Toggle light / dark theme

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, says it has proof that the Chinese start-up DeepSeek used its technology to create a competing artificial intelligence model — fueling concerns about intellectual property theft in the fast-growing industry.

OpenAI believes DeepSeek, which was founded by math whiz Liang Wenfeng, used a process called “distillation,” which helps make smaller AI models perform better by learning from larger ones.

While this is common in AI development, OpenAI says DeepSeek may have broken its rules by using the technique to create its own AI system.

While DeepSeek makes AI cheaper, seemingly without cutting corners on quality, a group is trying to figure out how to make tests for AI models that are hard enough. It’s ‘Humanity’s Last Exam’

If you’re looking for a new reason to be nervous about artificial intelligence, try this: Some of the smartest humans in the world are struggling to create tests that AI systems can’t pass.

For years, AI systems were measured by giving new models a variety of standardized benchmark tests. Many of these tests consisted of challenging, SAT-calibre problems in areas like math, science and logic. Comparing the models’ scores over time served as a rough measure of AI progress.

Researchers from Zhejiang University and HKUST (Guangzhou) have developed a cutting-edge AI model, ProtET, that leverages multi-modal learning to enable controllable protein editing through text-based instructions. This innovative approach, published in Health Data Science, bridges the gap between biological language and protein sequence manipulation, enhancing functional protein design across domains like enzyme activity, stability, and antibody binding.

Proteins are the cornerstone of biological functions, and their precise modification holds immense potential for medical therapies, , and biotechnology. While traditional protein editing methods rely on labor-intensive laboratory experiments and single-task optimization models, ProtET introduces a transformer-structured encoder architecture and a hierarchical training paradigm. This model aligns protein sequences with natural language descriptions using contrastive learning, enabling intuitive, text-guided protein modifications.

The research team, led by Mingze Yin from Zhejiang University and Jintai Chen from HKUST (Guangzhou), trained ProtET on a dataset of over 67 million protein–biotext pairs, extracted from Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL databases. The model demonstrated exceptional performance across key benchmarks, improving protein stability by up to 16.9% and optimizing catalytic activities and antibody-specific binding.

We could soon live to the age of 150, medics claim.

They say more of us will reach the massive milestone thanks to modern tech, new medicines and healthy living. Longevity medicine expert Dr Debonneuil said: If the current trend continues, we could see individuals living to 140 or 150 in good health.

While that might sound sensational, it’s grounded in science and the longevity field is booming because of these breakthroughs.” Dr Debonneuil spoke after a first-of-its-kind study, Rejuvenation Olympics, produced promising anti-ageing results. He continued: “One of the guys taking part is in his 60’s but biologically he resembles someone in their later 30’s.

Monterey Bay Whale Watch said on Facebook that their scouting boat spotted the dolphins when it went out to “perform a survey on the coast south of Monterey,” about a 120 miles southwest of San Francisco.

The tour agency said its team counted 33 gray whales, 1,500-plus Risso’s dolphins and three northern right whale dolphins as they undertook the 60-mile roundtrip from Monterey to Point Sur.

Our psychological profiles provide clues to our future risk and severity of cognitive decline that may one day inform tailored prevention strategies, a new study suggests.

“The aim was to elucidate how various combinations of psychological characteristics are related to mental, cognitive and brain health,” explains University of Barcelona psychologist David Bartrés-Faz.

“To date, psychological risk and protective factors have been examined almost exclusively independently: this approach is limiting, as psychological characteristics do not exist in isolation.”