Integrating large language models into search engines could mean a fivefold increase in computing power and huge carbon emissions.
IN EARLY FEBRUARY.
But the excitement over these new tools could be concealing a dirty secret.
Enhancers change rapidly during evolution, but the mechanisms by which new enhancers originate in the genome are mostly unknown. Not all regions of the genome evolve at the same rate and mutations are elevated at late DNA replication time. To understand the role played by mutational processes in enhancer evolution, we leveraged changes in mutation rates across the genome. By examining enhancer turnover in matched healthy and tumor samples in human individuals, we find while enhancers are most common in early replicating regions, new enhancers emerged more often at late replicating regions. Somatic mutations in cancer are consistently elevated in enhancers that have experienced turnover compared to those that are maintained. A similar relationship with DNA replication time is observed in enhancers across mammalian species and in multiple tissue-types. New enhancers appeared almost twice as often in late compared to early replicating regions, independent of transposable elements. We trained a deep learning model to show that new enhancers are enriched for mutations that modify transcription factor (TF) binding. New enhancers are also typically neutrally evolving, enriched in eQTLs, and are more tissue-specific than evolutionarily conserved enhancers. Accordingly, transcription factors that bind to these enhancers, inferred by their binding sequences, are also more recently evolved and more tissue-specific in gene expression. These results demonstrate a relationship between mutation rate, DNA replication time and enhancer evolution across multiple time scales, suggesting these observations are time-invariant principles of genome evolution.
The authors have declared no competing interest.
In 2021, Carbon Robotics unveiled the third-generation of its Autonomous Weeder, a smart farming robot that identifies weeds and then destroys them with high-power lasers. The company now has taken the technology from that robot and built a pull-behind LaserWeeder — and it kills twice as many weeds.
The weedkiller challenge: Weeds compete with plants for space, sunlight, and soil nutrients. They can also make it easier for insect pests to harm crops, so weed control is a top concern for farmers.
Chemical herbicides can kill the pesky plants, but they can also contaminate water and affect soil health. Weeds can be pulled out by hand, but it’s unpleasant work, and labor shortages are already a huge problem in the agriculture industry.
Forbes writer Kenrick Cai joins “Forbes Talks” to discuss his landmark report on how generative artificial intelligence will reshape the economy and the world.
Read the full story on Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrickcai/2023/02/02/things-yo…b4aebb5e31
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&ut…ytdescript.
Stay Connected.
Forbes newsletters: https://newsletters.editorial.forbes.com.
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes.
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes.
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes.
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com.
“This kind of artificial intelligence that we are currently talking about can sometimes lead to something we call hallucination,” he told the German newspaper.
He added: “This is then expressed in such a way that a machine provides a convincing but completely fictitious answer.”
On Monday Google used a presentation to unveil its AI chatbot called Bard that it hopes will rival ChatGPT.