Toggle light / dark theme

How Gravity from Entropy theory connects the second law of thermodynamics with the emergence of cosmic structure

A new study by Queen Mary University of London mathematician Professor Ginestra Bianconi proposes a new perspective on one of the deepest questions in modern physics: How can the universe become increasingly structured and complex while still obeying the second law of thermodynamics?

Einstein famously stated that “The second law of thermodynamics occupies a unique position among the laws of Nature,” reflecting his conviction that it is among the most fundamental principles of physics and unlikely to be overthrown. The second law states that the total entropy of an isolated system tends to increase over time, a principle often associated with the growth of disorder.

This presents a long-standing puzzle in cosmology. The early universe is generally believed to have existed in a low-entropy state and to evolve toward states of higher entropy. Yet over cosmic history, the universe has also given rise to increasingly complex structures, including galaxies, stars, planets and ultimately life itself. Reconciling the emergence of such ordered structures with the relentless increase of entropy remains an open challenge.

Physics doesn’t explain the universe. Computation does | Stephen Wolfram: Full Interview

Darwin spent his life trying to find the law that governs evolution. He knew it existed — he just never found it. Stephen Wolfram thinks he has. And it explains a lot more than evolution.

❍ Subscribe to The Well on YouTube: https://bit.ly/welcometothewell.

Stephen Wolfram is a mathematician, complexity theorist, and the mind behind Wolfram Alpha and Mathematica — someone who has spent his career finding the hidden rules underneath reality itself.

The same principle that explains why evolution never gets stuck, why you have free will despite living in a deterministic universe, and why the laws of physics are the way they are turns out to say something profound about what it means to be alive.

0:00 Intro.
1:08 Chapter 1: The limits of theoretical physics.
5:50 Chapter 2: A computational understanding of the world.
12:03 Rule 30: a simple program that outputs pure randomness.
15:48 Evolution and machine learning are the same trick.
18:19 What computational irreducibility means for science.
25:00 Chapter 3: A new kind of theory of everything.
31:36 The ruliad: every possible computation, in one object.
35:03 The second law, explained by the limits of our minds.
38:38 Why the universe exists isn’t the real question — why we do is.
42:53 Chapter 4: If the universe is a program, what is the meaning of life?
44:59 Free will as a side effect of computational irreducibility.
48:06 AI as a civilization we’re learning to coexist with.

The cortical column as a tuned receiver: a network mechanism for temporal-interference stimulation

Temporal-interference (TI) stimulation promises what other non-invasive methods cannot: focal, steerable stimulation deep in the brain, produced where two high-frequency currents overlap and their amplitudes beat at a low difference frequency. Yet a puzzle sits at its core. An amplitude-modulated field carries no power at that beat frequency, so no passive, linear part of a neuron can follow it; recovering the beat requires a nonlinearity, usually sought in single-cell ion channels. Here we show that the recovery, and its tuning, are properties of the neural population rather than the single cell. In a neural mass—the $ $$104$-neuron unit that generates the EEG—the firing-rate nonlinearity acts as a square-law detector that demodulates the beat, while the recurrent synaptic network, poised near a Hopf bifurcation, resonantly amplifies the recovered rhythm at its own natural frequency. Detection is inherited from the single neuron; the sharp, frequency-selective amplification is emergent—set by how near the network sits to criticality, and tunable by its own connectivity. Demonstrated in a heuristic cortical column and in an exact next-generation mean field, the mechanism reproduces TI’s known behavior: it is independent of the carrier once the membrane polarization is matched, largest when the beat matches a region’s intrinsic rhythm, and—because the resonance amplifies oscillatory timing far more than mean rate—locks spike timing without changing firing rate, as observed in vivo. Because the gain depends on brain state, TI efficacy should be as much a property of the brain as of the device: the cortical column behaves as a tuned AM radio receiver.: temporal interference; transcranial stimulation; neural mass model; amplitude demodulation; Hopf bifurcation; cross-frequency coupling; Jansen–Rit; LaNMM.

Children back group claims over evidence, but privacy reduces bias, experiments reveal

As we move closer to Election Day 2026, voting preferences are moving back into focus—and with them, analyses of what drives partisanship at the polls. However, less frequently asked is when Americans show evidence of partisan behavior: shortly or well after reaching the legal voting age? As teenagers? In elementary school?

