And ArsTechnica seems to be totally missing the point as âdelayingâ Starship for SOUND AND PRACTICAL SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS is not âdelayingâ progress and one needs to simply ask why SpaceX âengineersâ canât up their game enough to actually answer or address those legitimate questions? The answer is rather simple, they probably CAN but the person âin chargeâ has no with to, incentive to, or will to do so because he sees anyone that questions him as âunreasonable oppositionâ rather than legitimate concern. Starship could crash and burn on the orbital flight and it would not make a difference at all to the âworldâ in general. We can and have recovered from worse numerous times while advancing technology and transportation. The FACT that Musk, (and his many rapid fans) somehow âassumeâ that he and only he can âadvanceâ space access are very much proof that this is not about engineering, ability or purpose but strictly about ego.
To the FAA, Musk seemed to be saying, federal regulators must do their part to ensure the future arrives on schedule. Just as the 20th-century skyscrapers marked the beginning of a new era and eventually launched America into a prosperous future of finance, communication, marketing, and more, the 21st century now beckons.
The skyscraper age will soon give way to the space age.
Continue reading “With a single photo, SpaceX sent a not-so-subtle message to FAA regulators” »