Toggle light / dark theme

Mitochondrial dysfunction in cerebrovascular diseases

Opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, Ca2+ overload, and mitochondrial fragmentation are early features of stroke-induced brain injury observed in experimental models.

Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and activation of the cyclophilin D– reactive oxygen species–NLR family pyrin domain-containing 3–matrix metalloproteinase-9 axis are associated with intracranial aneurysm progression, linking mitochondrial stress to vascular wall instability.

Disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis exacerbates vascular pathology in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, arteriovenous malformations, and cavernous malformation, indicating a shared mitochondrial contribution across cerebrovascular disorders.

Pharmacological modulation of mitochondrial permeability, redox signaling, proprotein convertase subtilisin/ kexin type 9, and mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase pathways shows robust preclinical efficacy, while clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous.

Experimental studies support the feasibility of mitochondrial transplantation in models of cerebrovascular injury, including stroke. sciencenewshighlights ScienceMission https://sciencemission.com/Mito-dysfunction-in-CVD


Mitochondria are central regulators of cerebrovascular health through their control of energy metabolism, Ca2+ homeostasis, and redox signaling, and their dysfunction represents a convergent pathogenic mechanism across cerebrovascular diseases. In ischemic stroke, mitochondrial failure exacerbates neuronal injury via permeability transition pore opening, oxidative stress, and bioenergetic collapse, while altered mitochondrial dynamics and the release of mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns amplify neuroinflammation during reperfusion. Beyond stroke, mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to intracranial aneurysms, atherosclerotic stenosis, and vascular malformations, where oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA instability, and cell type-specific metabolic reprogramming drive vascular remodeling and lesion progression.

World Science Festival

Does quantum mechanics actually imply that every possible outcome of every decision happens somewhere in an expansive reality? And if so, what does that mean for probability, free will, and our understanding of the universe itself?

Brian Greene sits down with David Deutsch, widely regarded as the father of quantum computing, to examine what many physicists are still reluctant to accept about their own theory. They explore why the many-worlds interpretation isn’t just a philosophical curiosity, what the wave function is really telling us about reality, and how decision theory may rescue probability in a fully deterministic multiverse. Deutsch also introduces constructor theory, his framework for rethinking the foundations of physics entirely and explains why the questions we’ve been trained not to ask might be the most important ones in all of science.

This program is part of the Rethinking Reality series, supported by the John Templeton Foundation.

Participant: David Deutsch.
Moderator: Brian Greene.

#worldsciencefestival #briangreene #cosmology #astrophysics.

ABOUT WORLD SCIENCE FESTIVAL:

How individual consciousness works — and makes us unique

As we go through life, our brains run different processing modes. Some – the attention and sensory systems – result in very similar experiences of the world: what colour the sky is, how warm the day feels.

But there is another, deeper side to the brain which weaves together your memories, goals, beliefs and emotions into a continuous sense of self. This allows you to experience the world not as it is, but as it matters to you personally.

This unique inner world is supported by the brain’s default mode network (DMN). This links together several areas including in the prefrontal cortex (at the very front of the brain) and the parietal lobe (at the back).

You have no free will at all | Stanford professor Robert Sapolsky

Become a Big Think member to unlock expert classes, premium print issues, exclusive events and more: https://bigthink.com/membership/?utm_… How your biology and environment make your decisions for you, according to Dr. Robert Sapolsky.

Up next, Your reptilian brain, explained ► • Your reptilian brain, explained | Robert S…

Robert Sapolsky, PhD is an author, researcher, and professor of biology, neurology, and neurosurgery at Stanford University. In this interview with Big Think’s Editor-in-Chief, Robert Chapman Smith, Sapolsky discusses the content of his most recent book, “Determined: The Science of Life Without Free Will.”

Being held as a child, growing up in a collectivist culture, or experiencing any sort of brain trauma – among hundreds of other things – can shape your internal biases and ultimately influence the decisions you make. This, explains Sapolsky, means that free will is not – and never has been – real. Even physiological factors like hunger can discreetly influence decision making, as discovered in a study that found judges were more likely to grant parole after they had eaten.

This insight is key for interpreting human behavior, helping not only scientists but those who aim to evolve education systems, mental health research, and even policy making.

Go Deeper with Big Think:

Do We Have Free Will? with Robert Sapolsky & Neil deGrasse Tyson

Is there a quantum reason we could have free will? Neil deGrasse Tyson and comedian Chuck Nice explore the concept of free will and predetermination with neuroscientist, biologist, and author of Determined: The Science of Life Without Free Will, Robert Sapolsky.

A special thanks from our editors to Robert Sapolsky’s dog.

Could we put an end to the question of whether or not we have free will? Discover “The Hungry Judge Effect” and how little bits of biology affect our actions. We break down a physicist’s perspective of free will, The Big Bang, and chaos theory. Is it enough to just feel like we have free will? Why is it an issue to think you have free will if you don’t?

We discuss the difference between free will in big decisions versus everyday decisions. How do you turn out to be the type of person who chooses vanilla ice cream over strawberry? We explore how quantum physics and virtual particles factor into predetermination. Could quantum randomness change the actions of an atom? How can society best account for a lack of free will? Are people still responsible for their actions?

What would Chuck do if he could do anything he wanted? We also discuss the benefits of a society that acknowledges powers outside of our control and scientific advancements made. How is meritocracy impacted by free will? Plus, can you change if people believe in free will if they have no free will in believing so?

Thanks to our Patrons Pro Handyman, Brad K. Daniels, Starman, Stephen Somers, Nina Kane, Paul Applegate, and David Goldberg for supporting us this week.

/* */