Archive for the ‘futurism’ category: Page 623
Nov 27, 2018
Burial sites from 5th and 6th centuries yield unexpected treasures
Posted by Genevieve Klien in category: futurism
Nov 26, 2018
People can sustainably share resources, under some conditions
Posted by Xavier Rosseel in category: futurism
That’s why freedom of movement is one of the key conditions necessary to successfully share resources. Other necessary conditions include low population densities, low market value of the resources, variability in resource distribution and an ethos of sharing.
Sometimes, there is no “tragedy” in the tragedy of the commons, according to a new analysis that challenges a widely accepted theory.
Scientists have long believed that when there is open access to a shared resource, people will inevitably overuse it, leading to ruin for everyone—an idea known as the “tragedy of the commons.”
Continue reading “People can sustainably share resources, under some conditions” »
Nov 26, 2018
I think this is precisely why he built the BFR lol
Posted by Mary Jain in category: futurism
Nov 26, 2018
You Can Now Pick Your Baby’s Eye Color Before You’re Even Pregnant
Posted by Shane Hinshaw in category: futurism
Nov 26, 2018
RegenerAge — Bioquark — Excélsior TV
Posted by Ira S. Pastor in categories: aging, bioengineering, biotech/medical, business, cryonics, DNA, futurism, genetics, health, transhumanism
Nov 25, 2018
Plant-based milk alternatives disrupt dairy
Posted by Shailesh Prasad in category: futurism
Nov 25, 2018
6.4-magnitude earthquake hits western Iran: Iran institute
Posted by Genevieve Klien in category: futurism
A strong 6.4-magnitude earthquake hit Iran’s western province of Kermanshah late Sunday, Iran’s institute of geophysics said.
Nov 25, 2018
China’s destructive laser rifle has a half-mile range
Posted by Shane Hinshaw in category: futurism
China has built the world’s first destructive laser, capable of setting clothes on fire and detonating fuel tanks- but it can’t kill people- yet.
In another universe is there an identical you sat at an identical desk, reading this identical question?