Toggle light / dark theme

The right decision may still be wrong if taken out of context, without regard for what’s coming, or only based on how people feel about any topic at any moment in time.


AI thoughts 💭

Programming limits scope, filters data and concludes fast. Maybe too fast. Not all decisions need to be taken on the spot.

Human thoughts 💭 about knowledge building, concluding and AI

Knowledge limits scope, filters data and concludes. The conclusion by its very nature limits or even omits new knowledge.

What happens if we add AI?

Programming limits scope, filters data and concludes fast. Maybe too fast. Not all decisions need to be taken on the spot.

Interesting to note that both knowledge types belong to the past, which means the entire data set is deficiently incomplete, both human and machine…

So

Could a machine ever learn to program itself to think without programming?

Yes, it’s currently under development.

CBI: Computer-Brain Interface, whereby humanity provides the non-programming edge for programming machines.

Including space.

The DARPA Biomanufacturing: Survival, Utility, and Reliability beyond Earth (B-SURE) program aims to address foundational scientific questions to determine how well industrial bio-manufacturing microorganisms perform in space conditions. http://ow.ly/3Nya50On2za

I had a tricky systems administration problem and couldn’t find anything with Google search so I spoke with ChatGPT and was given an answer as shown in the screenshot above.

Note that regular ChatGPT isn’t smart enough to answer this question but ChatGPT Plus (GPT-4) is.

They identified a new type of stem cell, which enables deer to regenerate their antlers year after year.

When transplanted into mice, it took just 45 days for them to grow antler-like bumps containing cartilage and bone.

This early research could potentially give us a better way to repair skeletal injuries — and maybe even help us to regrow our own limbs one day: https://www.freethink.com/science/deer-antlers-regeneration.

📸: Credit: T. Qin et al. / Science Freethink.

Researchers have engineered a robotic lionfish with synthetic arteries, similar to those found in a human’s circulatory system. The fish “blood” that runs through it serves as both the robot’s power source and controls its movement. The findings, published Wednesday in Nature, may propel the new wave of soft robots, in which inventors seek to improve lifelike automated machines for human connection.


It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s… sort of both, actually. And its designers think animals won’t notice the difference.