Toggle light / dark theme

Iain McGilchrist — Can AI Become Conscious?

Follow Closer To Truth on Instagram for updates, announcements, and videos: https://shorturl.at/EzYo9

AI consciousness, its possibility or probability, has burst into public debate, eliciting all kinds of issues from AI ethics and rights to AI going rogue and harming humanity. We explore diverse views; we argue that AI consciousness depends on theories of consciousness.

Make a donation to Closer To Truth to help us continue exploring the world’s deepest questions without the need for paywalls: https://shorturl.at/OnyRq.

Iain McGilchrist FRSA is a British psychiatrist, philosopher and neuroscientist who wrote the 2009 book The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World.

Closer To Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn and directed by Peter Getzels, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

Human Minds Could Be Artificially Expanded and So Can AI

Further Reading
Brain implants revive cognitive abilities long after traumatic brain injury
https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-new

Brain implants revive cognitive abilities long after traumatic brain injury
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science

Neural co-processors for restoring brain function: results from a cortical model of grasping
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10

Brain–computer interfaces: the innovative key to unlocking neurological conditions
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles

MindPilot: Closed-loop Visual Stimulation Optimization for Brain Modulation with EEG-guided Diffusion
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.

Advancing brain-computer interfaces with generative AI: A review of state-of-the-art and future outlook.

Mathematics is All You Need 2 — Sign-Stabilized Behavioral Fibers in Transformer Residual Streams

Mathematics is All You Need 2: Sign-Stabilized Behavioral Fibers in Transformer Residual Streams This volume presents a pre-registered empirical investigation of the residual-stream geometry of frozen transformer language models, anchored by a four-test decision sprint executed on 2026/05/09 and a six-experiment tier-0 lockdown battery, with full reproducibility manifest. Empirical findings. Cross-architecture transfer of behavioral readouts from Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct to Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B yields mean AUC retention of 0.749 across 75 probe-layer pairs over 10 seeds (BCa bootstrap 95% CI [0.7466, 0.7577] from 10,000 resamples; permutation test 10,000 permutations p < 10⁻⁴; significance survives Bonferroni correction at α = 0.05). Causal steering of the target architecture using a probe direction trained on the source architecture produces strictly monotonic probe-output deflection on 29 of 29 held-out prompts (median Spearman ρ = 1.000, intervention range α ∈ [−3, +3]). Gauge-flexibility of the underlying low-rank substrate is established at high statistical power: 100 random orthogonal rotations of the projection basis produce retention standard deviation σ = 0.0096. The intrinsic dimension of the behavioral substrate is shown to be 1–4 for the majority of behavioral traits tested, with single-direction (r = 1) retention of 0.897. The angle between the rank-1 output highway direction and the centroid of trained probe directions at proportional depth is measured as 85.59° on Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct at layer 13, independently reproducing a prior internal measurement of 85.5° to within 0.1°. Theoretical synthesis. The Two-Channel theorem: the residual stream of a frozen transformer admits a decomposition into a high-variance rank-1-dominant output channel read by the unembedding head and a low-rank near-orthogonal behavioral channel supporting both readout and causal cross-architecture steering. The architecture-invariant object is established empirically as the sign-stabilized SVD subspace itself rather than any specific basis within it; the canonical-basis specificity hypothesis is formally rejected by pre-registered ablation (T2). Convergence with prior work. The geometric near-orthogonality result provides a measurement-side mechanism complementary to the training-side finding of Huang, LeCun & Balestriero (LLM-JEPA, arXiv:2509.14252, 2025) that embedding-space training objectives improve LLM performance without altering generative capabilities. The two results describe the same underlying functional separability of latent structure and generation in transformer residual streams via independent methodologies. Scope and limitations. The empirical foundation is restricted to a single source–target architecture pair (Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct → Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B), both decoder-only instruction-tuned transformers in the 7-8B parameter class. The headline T4 causal steering result is on one probe (language_id) at one layer pair (qL13 → hL15). Cross-family extension (Mistral, Phi, Gemma, Yi, Llama variants), multi-probe causal steering benchmarks, full d-model space angle measurement, and the PLATINUM-probe leakage audit are queued for the cluster reproduction sprint as a 15-pipeline validation matrix. Several claims from the prior volume Mathematics is All You Need (Napolitano 2026) are explicitly retracted or demoted to conjecture in Part VI of this work. Compute and reproducibility. Total wall time for the empirical foundation: approximately 9 hours on a single NVIDIA RTX 5090. Reproducibility manifest, replication recipes, and full numerical results are included as appendices. Keywords. Mechanistic interpretability; representation engineering; activation steering; cross-architecture transfer; linear representation hypothesis; transformer residual stream; behavioral probes; gauge invariance; pre-registered evaluation; Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures. Models and datasets used. Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct; Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B. Datasets: HumanEval, MBPP, MATH, GSM8K, ProofNet, WritingPrompts, ROC stories, Wikipedia. Companion volume. Integrates and supersedes the unreleased internal report CYGNUS 2: Information Field Theory and the Geometry of Machine Consciousness (April 2026), included as Part II. Access. Distribution prior to public-release date is restricted to identified academic reviewers and partner research labs under signed NDA. Public release is scheduled for 30 days after the priority date of associated U.S. provisional patent applications. Source code, model weights, cached residuals, and intermediate artifacts are proprietary property of Proprioceptive AI, Inc. License. Text under CC-BY 4.0; source code and artifacts proprietary. ORCID. 0009−0000−1927−8537

Why Scientists Are Combining Neurons With AI

Further Reading.

Large Language Models Inference Engines based on Spiking Neural Networks
https://arxiv.org/html/2510.00133v1

CL1_LLM_Encoder
https://github.com/4R7I5T/CL1_LLM_Enc

Organoid Intelligence: The Dawn of Living AI
/ organoid-intelligence-the-dawn-of-living-ai.

New 3D device harnesses living brain cells for computing
https://bioengineering.princeton.edu/.
US scientists merge 70,000 live neurons with electronics in hybrid brain chip
https://interestingengineering.com/in

Andrej Karpathy: From Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering

What’s changed in the year since he coined “vibe coding and explains why he’s never felt more behind as a programmer, why agentic engineering is the more serious discipline taking shape on top of vibe coding, and why we should think of LLMs not as animals but as ghosts: jagged, statistical, summoned entities that require a new kind of taste and judgment to direct. He also touches on Software 3.0, the limits of verifiability, and why you can outsource your thinking but never your understanding.

Humanity’s Endgame? We Built an AI That Will Command Us — MO Gawdat

🏦 Invest In Luxury Dubai Property https://londonreal.tv/dubai-ytd
🍿 Watch the full interview for free at https://londonreal.tv/gawdat.

In this powerful episode, Brian Rose sits down with former Google X exec and bestselling author Mo Gawdat 🧠 to explore the mind-blowing future of Artificial Intelligence 🤯. From the rise of machine learning to the ethical dangers of unchecked AI evolution ⚠️, this conversation uncovers why AI is the infant that could soon become our master.

🔥 Discover the truth about what’s coming

⚙️ Why we must act now to guide its growth
🧘♂️ And how mindfulness may be our only defense.

This one will change how you see the future 🌍💡
👉 Don’t miss it — hit play now and prepare your mind.

🚨 Learn To Make Money In Crypto:
💰The Investment club: https://londonreal.tv/club
💰Crypto & DeFi Academy: https://londonreal.tv/defi-ytd.

🔔 SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE: http://bit.ly/SubscribeToLondonReal

Godfather of AI: How To Make Safe Superintelligent AI

The co-inventor of modern AI and the most cited living scientist believes he’s figured out how to ensure AI is honest, incapable of deception, and never goes rogue. Yoshua Bengio – Turing Award Winner and founder of LawZero – is disturbed by the many unintended drives and goals present in today’s AIs, their ability to tell when they’re being tested, and demonstrated willingness to lie. AI companies are trying to stamp these out in a ‘cat-and-mouse game’ that Yoshua fears they’re losing.

But Yoshua is optimistic: he believes the companies can win this battle decisively with a single rearrangement to how AI models are trained, and has been developing mathematical proofs to back up the claim. The core idea is that instead of training AI to predict what a human would say, or to produce responses we’d rate highly, we should train it to model what’s actually true.

Learn more & full transcript: https://80k.info/bengio.

Yoshua argues this new architecture, which he calls “Scientist AI,” is a small enough change that we could keep almost all the techniques and data we use to train frontier AIs like Claude and ChatGPT. And that the new architecture need not cost more, could be built iteratively, and might be more capable as well as more honest.

Until recently, the biggest practical objection to Scientist AI was simple: the world wants agents, and Scientist AI isn’t one. But in new research, Yoshua has extended the design and believes the same honest predictor can be turned into a capable agent without losing its \.

Blood as the mirror and modulator of aging: mechanistic insights and rejuvenation strategies

Aging is a complex process influenced by changes in our blood that affect how quickly we age. Scientists have shown that blood contains important molecules and cellular components — including proteins, metabolites, and immune cells — that can either accelerate or slow aging. Tools such as the ‘proteomic aging clock’ predict age and disease risk based on blood protein profiles, whereas emerging multi-omics approaches integrate metabolomic and immunomic data. Large-scale analyses of circulating factors reveal how these components change with age and identify markers of organ-specific aging. Certain blood-borne molecules can predict diseases such as heart disease and Alzheimer disease. These findings demonstrate that aging does not occur uniformly across tissues. Overall, studying diverse blood components provides valuable insight into aging biology and offers opportunities to develop strategies that promote healthier aging and improve long-term health.

This summary was initially drafted using artificial intelligence, then revised and fact-checked by the author.

A human-inspired pipeline could enhance the training of computer vision models

Over the past few decades, computer scientists have developed increasingly advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can tackle some tasks exceedingly well. These include computer vision models, systems that can rapidly analyze images and categorize them, recognize objects and faces, or make other accurate predictions.

While computer vision systems now perform well on various tasks, they typically process visual information very differently from humans. While humans focus more on the shape and outline of objects, AI systems prioritize texture, such as color variations or repeated visual patterns. This difference may in part explain why AI vision systems remain much more prone to errors than human vision.

Researchers at Osnabrück University and Freie Universität Berlin recently introduced a new approach to train AI models that draws from the development of the human visual system. Their proposed pipeline, dubbed developmental visual diet (DVD), was introduced in a paper published in Nature Machine Intelligence.

/* */