Difference between revisions of "User:Shang"

From InfoPreserver
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The facts of this case: The facts of this failure are that : 1, the faulty design of solid rockets booster. 2, insufficient low-temperature t...")
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The facts of this case:
+
'''The facts of this case:'''
The facts of this failure are that : 1, the faulty design of solid rockets booster.
+
 
                                    2, insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed
+
The facts of this failure are that :
                                    3, lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .
+
1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster.
My conclusions :They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.
+
2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed
Future environment: In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.
+
3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .
Future scenario:If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .
+
 
 +
'''My conclusions:'''
 +
 
 +
They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.
 +
 
 +
'''Future environment:'''
 +
 
 +
In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.
 +
 
 +
'''Future scenario:'''
 +
 
 +
If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .

Latest revision as of 14:39, 23 April 2013

The facts of this case:

The facts of this failure are that : 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster. 2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed 3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .

My conclusions:

They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.

Future environment:

In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.

Future scenario:

If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .