Toggle light / dark theme

Mathematical approach makes uncertainty in AI quantifiable

How reliable is artificial intelligence, really? An interdisciplinary research team at TU Wien has developed a method that allows for the exact calculation of how reliably a neural network operates within a defined input domain. In other words: It is now possible to mathematically guarantee that certain types of errors will not occur—a crucial step forward for the safe use of AI in sensitive applications.

From smartphones to self-driving cars, AI systems have become an everyday part of our lives. But in applications where safety is critical, one central question arises: Can we guarantee that an AI system won’t make serious mistakes—even when its input varies slightly?

A team from TU Wien—Dr. Andrey Kofnov, Dr. Daniel Kapla, Prof. Efstathia Bura and Prof. Ezio Bartocci—bringing together experts from mathematics, statistics and computer science, has now found a way to analyze neural networks, the brains of AI systems, in such a way that the possible range of outputs can be exactly determined for a given input range—and specific errors can be ruled out with certainty.

The Path to Medical Superintelligence

Microsoft says it has developed an AI system that creates a ‘path to medical superintelligence’ that can deal with ‘diagnostically complex and intellectually demanding’ cases and diagnose disease four times more accurately than a panel of human doctors.

[ https://microsoft.ai/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/MAI-Dx-Orche…0x1498.jpg https://microsoft.ai/new/the-path-to-medical-superintelligence/

[ https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22405](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.

“Benchmarked against real-world case records published each week in the New England Journal of Medicine, we show that the Microsoft AI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI-DxO) correctly diagnoses up to 85% of NEJM case proceedings, a rate more than four times higher than a group of experienced physicians. MAI-DxO also gets to the correct diagnosis more cost-effectively than physicians.”

AI that thinks like a doctor: a new era in medical diagnosis.

Imagine walking into a doctor’s office with a strange set of symptoms. Rather than jumping to conclusions, the doctor carefully asks questions, orders tests, and adjusts their thinking at every step based on what they learn. This back-and-forth process—called sequential diagnosis—is what real-world medicine is all about. But most AI systems haven’t been tested this way. Until now.

A new benchmark called Sequential Diagnosis is flipping the script.

Why human empathy still matters in the age of AI

A new international study finds that people place greater emotional value on empathy they believe comes from humans—even when the exact same response is generated by artificial intelligence.

Published in Nature Human Behaviour, the study involved over 6,000 participants across nine experiments.

The researchers, led by Prof. Anat Perry from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and her Ph.D. student Matan Rubin, in collaboration with Prof. Amit Goldenberg, with researchers from Harvard University and Prof. Desmond C. Ong, from the University of Texas, tested whether people perceived empathy differently depending on whether it was labeled as coming from a human or from an AI chatbot.

AI matches doctors in mapping lung tumors for radiation therapy

In radiation therapy, precision can save lives. Oncologists must carefully map the size and location of a tumor before delivering high-dose radiation to destroy cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue. But this process, called tumor segmentation, is still done manually, takes time, varies between doctors—and can lead to critical tumor areas being overlooked.

Now, a team of Northwestern Medicine scientists has developed an AI tool called iSeg that not only matches doctors in accurately outlining on CT scans but can also identify areas that some doctors may miss, reports a large new study.

Unlike earlier AI tools that focused on static images, iSeg is the first 3D deep learning tool shown to segment tumors as they move with each breath—a critical factor in planning , which half of all cancer patients in the U.S. receive during their illness.

Tesla Responds w/ Huge Hardware Change to Improve Autonomy

Questions to inspire discussion.

🚕 Q: How reliable is Tesla’s robotaxi service based on recent experiences? A: Tesla’s robotaxi service has perfect rides in 9 out of 10 experiences, with one incident of phantom braking due to sun glare.

📱 Q: How do users access and pay for Tesla’s robotaxi service? A: Users access the service through a separate app from the Tesla app, requiring Tesla sign-in and linked credit card information for payment.

Tesla Model Updates and Pricing.

🔋 Q: What changes were made to the refreshed Model S and X? A: The refresh includes new hardware for improved autonomy, new color options, wheel design, and ambient lighting, with a $5,000 price increase and 5–7% range increase.

🛡️ Q: What does Tesla’s new extended warranty plan offer? A: Tesla’s plan extends coverage for 4 years or 100,000 miles at $50–150 per month depending on the model, covering most manufactured parts except the high-voltage battery, tires, and glass.

CNBS Tesla Robotaxi Backfire + Ford CEO Gets OWNED After LiDAR Comment

Tesla’s autonomous driving technology, particularly its vision-only approach, is being showcased and defended in response to criticism from Ford’s CEO and others, who prefer LiDAR-based solutions ## Questions to inspire discussion.

Tesla’s Autonomous Technology.

🚗 Q: How does Tesla’s autonomous vehicle technology differ from competitors? A: Tesla uses a vision-only approach without LiDAR, while competitors like Waymo rely on LiDAR and radar systems.

🔄 Q: What makes Tesla’s approach to autonomous vehicles more scalable? A: Tesla aims to make all 8 million+ vehicles on the road capable of self-driving with a software update, unlike competitors focusing on specific areas.

Market Comparison.

📊 Q: How does Tesla’s autonomous vehicle fleet compare to Waymo’s? A: Tesla has over 8 million vehicles capable of autonomy, while Waymo has less than 2,000 vehicles on the road.

/* */