In an era when social media blurs the line between public and private speech, how do people decide whether to speak their minds or stay silent?

A new study from researchers at Arizona State University and the University of Michigan, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, offers a groundbreaking look at the strategic trade-offs individuals make when facing the threat of punishment for dissent.

The work, co-authored by Professor Stephanie Forrest and Assistant Professor Joshua J. Daymude in the School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, part of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU, and Robert Axelrod from the University of Michigan, introduces a mathematical model to explain when people choose to express dissent or self-censor.