Difference between revisions of "User:Shang"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The facts of this case: | + | '''The facts of this case:''' |
| + | The facts of this failure are that : | ||
| + | 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster. | ||
| + | 2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed | ||
| + | 3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA . | ||
| − | + | '''My conclusions:''' | |
| − | + | They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | '''Future environment:''' | |
| + | In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen. | ||
| − | Future | + | '''Future scenario:''' |
| − | + | If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued . | |
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:16, 16 April 2013
The facts of this case: The facts of this failure are that : 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster. 2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed 3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .
My conclusions: They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.
Future environment: In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.
Future scenario: If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .