What is the red line in the ability to imitate or simulate the commonly recognizable characteristics of a popular or non-popular person when we seek to assess the potential for unethical persuasion of technologies like GenAI?
What responsibility does the creator bear for the intrinsic consequences related to the unethical use of a person’s identity as a lever of persuasion through technology?
Persuasion has no dark side per se: only the intentions of those who wield it do, and GenAI is not inherently endowed with such intentions, neither for itself nor by itself.
Leave a reply