Toggle light / dark theme

Simplifying complex ideas in sketches

What would you see if you tried to travel alongside a light wave at the speed of light? And suppose you held a mirror in front of you as you zipped along. What would you see in the mirror? This and similar thought experiments were posed by the young Albert Einstein to himself in his teens. It’s come to be known as Einstein’s Mirror and is also the title of a popular book on relativity. It would at first seem that light, reflected off your face, could never reach the mirror to, in turn, reflect back into your eyes to see it. So what would you see? It was only years later that Einstein developed a theory that answered this puzzle. And it required some fundamental adjustments to how we understood the world, which still bend my mind to think about them. These include: You can’t travel at the speed of light. Time is not fixed; it is relative. The speed of light is a universal constant—it is the same, independent of the motion of the source. Einstein wrote: “After ten years of reflection, such a principle resulted from a paradox upon which I had already hit at the age of sixteen: If I pursue a beam of light with the velocity c [the velocity of light in a vacuum], I should observe such a beam of light as a spatially oscillatory electromagnetic field at rest. However, there seems to be no such thing…” — Autobiographical notes, 1949 I’ll try to explain a little as I understand it. Our usual experience is that velocities are additive. Suppose I am on a moving train carriage and I throw a ball from the back of the carriage to the front. For an observer outside the train, that ball moves at the speed of the train plus the speed of the ball relative to me. But light behaves differently. As you approach the speed of light, the energy required to keep accelerating approaches infinity. In effect, you can’t reach the speed of light. So an observer of a flying Einstein wouldn’t see light travelling from him to the mirror at twice the speed of light. What changes is time. For the high-speed Einstein, the light would appear to travel away from him to the mirror and back at its usual immense speed. However, for an observer, what would only seem a moment for the high-speed Einstein might take years for the rest of us—the experience of time changes with velocity. It’s a remarkable turn for a simple and fascinating question. It’s amazing to me that the young Einstein would both pose this question, continue work on it, and then think to question some of the most self-evident facts of our world as we experience it: that time is not fixed, that a speed cannot be reached, and of course, ultimately, that energy is matter. The book Einstein’s Mirror is co-authored by my Dad (respect!). It’s full of photographs, fascinating stories, and the characters that moved physics forward. It includes the people, events and science central to another of Christopher Nolan’s films, Oppenheimer. Perhaps Christopher read it 🤔 Related Ideas to Einstein’s Mirror Also see: Laplace’s Demon Redshift Looking back in time The Doppler Effect Sonic Boom The most beautiful equation — Earlier this year, we attended a showing of Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar at the Royal Albert Hall in London with Hans Zimmer’s soundtrack played by a live orchestra. It was a fantastic way to experience a remarkable film—a film that manages to make black holes, wormholes, and time slippage both understandable (largely) and part of the plot. It strikes me as an astonishing achievement for a mainstream film.

1 Comment so far

  1. We have to be very careful when we talk about Einsteins ideas:

    Physic/Philosophy did not introduce a definition for TIME — up to now. Without a clear definition we do not know at all — what TIME is.

    With calculations which are based on Einsteins ideas it is possible to calculate — if ´time-travelling´ is possible. Here we have two problems: A) up to now we have no definition about the nature of time — therefore such calculations are doubtful. We can not calculate TIME as long as we do not know what it is. B) PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE are only ideas of our phantasy/imagination. And mathematics which allow to calculate travelling to destinations which exist only in our imagination — is of a very doubful quality

    From clocks we can read only calendar-data — because they are built to display it.

    Experiments showed that the display of clocks will slow down — when we move the clock down towards a mass, e.g. down to earth. And the movement of the clocks will increase when we move clocks away fom masses. This is the reason for the idea ´Time is relative´.

    The problem with this idea is — that we have to observe strict rules when we use clocks as a gauge (German: Messgerät)! It is allowed to use a gauge only for places/situations for which it was calibrated. Otherwise the measurement is wrong!
    Therefore the idea ´time is relative´ is doubtful.

Leave a Comment

Lifeboat Foundation respects your privacy! Your email address will not be published.

/* */