the Future

Artificial intelligence is not simply another chapter in the history of technology. It is becoming the cognitive infrastructure of modern civilization. Like electricity transformed the Industrial Age and the Internet transformed the Information Age, AI will define the Intelligence Age. Its true power will not come from replacing people, but from amplifying human ingenuity through the convergence of computing, cybersecurity, robotics, quantum science, biotechnology, and human creativity. The future will belong to societies that innovate boldly, secure wisely, govern responsibly, and never lose sight of the fact that technology should ultimately serve humanity—not the other way around.

Is Cryonics Even Legal? The Truth About Ethics, Law & Regulation

Cryonics is one of the most misunderstood ideas in science today: most people think it means “freezing dead people.” It doesn’t. Follow Tomorrow.bio to understand what cryopreservation actually is, how it works, and why a growing number of healthy people are choosing to sign up for it long before they need it. Thinking seriously about cryopreservation? We created a free guide covering the process, costs, funding, and important planning decisions: [ https://www.tomorrow.bio/tools/cryoguide ] 🫀ABOUT THIS VIDEO Part 3 of Cryonics A-Z is here. We’re covering the ethics behind cryopreservation, the current laws and regulations, what the future could look like, and the myths that just won’t die (pun intended). If you’ve ever wondered what’s actually true about cryonics, and what’s just noise, this one’s for you. 🔎 CHAPTERS [ 00:00 ] – Introduction [ 00:30 ] – Ethics of cryopreservation [ 07:56 ] – Do we freeze people? [ 10:01 ] – We just want to make money [ 12:53 ] – What about the future? [ 15:18 ] – How to deal with overpopulation [ 18:52 ] – Stagnation [ 20:47 ] – Cryonics & Religion [ 22:34 ] – Law & Regulation [ 30:41 ] – Outro 🔗 LINKS.

HumanCLAW: Can VisionLanguage Models Act Through a Body?

The Gap: Knowing that a shape in front of you is a “door handle” (recognition) is easy. Knowing whether your arm is long enough to reach it, whether your foot is currently blocking the door from swinging open, or if you’ve already walked past it is where current VLMs fail.


Evaluating whether a vision-language model (VLM) can act through a physical body is challenging. The outcome of an action couples the VLM’s decision with motor control. When a task fails, it is hard to tell whether the VLM made a bad choice or the motor controller simply failed to execute it, e.g., losing balance and falling. In this work, we introduce HumanCLAW, an evaluation framework that decouples action decision-making from low-level execution. At every step, a harnessed, off-the-shelf VLM issues an atomic skill command, and the command is translated into a sub-second chunk of continuous full-body motion with real physical consequences, including gravity and collisions. The body can therefore act freely in the physical world, while execution-side disturbances, balance and motor errors, are factored out.

/* */