Lifeboat Foundation: Safeguarding Humanity
Toggle light / dark theme

Blog – Page 8,663

There is an interesting case of a blockchain engineer and a crime in the article.

A district court in China has reportedly ruled that Ethereum’s cryptocurrency is legal property with economic value. This ruling follows a couple of other verdicts on the legality of cryptocurrency, including bitcoin, by various Chinese courts. While cryptocurrency is not legal tender in China, people can hold and transfer them like property.

The Shenzhen Futian District People’s Court in Guangdong Province, China, has ruled that ether is legal property, protected by Chinese law, local media reported last week. This means that the Chinese are not barred from owning or transferring the cryptocurrency, local publication 8btc explained, adding that according to the court ruling:

The crypto assets represented by ETH have economic value and can be traded publicly.

Read more | >

Dystopia is closer than you think.

This is the short closing speech I delivered at the 2019 Dark Futures meetup in Toronto. Not my finest speech but, since event organizer and futurist Nikolas Badminton kindly gave me a video of my keynote, I thought it may be good to share it publicly and gather your critical feedback. Feel free to post your comments below.

Title: NeoTechnocracy: The Future is Worse than You Think.

Read more | >

Aubrey De Grey and Reason from ’ Fight Aging’:

How can the current public focus on health be leveraged to promote a focus on prevention of disease, and aging as root cause for diseases?

Ole mensching, apollo ventures aubrey de grey, SENS research foundation sonia arrison, 100 plus capital reason, fightaging

Zoom Session Transcriptions: https://otter.ai/s/2brwTOXwS4qcBOe8P_1Jhw

Hivemind | long-term futures in times of acute crisis.

Continue reading “Health & Aging post COVID-19: Ole | Apollo, Aubrey | SENS, Sonia | 100 Plus Capital, Reason | Repair” | >

Indeed, the coronavirus pandemic has wreaked havoc on research around the globe, shuttering laboratories, aborting field projects, and costing scientists months—if not years—of work. Even as labs contemplate reopening—if and when federal and local governments ease lockdown restrictions—the challenges will be enormous. Most will have to operate with just a few individuals at a time, working in shifts. All large gatherings, including lab meetings and lectures, are likely to be prohibited. And there will be stark differences in strategy between fields—and sometimes even within the same building. At the same time, many institutions are still trying to figure out how and whether to test employees for SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus causing the current pandemic, and what to do if infections resurge.

Institutions struggle with—and differ on—the best way to restart science.

Read more | >