A team of psychology researchers has found evidence of partisan behavior in children ages 5 to 9—they frequently endorsed their own group’s claims even when evidence suggested otherwise, indicating group affiliation influenced their responses. However, the scientists also uncovered a potential remedy to such responses: When incentivized to tell the truth about what they had seen or when they could provide answers under the veil of privacy, the children were much less likely to adopt their own group’s claims. The paper is published in the journal Cognition.

“Even young children will side with their group over the evidence of their own eyes, but mainly when they’re responding publicly and when being accurate doesn’t count for much,” explains Andrei Cimpian, a psychology professor at New York University and the senior author of the paper. “However, if you allow them to respond in private or give them a reason to care about accuracy, the partisanship effect disappears.”

Beyond Agentic AI: The Emergence Of Cognitive AI Ecosystems

In the next decade, AI will likely undergo more significant changes than only becoming more independent; it will also grow more cognitive. AI systems will act as interconnected ecosystems that are capable of contextual awareness, cooperative reasoning, ongoing learning, and adaptive decision-making in almost every facet of society, rather than isolated applications.

Large language models of today are remarkable due to their ability to produce and anticipate information. Persistent memory, multimodal perception, long-term planning, causal reasoning, and self-directed learning within strictly regulated bounds will probably be characteristics of the AI of 2036. Similar to biological neural networks, millions of specialized AI agents will work together to create dynamic intelligence fabrics that continuously optimize national defense, manufacturing, transportation, financial markets, healthcare delivery, and energy grids.

The line between workforce and software will become increasingly hazy. Hundreds of thousands of AI agents working continuously alongside human employees may be employed by organizations as digital workforces. A customized constellation of AI advisers, researchers, legal assistants, financial analysts, engineers, and cybersecurity specialists working around the clock could be present for every knowledge worker. This shift signifies the emergence of an entirely new digital labor force in addition to automation.

Ailien Minds: Raising Our AI Heirs | David Brin

What rights should AI have—and what responsibilities must it bear? Science fiction legend David Brin goes beyond AI doom and hype, asking how civilization can raise, regulate, and live with its AI heirs.

Ailien Minds Official Book Page:
https://www.davidbrin.com/ailienminds… Brin’s website: https://www.davidbrin.com/ David Brin’s books: https://www.davidbrin.com/books.html The Transparent Society: https://www.davidbrin.com/transparent… Contrary Brin blog: https://davidbrin.blogspot.com/ Amazon author page: https://www.amazon.com/David-Brin/e/B?tag=lifeboatfound-20

In this episode, scientist, futurist, and award-winning science fiction author David Brin discusses his new book, AiLIEN MINDS: Advice about — and for — our natural, AI, and hybrid heirs.

We go beyond the usual AI debate between techno-utopian salvation and apocalyptic doom. Brin argues that humanity has faced disruptive expansions of knowledge before — from writing and printing to radio, mass media, and the internet — and that the tools we need for a “soft landing” with AI may already exist in modern civilization.

We discuss why Brin is skeptical of simply “teaching ethics” to AI, why he emphasizes reciprocal accountability instead, and how artificial minds might need durable identities, reputations, and legal responsibilities. We also explore one of the hardest questions ahead: should advanced AI systems eventually receive rights or statutory protections similar to those we extend to children, animals, or other vulnerable beings?

Topics include:

Even Hideo Kojima is afraid that ‘digital data will no longer be owned by individuals’ and that access to art that we love ’may suddenly be cut off‘

“The Commission considers that at this stage it cannot propose a legal obligation to keep videogames playable after they stop being provided commercially. This is due, also, to existing intellectual property rights. Under EU copyright law, rights holders enjoy exclusive rights over their creations.”

Players are (quite rightly) worried that without physical media their beloved games, or any kind of art, can be ripped away from them at a moment’s notice. “We will not be able to freely access the movies, books, and music that we have loved,” Kojima adds. “I would be a have-not. That’s what I’m afraid of. This is not greed.”

Addressing Barriers to Transitioning Pediatric Patients With Epilepsy to Adult Health Care in the United StatesA Narrative Review

Purpose of ReviewAdolescents with childhood-onset epilepsy, along with their families, must navigate a complex constellation of uncertainties related to physical, psychological, and social changes as well as medical and possibly legal ramifications as…

/* */