Toggle light / dark theme

Reading brachycephalic dogs’ facial expressions requires extra cognitive processing by humans

People often look to dogs’ behavior, especially their facial expressions, for indications of their states of mind. Numerous studies show that this is a popular interpretation strategy. However, modern dog breeds vary greatly in size and structure, and few studies have explored how breed-specific morphology might affect humans’ ability to assess visual cues from the faces of different breeds of dogs.

Now, for the first time, a collaborative research team including scientists from Israel, Czechia, and Hungary has used eye-tracking to compare the visual attention patterns of humans observing photographs of normocephalic and brachycephalic dogs. A research paper detailing the team’s findings appears in Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

Hidden brain circuit could explain how movement errors sharpen new skills

While humans are acquiring new skills that entail performing coordinated movements, such as walking, playing an instrument or skateboarding, their brains are known to continuously detect mistakes and correct movements over time. This gradual acquisition of task-specific movements is known as motor learning.

Past neuroscience studies suggest that a brain region known as the cerebellum plays a central role in motor learning. The cerebellum is a structure at the back of the brain that contributes to coordination, balancing the timing of voluntary actions and the execution of precise movements.

This brain structure hosts a type of nerve cell known as Purkinje cells (PCs), which receive input information via climbing fibers (CFs), nerve fibers that originate from a lower region in the brainstem. Neuroscientists have hypothesized that climbing fibers also carry signals that instruct the brain to adapt to movements based on earlier mistakes.

Why ‘football’ beats ‘shamrock’ when your brain is dismantling every word at lightning speed

Before you even know what a word means, your brain is already playing a rapid-fire game of linguistic LEGO. Discover how our minds secretly dissect words, piece by orthographic piece, in the blink of an eye.

Imagine catching a flash of the word football on a screen. Before you even register its meaning (“a game” or “a ball”), your brain may have already parsed it into “foot” + “ball.” A clever new experiment used red-and-blue anaglyph glasses and split-second word flashes to probe this. It found that real compound words (like football) are recognized much faster than lookalikes (like shamrock), suggesting our eyes and brain latch onto word form almost instantly.

In the lab, volunteers wore 3D-style red/blue glasses while words appeared for just 60 milliseconds under a mask. Each word was painted half red and half blue, splitting it either at a meaningful break or in the middle of a syllable. For example, “FOOT” might be blue and “BALL” red, or vice versa, sending “foot” to one hemisphere and “ball” to the other. Participants then quickly reported if what they saw was a real word or a made-up one.

The nocebo effect: How prior experience and verbal suggestion rewire the brain to make pain worse

Researchers have a better understanding of the nocebo effect and the neuroscience behind it all. Opposite of the better-known placebo effect, where positive expectations trigger genuine pain relief, the nocebo effect is the experience from negative expectations, created by prior experience, verbal suggestion, or social observation, which can drive anxiety and make pain worse.

A new study published in Nature Communications, by researchers at the University of Toronto Mississauga and McGill University, identified a brain pathway through which negative expectations can amplify pain. The findings, generated independently by the two labs without prior coordination, converged on the neurochemical cholecystokinin (CCK), which has previously been linked to nocebo pain responses in humans.

The researchers identified a specific brain pathway through which CCK acts, traveling from the brain’s anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a region involved in the emotional dimensions of pain, to a midbrain structure called the lateral periaqueductal gray (lPAG), where it increases pain sensitivity.

BI 109 Mark Bickhard: Interactivism

Patreon support: / braininspired.

Free Video Series: Open Questions in AI and Neuroscience:
https://braininspired.co/open/

Show notes: https://braininspired.co/podcast/109/

Mark and I discuss a wide range of topics surrounding his Interactivism framework for explaining cognition. Interactivism stems from Mark’s account of representations and how what we represent in our minds is related to the external world — a challenge that has plagued the mind-body problem since the beginning. Basically, representations are anticipated interactions with the world, that can be true (if enacting one helps an organism maintain its thermodynamic relation with the world) or false (if it doesn’t). And representations are functional, in that they function to maintain far from equilibrium thermodynamics for the organism for self-maintenance. Over the years, Mark has filled out Interactivism, starting with a process metaphysics foundation and building from there to account for representations, how our brains might implement representations, and why AI is hindered by our modern \.

Consciousness Beyond the Brain & Self | Michael Levin Λ Anna Ciaunica

In this episode, developmental biologist Michael Levin and cognitive scientist Anna Ciaunica examine how cellular intelligence challenges our traditional understanding of consciousness. They explore how memory, embodiment, and our interactions with others fundamentally shape the self.

A huge thank you to Dina Rudick, a four-time Emmy award-winning documentary filmmaker / journalist, who expertly aided this production at the last minute. You can find more about her work at https://www.anthemmultimedia.com. Definitely check out her films.

I personally subscribe to The Economist. TOE listeners get 35% off the annual subscription. No other podcast has this! https://economist.com/TOE

Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com.

Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/SpotifyTOE

Philosophy Talks 26: Emergence in Process — Prof. Mark H. Bickhard

Date of the talk: 13th November 2024

Abstract:
Emergence can (potentially) integrate across otherwise dual metaphysics of basic substances or atoms on one hand and higher ‘level’ phenomena, including mental phenomena, on the other. But there are strong arguments against the possibility of emergence, such as from Jaegwon Kim. I will argue that such arguments against emergence assume a metaphysics of ‘atoms’ (particles); that that metaphysics is false; that an alternative is a metaphysics of process; and that process metaphysics makes the possibility of emergence coherent and ubiquitous.

/* */