Difference between revisions of "User:Shang"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jamatthews (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The facts of this case: | + | '''The facts of this case:''' |
| − | The facts of this failure are that : 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster. | + | The facts of this failure are that : |
| − | + | 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster. | |
| − | + | 2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed | |
| + | 3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA . | ||
| − | My conclusions : | + | '''My conclusions:''' |
| − | + | They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided. | |
| − | Future scenario:If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued . | + | '''Future environment:''' |
| + | |||
| + | In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Future scenario:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued . | ||
Latest revision as of 13:39, 23 April 2013
The facts of this case:
The facts of this failure are that : 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster. 2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed 3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .
My conclusions:
They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.
Future environment:
In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.
Future scenario:
If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .