NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said the agency will begin building a moon base with near-monthly robotic landings starting in 2027, with astronauts potentially living on the lunar surface for months at a time by the early 2030s.
As quantum computing moves closer to large-scale deployment, new research is examining its future energy, water, and material demands.
David McCollum, an Oak Ridge National Laboratory distinguished scientist, is leading the project. McCollum is also a joint faculty professor in the Center for Energy, Transportation, and Environmental Policy (CETEP) at the Howard H. Baker Jr. School of Public Policy and Public Affairs at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. The work aims to inform the rollout of quantum infrastructure over the coming decades. It examines technologies evolving from experimental environments to commercial-scale use. Quantum computing is expected to unlock advances in drug discovery, material science, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity.
“Quantum computing presents extraordinary opportunities, from accelerating scientific discovery to solving complex optimization problems,” McCollum said. “At the same time, it introduces new questions about the energy, water, and materials required to operate these systems at scale. Our research aims to get ahead of those questions before resource and supply chain constraints start to bite.”
Manuel Blum (Carnegie Mellon University)
https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/man…
The Role of TCS in Modern Machine Learning.
We define the Conscious Turing Machine (CTM), a formal global workspace model of consciousness specified as a 7-tuple. Its 10 million processors self-define a multimodal language, Brainish, together with a dictionary of chunks. Each chunk is a 5-tuple that contains and defines a 2-tuple Brainish word.
Our principal contribution is not theorems—though there is one—but theoretical insights into several central puzzles of consciousness. From this formal definition follow a proposed solution to the binding problem, an explanation of how the suffering of pain is generated, and testable predictions derived from the CTM.
13 years ago, I sat down with Peter Joseph, musician, filmmaker, and founder of the Zeitgeist Movement.
His argument was simple, and uncomfortable: the system we live under (debt-based money, work-for-survival economics, infinite growth on a finite planet) isn’t broken. It’s working exactly as designed. And it’s running out of runway.
In 2013, this sounded radical. In 2026, it sounds like a weather report.
We covered a lot of ground in 75 minutes: the Resource-Based Economy, the role of Artificial Intelligence in managing scarcity, the schism between Zeitgeist and the Venus Project, sustainability, central planning, and the technological singularity itself.
You don’t have to agree with Peter to take the conversation seriously. I don’t agree with all of it. But the questions he was asking back then are the questions we’re being forced to ask now, except we’re asking them in an era when AI systems can actually do things he could only theorize about.
The technology has caught up with the critique. The philosophy hasn’t caught up with the technology.
Insights from the Algonauts 2025 Winners.
https://arxiv.org/html/2508.10784v1
A foundation model of vision, audition, and language for in-silico neuroscience.
https://ai.meta.com/research/publicat…
How to breathe life back into brain theory.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d4158…
A foundation model to predict and capture human cognition.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s4158…
#ai #tech #explained #brain #artificialintelligence
Consider teaching a computer how to read by giving it billions of books. You don’t teach it grammar rules or logic; you simply ask it to play a game: “Look at these words, and guess what word comes next.” To win this game at a world-class level, the computer can’t just memorize phrases. It has to start figuring out how the world works. If it’s reading a mystery novel, it needs to deduce who the killer is to guess the final sentence. If it’s reading a math textbook, it has to understand addition to predict the answer to a problem. This is the core idea explored in a recent scientific paper titled “Algorithmic Compression via Pretrained Neural Networks.”*The researchers look under the hood of today’s Large Language Models (LLMs)—like the AI assistants we use every day—to explain a fascinating mystery: Why does a machine trained merely to predict the next word end up looking like it can think, reason, and solve complex problems? Think about how a ZIP file works on your computer. If you have a massive text file filled with the word “apple” repeated a million times, a compression program won’t save all million words. It will compress it into a short rule: “Repeat ‘apple’ 1,000,000 times.” It turns a massive mountain of data into a tiny, elegant recipe. (learning how to learn). Because the AI is fed a massive, diverse diet of information, it can’t just memorize everything. Instead, it is forced to find the underlying “recipes” or rules behind the data it sees. When you type a prompt into an AI, it doesn’t just look up an answer in a database. It looks at your text, infers the “generative algorithm” (the underlying pattern or logic of what you are asking), and uses that pattern to compress the problem and generate the correct response. In essence, it deduces the hidden rules of the game on the fly. * Discover Complex Logic: When given a sequence of chess moves, the AI doesn’t just guess random moves; it actually reconstructs the abstract rules and evaluations of a chessboard in its digital “mind.” While this framework helps explain why AI is getting so smart, it also opens up big new questions. We know these models are compressing data and finding rules, but we still don’t fully understand the absolute limits of this approach. How close can a practical AI get to that theoretical “perfect” intelligence? What happens when the AI runs out of human data to learn from?
Vitányi was appointed professor of computer science at the University of Amsterdam, and researcher at the National Research Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science in the Netherlands (CWI, initially Mathematical Centre [MC]) where he is currently a CWI Fellow. He was guest professor at the University of Copenhagen in 1978; research associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1985/1986; Gaikoku-Jin Kenkyuin (councilor professor) at INCOCSAT at the Tokyo Institute of Technology in 1998; visiting professor at Boston University in 2004, at Monash University in 1996 and at the National ICT of Australia NICTA at University of New South Wales in 2004/2005; visiting professor at and adjunct professor of computer science at the University of Waterloo from 2005.
KAIST announced on the 2nd that a team led by Professor Jeong Kyun Choi of the Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, in a joint study with the company ‘Neogene Logic,’ has developed a new AI model to predict neoantigens—a key element in developing personalized cancer vaccines—and has identified the importance of B cells in cancer immunotherapy. The research findings were published in the international journal *Science Advances* on December 3.
Neoantigens are protein fragments derived from cancer cell mutations that serve as unique markers distinguishing only cancer cells. Moderna and BioNTech developed their COVID-19 vaccines using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) platform secured during their research on neoantigen-based cancer vaccines. Currently, global pharmaceutical companies are actively conducting clinical trials for cancer vaccines.
The problem is that most existing cancer vaccine technologies focus solely on T-cell-centered immune responses. B cells, along with T cells, play a key role in the immune system, and recent studies have increasingly demonstrated their importance in anti-cancer immune activity.
Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) has been influencing the way oncology has been practiced. Major issues constituting a bottleneck are the lack of data for training purposes, confidentiality preventing development, or the absence of transparency in clarifying how models operate to generate decisions. Novel Models With explainable AI, trust and utilization barriers among clinicians, researchers, and patients can be removed. With the implementation of federated learning, multiple institutions could contribute to crucial dataset’s learning information. Precise diagnosis and prescription of the right drug are essential in preventing unnecessary life losses, and economic burden to the underling system.
New work explaining the inner workings of artificial intelligence could provide a way around the threat of AI “model collapse,” potentially averting growing numbers of AI hallucinations in the future.
First coined in 2024, “model collapse” refers to a scenario where an AI model trained on AI-produced data ceases to provide accurate results, instead producing inaccurate “gibberish” because of the poor quality of its training data.
Some have warned that high-quality text data to train systems like Large Language Models (LLMs) is set to run out as early as this year, and so data produced by models themselves has taken a larger training role—inviting the threat of model collapse.
Whether the dust borne on the violent winds of a tornado or the sugar grains in a swirled cup of coffee, the behavior of particles carried along in turbulence is subject to some similarities—all of them difficult to predict at scale. As described in a recent publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a research team led by Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists has developed a first-of-its-kind machine learning framework that models chaotic particle motions in a turbulent flow.
“Modeling turbulence is a big, open problem, and it’s probably the hardest problem in classical physics,” said Daniel Livescu, Los Alamos scientist and one of the leaders of the work. “A subset of that challenge is modeling particle motions within turbulence. To meet that challenge, our artificial intelligence approach offers an innovative theoretical construct tested with a real-world application.”
The team has developed and applied the first data-driven, auto-regressive machine learning framework to capture the dynamics of turbulence at scale. The research demonstrates that machine learning can overcome longstanding barriers in modeling chaotic particle motions.