Questions to inspire discussion.
🤝 Q: What are the potential issues with the Uber-Lucid-Neuro robotaxi partnership? A: The partnership is a “cluster f waiting to happen” due to independent entities involved, which typically end in a “messy divorce”, making it potentially uncompetitive against fully integrated solutions like Tesla’s.
🗺️ Q: How does Tesla’s robotaxi service area expansion compare to Waymo’s? A: Tesla expanded its service area in 22 days, while Waymo’s first service area expansion in Austin, Texas took 4 months and 13 days, demonstrating Tesla’s faster and more aggressive approach to expansion.
Business Viability.
💼 Q: What concerns exist about the Uber-Lucid-Neuro robotaxi partnership’s business case? A: While considered a “breakout moment” for autonomous vehicles, the business case and return on investment for the service remain unclear, according to former Ford CEO Mark Fields.
🏭 Q: What manufacturing advantage does Tesla have in the robotaxi market? A: Tesla’s fully vertically integrated approach and ability to mass-manufacture Cyber Cabs at a scale of tens of thousands per month gives it a significant cost-per-mile advantage over competitors using more expensive, non-specialized vehicles. ## Key Insights.
Business Strategy and Competition.
🚗 Lucid’s $80-$100,000 Gravity SUV for Uber’s robo taxi service raises questions about scalability and cost competitiveness against Tesla’s Cyber Cab, designed for low-cost production and operation.
🏭 Tesla’s vertical integration, mass manufacturing, and generalized solution for economy-scale robo taxis give it a significant advantage over competitors like Waymo and Lucid.
Expansion and Growth.
🚀 Waymo’s first expansion in Austin, Texas took 4 months and 13 days, while Tesla’s expansion took 22 days, indicating Tesla’s faster-moving approach in the robo taxi market.
Financial Challenges.
💸 Lucid is burning money at a staggering rate due to low vehicle sales and losses per vehicle, likely leading to continued capital raising and shareholder dilution.
Partnership Dynamics.
🤝 The partnership between Uber, Lucid, and Neuro is described as a “cluster waiting to happen” due to the independent entities involved, potentially leading to a messy divorce in the future.
Market Viability.
📊 The business case for Uber’s robo taxi service using Lucid’s Gravity SUV is unclear, as the high vehicle and technology costs may make it difficult to compete on cost per mile with Tesla’s Cyber Cab.
[#Vehicles](https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Vehicles&src=hashtag_click) [#Tesla](https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Tesla&src=hashtag_click) [#Lucid](https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Lucid&src=hashtag_click) [#Uber](https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Uber&src=hashtag_click) [#Neuro](https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Neuro&src=hashtag_click)
XMentions:
[@Tesla](https://twitter.com/@Tesla) [@HabitatsDigital](https://twitter.com/@HabitatsDigital) [@StevenMarkRyan](https://twitter.com/@StevenMarkRyan)
More:
(https://digitalhabitats.global/blogs/digital-vehicles/your-m…n-one-gulp)
Waymo is rapidly expanding its robotaxi service, challenging Tesla’s dominance in the market and putting pressure on its autonomous capabilities, with strategic partnerships and investments fueling its growth Questions to inspire discussion.
Robotaxi Competition 🚗 Q: How does Tesla’s Cyber Cab compare to Lucid’s Gravity SUV for robotaxi services? A: Tesla’s Cyber Cab is a dedicated robo taxi with low production and operation costs, fully vertically integrated, and mass-manufactured at tens of thousands per month, giving it a significant cost-per-mile advantage over Lucid’s $80-$100,000 Gravity SUV, which lacks a dedicated robotaxi design. 🤝 Q: What are the potential issues with the Uber-Lucid-Neuro robotaxi partnership?