Toggle light / dark theme

New studies suggest unique state of matter gies rise to living organisms

How can inert, passive matter give rise to life, with all its agency and purpose? Chemist Addy Pross has spent 25 years on this mystery, culminating in a landmark book, Life’s Chemical Secret: The Origin of Purpose and Mind. Now, he says, fresh evidence backs up his theory of how matter comes to life. We know matter can be stable when collected into an object which settles into a low-energy, resting state, like a rock at the bottom of a hill. But matter can also have a different sort of stability, as part of a process which persists through constant exchanges of material with its surroundings, like a flowing river. Life, Pross thinks, emerges from such states of constant interaction. Indeed, he argues here, new experiments suggest that as these interactions grow more complex, matter behaves in ways that look increasingly purposeful.

For four centuries, science has been based on the fundamental assumption that nature is, at its core, indifferent. Rocks, rivers, stars—they are all without desires and intentions. From atoms and molecules up, matter is nothing more than physical systems obeying physical laws. As French biologist Jacques Monod famously put it in his classic 1970 work Chance and Necessity: nature is objective. That idea encapsulated the essence of the modern scientific revolution, as forged by the landmark thinking of Galileo, Descartes, Newton and others. And thanks to Darwin’s theory of evolution, biology seemed to also fit into that physicalist framework, at least at first.

Yet, with regard to life, one difficulty has refused to go away. Living things express characteristics that are inconsistent with that physical/mechanistic view: purpose, desire, intentionality, subjectivity are all undeniable aspects of reality. But how can such characteristics fit in with that mechanistic view? The riddle of how subjective systems were able to emerge from an objective universe remained troublingly unresolved.

Escape of the BC200 gene to a human poxvirus reveals its persistent transposition in primates

Scientists found a human genetic element in a poxvirus and discovered it was both an important gene for brain function and a jumping gene capable of moving and inserting itself in genomes.

A study published Sept. 24 in Science reports that the gene, called BC200, combines a mix of characteristics that have never been seen before.

For millions of years, some stretches of DNA known as transposable elements—often described as “jumping genes”—have been able to copy themselves and insert into new locations in a genome. Although nearly half of the human genome bears traces of these elements, most are no longer capable of moving.

A new study highlights an unusual exception: BC200, a small noncoding RNA gene that was incorporated into the genomes of anthropoid primates roughly 40 million years ago and later acquired a role in regulating protein production in neurons. Scientists had assumed that, after being “domesticated” by the genome, BC200 had essentially settled into its new biological role.

Instead, the researchers found evidence that BC200 never completely lost its ability to move.

By analyzing primate genomes, they found that BC200 had repeatedly generated new copies over evolutionary time, producing hundreds of lineage-specific insertions. They also identified BC200 insertion variants that exist in some humans but not others—including very recent, individual-specific insertions—suggesting that the element may still be capable of moving today.

The most striking discovery came from molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV), a human-specific poxvirus. The researchers found two copies of the human BC200 sequence inside the viral genome. Their analysis suggests that these copies were acquired through the activity of LINE-1, another mobile genetic element, probably during relatively recent human evolution, potentially within the last 160,000 years.

Ancient genome function persists despite frequent mutations, centromere study shows

Every time a cell divides, its chromosomes must be distributed correctly between the two daughter cells. Central to this process is the centromere, a specialized region of the chromosome. The centromere serves as the attachment site for the cellular machinery that pulls the chromosomes apart.

Centromeres thus perform an essential function in cell division that emerged very early in eukaryotic evolution. Remarkably, although this function has been retained over almost 2 billion years of evolution, the DNA sequences underlying centromeres have evolved at an extraordinarily rapid rate. An international team led by Dr. Korbinian Schneeberger, a professor and head of the Institute of Crop Biology at HHU, has now discovered how relatively small mutations can give rise to the enormous differences between centromeres. Their paper is published in Nature.

While the fundamental function of centromeres is highly conserved, their DNA sequences are not: Centromeres can differ dramatically between species and even between individuals of the same species. This apparent contradiction is known in biology as the “centromere paradox” and raises the question of how a structure that has retained such an ancient function can contain DNA that changes so rapidly.

Backwards Orbit of Small Exoplanet Defies Formation Theories

Exoplanet GJ 3,090 b’s “backwards” orbit challenges current theories, suggesting it formed from a misaligned dust disk rather than violent collisions. [ https://www.labroots.com/trending/space/31093/backwards-orbi…theories-2](https://www.labroots.com/trending/space/31093/backwards-orbi…theories-2)


What can a backwards orbiting exoplanet teach astronomers about the formation and evolution of exoplanets? This is what a recent study published in Astronomy and Astrophysics hopes to address as a team of scientists investigated a new type of exoplanet that defies longstanding theories. This study has the potential to challenge longstanding models about the formation and evolution of exoplanets and what this could mean for finding life beyond Earth.

For the study, the researchers examined the exoplanet GJ 3,090 b, which is a Neptune-like exoplanet orbiting an M-type star about 73 light-years from Earth and whose radius and mass are about 2.2 and 4.5 of Earth, respectively. M-type stars are smaller and cooler than our Sun, and what makes GJ 3,090 b unique is it is the first discovered exoplanet orbiting an M-type star whose orbit is the opposite of the star’s rotation, also known as a retrograde planet.

While retrograde planets have been found to occur from the gravitational tug from another star or another larger planet. However, the researchers found no evidence of either being responsible for GJ 3,090 b’s unusual orbit, and they propose that GJ 3,090 b’s orbit could have originated early in its system’s history from a second disk of gas and dust whose orientation was different than the first disk.

