Toggle light / dark theme

Morphological characteristics of healthy and aneurysmal internal carotid artery bifurcations

Internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation (ICAB) aneurysms carry high rupture risk, treatment challenges, and recurrence due to complex morphology and origination patterns. Given their relatively low incidence, research on ICAB morphology is limited. This study analyzed ICAB morphology in aneurysmal, contralateral, and healthy bifurcations, highlighting bilateral differences, anterior cerebral artery (ACA) dominance, and deviations from the vascular optimality principle (VOP).

A total of 194 angiographic volumes (40 aneurysmal, 28 contralateral, 126 healthy) were evaluated. ICAB morphology included parent/daughter vessel diameters and angle between the ICA and middle cerebral artery (MCA; ФMCA), angle between the ICA and ACA (ФACA), total ICAB angle (ФICAB; ФMCA + ФACA). Aneurysm characteristics (size, neck, origination) and VOP parameters (radius ratio [RR] and junction exponent [n]) were evaluated. Bilateral analysis accounted for ACA dominance.

Compared with controls, aneurysmal ICABs exhibited wider ΦMCA (57.22° ± 12.22° vs 43.74° ± 9.41°, p < 0.001; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83) and ΦICAB (160.27° ± 16.16° vs 143.66° ± 10.74°, p < 0.001; AUC = 0.79), but not ΦACA, in univariate, multivariate (AUC = 0.85), and bilateral analyses. Angle thresholds of 51.7° for ΦMCA and 152.4° for ΦICAB were identified. Aneurysms originated predominantly off the apex (65%) and ACA (30%). Most occurred on ICABs with dominant (31%) and codominant (58%) A1 segments. Aneurysm neck, but not size, correlated with ΦMCA and ΦICAB, but not ΦACA. In controls, ΦMCA was larger and ΦACA smaller on the dominant A1 side, with no ΦICAB difference. There was no statistically significant difference in RR and n values regardless of aneurysm presence and dominance status.

Leave a Comment

Lifeboat Foundation respects your privacy! Your email address will not be published.

/* */