Difference between revisions of "User:Fdmcgraw"

From InfoPreserver
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Homework 7: Question 4
+
'''The Facts of the Case:'''
  
−
The Facts of the Case: Many pople are screaming for tighter gun control, while others say gun control has been taken too far already.  
+
Many states have contradicting laws, such as in Arkansas laws, it is legal under certain circumstances for a man to beat his wife, bu domestic abuse is a crime.  
  
−
My Conclusions: Guns are a basic right to protect ourselves, without the government interefering. 
+
'''My Conclusions:'''
  
−
Future Enviroment: Guns are not handed out, but gun safety is promoted and gun violence is highly penalized
+
These laws should be eradicated, and make Arkansas legal codes more concise. 
  
−
Future scenario: People are free to protect themselves, and crime is down due to the fact that is is not tolerated in the sense it is now.
+
'''Future Environment:'''
 +
 
 +
Laws are reviewed to eradicate inconsistencies and contradictions.
 +
 
 +
'''Future scenario:'''
 +
 
 +
Laws such as legal abuse are removed and the code is made more clear and concise.

Latest revision as of 15:08, 23 April 2013

The Facts of the Case:

Many states have contradicting laws, such as in Arkansas laws, it is legal under certain circumstances for a man to beat his wife, bu domestic abuse is a crime.

My Conclusions:

These laws should be eradicated, and make Arkansas legal codes more concise.

Future Environment:

Laws are reviewed to eradicate inconsistencies and contradictions.

Future scenario:

Laws such as legal abuse are removed and the code is made more clear and concise.

Retrieved from "https://lifeboat.com/InfoPreserver/index.php?title=User:Fdmcgraw&oldid=576"