A newly identified protein pathway may link blood-brain barrier deterioration to age-related cognitive decline.
“IWMT and Human Consciousness Hypothesis”
A talk by Adam Safron, Victoria Klimaj and Zahra Sheikhbahaee recorded live at the AAAI 2026 conference.
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of ceperognastat in participants with early symptomatic AD was conducted at 72 centers in Australia, Canada, Japan, Poland, and the US from September 2021 to July 2025. The study adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki20 and other international guidelines. All participants provided written, informed consent before any study-related procedures. The study followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline.21 The protocol was approved by an ethics committee at each participating center, and unblinded safety data were reviewed approximately every 3 months by an independent unblinded external data and safety monitoring committee. Participants were compensated for study participation. The study protocol and statistical analysis plan are provided in Supplements 1 and 2, respectively.
Eligible participants were aged 60 to 85 years and had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 22 to 30, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) Global Score of 0.5 or 1 with a memory box score greater than or equal to 0.5, elevated plasma level of tau phosphorylated at residue 217 (p-tau217), and evidence of elevated brain tau levels by flortaucipir F18 positron emission tomography (PET) scan at the time of screening. Demographic information, including race and ethnicity, was collected to allow for characterization of potential differences in treatment effects by demographic characteristic. Race and ethnicity were self-reported by participants based on fixed categories. All study participants and study staff were blinded to treatment assignment during the treatment phase.
Everyone talks about the #Singularity. Almost nobody agrees on what it actually means.
Fourteen years ago, I stopped and collected the definitions. Not two or three. Seventeen of them. Turing. Von Neumann. I.J. Good. Vinge. Kurzweil. Bostrom. Plus a few names most people have never heard.
I expected them to line up. They didn’t. Some contradict each other outright. The one word we’ve built entire movements, companies, and fortunes on turns out to mean wildly different things depending on who is holding it.
And I wrote this before ChatGPT. Before the current #AI gold rush. Before “superintelligence” became a line in quarterly earnings calls.
Read all seventeen, then tell me which one you would bet your future on. Or give me an eighteenth.
A drone that spins 25 times a second can avoid being spotted by becoming nothing more than a vague blur – though the creators admit that it can still be easily heard
LONDON — Blood-based biomarker (BBM) testing may enable primary care physicians (PCPs) to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as accurately as dementia specialists, potentially expanding access to accurate diagnosis beyond memory clinics, new research suggests.
In a prospective study of more than 1,300 patients, PCPs achieved 93% diagnostic accuracy after reviewing BBM results, which was comparable to the 94% accuracy of dementia specialists. The test also changed clinicians’ diagnoses and management plans in a substantial proportion of cases.
“By equipping primary care practitioners with blood test results, we see that they’re as accurate as dementia experts in definitely ruling out [AD],” study investigator Sebastian Palmqvist, MD, PhD, senior consultant neurologist and associate professor, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, told Medscape Medical News.