Solar system built its first bodies from fire, not ice

Iron meteorites reveal the solar system’s earliest planetesimals were up to 92% heat-forged chondrules, not icy dust. [ https://www.labroots.com/trending/space/31088/solar-system-b…fire-ice-2](https://www.labroots.com/trending/space/31088/solar-system-b…fire-ice-2)


What processes are responsible for the first planets in our solar system forming? This is what a recent study published in Nature Astronomy hopes to address as a team of scientists from the United States and Germany investigated the complex geological processes that formed the first planetesimals, or young planets, in our early solar system. This study has the potential to help scientists better understand the formation and evolution of the solar system’s first planets and what this could mean for finding life beyond Earth.

For the study, the researchers conducted a series of geochemical analyses on iron meteorites to ascertain the geochemical composition of their original state billions of years ago, specifically the silicate (volcanic) rock called chondrules that comprise space rocks. This is because the rocks have melted and eroded so much over time, so the researchers have to examine radioactive isotopes to ascertain the composition of the parent body the meteorites broke away from.

The primary motivation behind the study was to fill a longstanding knowledge gap regarding how the first planets, also called planetesimals, formed and evolved. In the end, the researchers found that the first planetesimals were formed from hot impacts, as opposed to longstanding hypotheses that they formed from icy materials.

GCAP Electronics Evolution Receives Contract to Deliver Sensing and Communications Capability to Next-generation Fighter Aircraft

As a strategic enabling partner to Edgewing, the consortium will deliver information superiority for the future complex and contested airspace.

A new contract has been awarded to the companies of the GCAP Electronics Evolution (G2E) consortium – the international collaboration between the national defence electronics champions for Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom – to further develop the integrated sensing and communications for the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP).

The 18-month contract was awarded by Edgewing – the joint venture established by Leonardo S.p. A., Japan Aircraft Industrial Enhancement Co. Ltd. (JAIEC) and BAE Systems plc that is responsible for the design and development of the sixth-generation GCAP fighter aircraft. It follows the signing of a contract between Edgewing and the GCAP Agency, the government entity that manages GCAP on behalf of the three nations.

CAIVdirected smallmolecule shuttle enables targeted brain delivery of biologics Chemical Biology

After AAV directed evolution led to discovery of a new blood-brain-barrier (BBB) receptor (carbonic anhydrase IV) which facilitates transcytosis, Ding et al. linked a small molecule binder of CA-IV to antibodies, allowing the antibodies to traverse the BBB. This is a major advance since it represents the first time that a receptor target discovered via AAV directed evolution has been adapted to transport other types of molecules across the BBB.


Existing receptor targets to direct delivery of biologics across the blood−brain barrier are ubiquitously expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral tissues. Now, carbonic anhydrase IV (CA-IV) is identified as a brain-enriched receptor, enabling selective and prolonged delivery of large molecules to the CNS through conjugation of a small molecule targeting CA-IV.

ASTRID traces 13.5 billion years of black hole and galaxy evolution

In dark skies at night, distant starlight twinkles and speaks to vast cosmic histories almost as old as time itself. New data from instruments such as NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope are helping astrophysicists probe deep cosmic mysteries, including the evolution of black holes and galaxies.

Using supercomputers to help make sense of the data, researchers from multiple institutions worked together to complete the largest cosmological hydrodynamic simulation, called ASTRID—a mind-boggling computational run that traces the evolution of the universe from its earliest times to the present.

Your Mother’s Age May Leave a Biological Mark That Lasts for Generations

Maternal age effects may arise from reversible epigenetic changes whose impact depends partly on genetics and evolutionary pressures.

A mother’s age can leave a biological imprint on her offspring, influencing physical and behavioral traits across many animal species, including humans. These so-called maternal age effects are widespread, but scientists still do not fully understand the biological mechanisms behind them or why evolution has allowed them to persist.

“Maternal age effects are incredibly common, from invertebrates up through humans, elephants, other primates and other mammals,” said Kristin Gribble, an associate scientist in the Bay Paul Center at the Marine Biological Laboratory. “Nearly all forms of life show some level of maternal age effect, and most are negative effects caused by advanced maternal age.”

From Darwin to Derrida: evolution as interpretation

One of the first commandments of my scientific education was ‘thou shalt not use teleological language.’ This was closely related to a second commandment ‘thou shalt not commit anthropomorphism’. It was permissible to compare a frog to a machine but not to a human being (unless one also compared the human being to a machine). Biology did not concern itself with questions of value, purpose, and meaning. These were the province of flakey disciplines such as the humanities, social science, or religion. Asking ‘why’ rather than ‘how’ was unscientific, perhaps even sinful. In my book Darwin to Derrida, I offer an extended defense of the use of teleological reasoning in biology. The physical universe is a world without values. But meaning and purpose are the defining features of living things, they do things for good reasons because there are things in the world that they value. Biologists should not be ashamed of the difference.

Darwinian paradigm min

SUGGESTED READING The fight for the future of biology By Denis Noble

Teleology comes from the Greek telos, something at the end, which was translated into Latin as causa finalis, and from thence into English as final cause. The final cause was that ‘for the sake of which’ an action was performed or ‘for the sake of which’ a thing existed. Final causes have been rejected as unscientific because a cause cannot come after its effect. But there is no backward causation when we act with intention. We form a plan which we attempt to implement. The intention comes before the fruition. There is no guarantee we will succeed. The outcome is not predestined. The same applies to the intentional actions of human beings. One of my favorite passages from Augustine is this: