This article is based on accredited medical, science, and media reports. Disclaimer: I am not a scientist. I will share knowledge but will offer no personal opinion on this matter herein.
All listed theories and facts shared within this article are fully-attributed to said outlets, including Wikipedia.org, NeuroscienceNews.com, and TheDailyBrief.com.
The origins and workings of consciousness have remained among science’s greatest unanswered mysteries. How did it begin? What sparks it?
Dr. Aaron Adair Dr. Aaron Adair’s Links:
His book — https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FH46NC8/ref=dbs_a_def_r…atfound-20
His website — https://draaronadair.com/
His Twitter — https://twitter.com/adair_aaron?lang=en.
YouTube — @AaronAdair =====================================================================
**RECOMMENDED ONLINE COURSES HERE**Sign up here for Dr. M. David Litwa’s course — The Ancient Greek Mysteries & Christianity — - https://mythvisionpodcast.com/mysterycultsSign up here for Dr. Dale C. Allison Jr’s course — The Quest For The Historical Jesus — - www.mythvisionpodcast.com/jesus-questSign up for Dr. Bart D. Ehrman’s course — Other Virgin Births In Antiquity — - https://www.mythvisionpodcast.com/virginsSign up for the 7 hour resurrection debate between Dr’s Bart Ehrman & Mike Licona here — - https://www.mythvisionpodcast.com/resurrectionSign up for Dr. Bart D. Ehrman’s Genesis “In The Beginning” Webinar here — - https://www.mythvisionpodcast.com/genesisSign up for Dr. Bart D. Ehrman’s Christmas Webinar here — - https://www.mythvisionpodcast.com/christmasSign up for Dr. Bart D. Ehrman’s Did Jesus call himself God webinar — - https://www.mythvisionpodcast.com/bart.
==========================================================================
**GET RECOMMENDED BOOKS HERE: 👉 https://amzn.to/35FqNYf.
==========================================================================
Please consider helping support MythVision’s work by joining the Patreon or contributing a one-time donation through my links below: MythVision Website: 🔥 https://mythvisionpodcast.com/
MythVision Patreon: 👉 https://www.patreon.com/mythvision.
MythVision Paypal: 👉 https://www.paypal.me/dereklambert7
Cashapp: 👉 $rewiredaddiction.
Venmo: 👉 @Derek-Lambert-9
Email MythVision: 👉 [email protected].
Facebook page: 👉 https://www.facebook.com/MythVision/
Facebook group: 👉 https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheWaterBoyZRadio/
Twitter: 👉 https://twitter.com/DerekPodcast.
TikTok: 👉 https://www.tiktok.com/@mythvision/
Instagram: 👉 https://www.instagram.com/dereklambert_7/
Discord: 👉 https://discord.gg/dRQXdZBq6E
==========================================================================
👉 👉 Checkout Our Other YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/ @mythvisionclips 👉 👉 Checkout MVP Courses to find new and upcoming online courses:
https://mvp-courses.com/
==========================================================================
#science #religion #mythvision #mythvisionpodcast #mvp #dereklambert
However, some journals allow researchers to use AI to improve the readability and language of the research.
ChatGPT, the conversational chatbot from OpenAI might have authored many poems, essays, and even pieces of code so far but is unlikely to get author credit for a peer-reviewed paper anytime soon.
Major science publishing houses like Springer Nature and Elsevier have specified that they will not consider ChatGPT as an author in their publications, The Guardian reported on Thursday.
The early 1900s was an amazing time for Western science, as Albert Einstein was developing his theories of relativity and psychology was born, as Sigmund Freud and psychoanalysis took over the scientific mainstream. Karl Popper observed these developments firsthand and came to draw a distinction between what he referred to as science and pseudoscience, which might best be summarized as science disconfirms, while pseudoscience confirms. While the way we describe these disciplines has changed in the intervening years, Popper’s ideas speak to the heart of how we arrive at knowledge.
–
Wanted: Santa Clause by Kevin Dooley https://www.flickr.com/photos/pagedooley/3124443099, licensed under CC BY 2.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer copyright Rankin/Bass Productions & DreamWorks Classics.
Other images and video via VideoBlocks or Wikimedia Commons, licensed under Creative Commons by 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios.
Crash Course Philosophy is sponsored by Squarespace.
http://www.squarespace.com/crashcourse.
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook — http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashC… — http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr — http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support CrashCourse on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: https://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids.
Twitter — http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse.
Tumblr — http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com.
Support CrashCourse on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse.
Posted in science
Pseudo-science theories are a little like puppies. They’re fun, fluffy things to talk about, and most of the time they’re harmless. Sometimes, however, they get big, mean, aggressive, and have to be put down.
Support me at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/sciencephiletheai.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sciencephile/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Sciencephile_
Music: Mozart KV 333, Piano Sonata No 13 I in Bb.
Further reading:
SpaceX signed a new agreement with the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) to prevent Starlink satellites from interfering with astronomy.
SpaceX has long been criticized by astronomers for the brightness of its Starlink satellites. Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, said in 2019 that SpaceX would ensure that Starlink has no material effect on discoveries in astronomy. “We care a great deal about science,” he said in a tweet.
Exactly, potentially helping billions of economically disadvantaged people is the greater good. That said, we’ll make sure Starlink has no material effect on discoveries in astronomy. We care a great deal about science.
Uncover the truth behind the human lifespan. From Ancient Rome to modern America, discover the progress we’ve made in extending life expectancy and the flaws in measuring it. Join us as we explore the science of aging, the pursuit of immortality, and the ongoing debate on the limits of human longevity.
The study is being funded by the U.S. Army and Air Force.
Researchers at the Case Western Reserve University in the U.S. are currently working toward an experiment that will record something that has never been captured at such a resolution before; the moment of impact when a projectile traveling at 9,000 miles (14,484 km) an hour hits a wall of water, a press release said.
Research of this nature has been done earlier, but that was nearly eight decades ago. Back in the 1940s, the U.S. military conducted such studies to gauge the impact of shockwaves from underwater explosions on boats and submarines.
The Daily.
Bryan Schmidt, an assistant professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Case Western Reserve University, expects that the upcoming experiments will be twice as fast as what has previously been studied, and the recording equipment is far superior now.
Why the slide?
It is important to understand the reasons for the drastic changes, Walsh says. The trend might stem in part from changes in the scientific enterprise. For example, there are now many more researchers than in the 1940s, which has created a more competitive environment and raised the stakes to publish research and seek patents. That, in turn, has changed the incentives for how researchers go about their work. Large research teams, for example, have become more common, and Wang and his colleagues have found3 that big teams are more likely to produce incremental than disruptive science.
Finding an explanation for the decline won’t be easy, Walsh says. Although the proportion of disruptive research dropped significantly between 1945 and 2010, the number of highly disruptive studies has remained about the same. The rate of decline is also puzzling: CD indices fell steeply from 1945 to 1970, then more gradually from the late 1990s to 2010. “Whatever explanation you have for disruptiveness dropping off, you need to also make sense of it levelling off” in the 2000s, he says.
