2016 Guardian Award

Julian Assange Named 2016 Lifeboat Foundation Guardian Award Winner

The 2016 Lifeboat Foundation Guardian Award has been given to Julian Assange in recognition of his quest to create an open world where the truth is told. He has worked to expose government lies, abuses, corruption, and surveillance. He is the second whistleblower to receive the Guardian Award which the Lifeboat Foundation has been awarding since 2002.
Why does Lifeboat Foundation think that government abuses and lies should be uncovered? Because powerful technologies that will soon be available could lead to a 1984-type society that would not only be unpleasant but could give the government the power to do terrible things that become existential threats. Secret surveillance can easily become excessive surveillance. Lies could cover up deadly weapons programs whether they are biotech, nanotech, or AI-based.
We are moving past the point where the most deadly weapons are nuclear weapons. Weapons that can self-replicate are usually more deadly as the release of a weapon in one country could quickly affect the world. Today such weapons are bioweapons. Tomorrow such weapons will be nanoweapons or rogue AIs. A government full of lies and corruption is unlikely to protect us against such threats.
In the book review of Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet by our Harry J. Bentham, Harry wrote that Julian Assange was illuminating the political dangers of state “total surveillance” of the uploaded lives of the population of the entire industrialized world, which is a possible step towards a 1984-type society.
As a large and diverse organization, the Lifeboat Foundation has taken the middle ground in the surveillance debate believing that our balanced SecurityPreserver program that includes both surveillance and sousveillance is the best way to handle the threat of existential threats that will soon be in the hands of small groups of people. Our David Brin’s The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom? is a good description of what we hope to achieve.
Of course, many of our members are against surveillance and some probably think the government is not being invasive enough with its surveillance. But without knowledge of what the government is doing, it is impossible for its citizens to debate the best possible course of action.
Why is the surveillance debate important to the Lifeboat Foundation?
1) Surveillance could prevent serious dangers.
2004 Guardian Award winner Martin Rees said in his book Our Final Hour: A Scientist’s Warning: How Terror, Error, and Environmental Disaster Threaten Humankind’s Future In This Century — On Earth and Beyond: “Science is advancing faster than ever, and on a broader front… But there is a dark side: new science can have unintended consequences; it empowers individuals to perpetrate acts of megaterror; even innocent errors could be catastrophic. The ‘downside’ from twenty-first century technology could be graver and more intractable than the threat of nuclear devastation that we have faced for decades.”
He went on to say “If there were millions of independent fingers on the button of a Doomsday machine, then one person’s act of irrationality, or even one person’s error, could do us all in.”
2) No civilization seems to have survived these dangers.
In The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, 2005 Guardian Award Winner Ray Kurzweil devoted 25 pages to “On the Intelligent Destiny of the Cosmos: Why We Are Probably Alone in the Universe”. (Pages 342–367.)
3) While surveillance is quite extensive, it seems to be remarkably poor at stopping terrorism. The endless terrorist attacks around the world only seem to be increasing in frequency. Until we know the details of how governments do their surveillance, we will have no chance to fix this problem.
It is possible that since governments don’t trust their citizens to even know what surveillance is being used that this discourages citizens from feeling like they are a valued part of society. Such “unvalued” citizens may feel their input doesn’t matter and therefore are discouraged from reporting suspicious activities.
4) If all countries were transparent about what surveillance they engaged in, then we could compare the outcomes to the surveillance being done and then determine which balance of privacy works best.

Julian Assange is an Australian computer programmer, publisher, and journalist. He is editor-in-chief of the organization WikiLeaks, which he founded in 2006.
Even though Julian's activities have been controversial, he has won numbers honors and awards including:
  • 2008, Economist New Media Award
  • 2009, Amnesty International UK Media Awards
  • 2010, TIME Person of the Year, Reader's Choice
  • 2010, Sam Adams Award
  • 2011, Free Dacia Award
  • 2011, Sydney Peace Foundation Gold Medal
  • 2011, Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism
  • 2011, Walkley Award for Most Outstanding Contribution to Journalism
  • 2011, Voltaire Award for Free Speech
  • 2012, Big Brother Awards Hero of Privacy
  • 2013, Global Exchange Human Rights Award, Peopleďż˝s Choice
  • 2013, Yoko Ono Lennon Courage Award for the Arts
  • 2013, New York Festivals World's Best TV & Films Silver World Medal
  • 2014, Union of Journalists in Kazakhstan Top Prize
Despite being confined to the Embassy of Ecuador in London since August 2012 due to legal troubles in Sweden, he played a major role in the U.S. election in 2016 exposing many truths. The United Nations’ Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found, by a majority in early 2016, that he has been “arbitrarily detained” and that his detention should be brought to an end but he remains confined to the embassy.
Listen to Julian Assange interview and Full Event: Wikileaks/Assange Hold Press Conference 10/4/16.