{"id":9170,"date":"2013-12-02T12:27:24","date_gmt":"2013-12-02T20:27:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/?p=9170"},"modified":"2017-04-29T15:46:07","modified_gmt":"2017-04-29T22:46:07","slug":"googles-anti-facial-recognition-policy-for-glass-is-deadly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2013\/12\/googles-anti-facial-recognition-policy-for-glass-is-deadly","title":{"rendered":"Google\u2019s Anti-Facial Recognition Policy for Glass is Deadly"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

I believe Google is making a huge mistake in completely banning facial recognition systems for its Glass product. In my opinion, such a system could be used to help save thousands of lives. But then, we\u2019re too damn caught up on absolute privacy that we\u2019re willing to sacrifice actual, physical lives to ensure our privacy remains untainted. Such individualist dogma is deadly.<\/p>\n

According to the Amber Alert webpage<\/a>, \u201cA child goes missing in the United States every 40 seconds,\u201d and that \u201cMore than 700,000 children go missing annually.\u201d That is an absolutely frightening statistic! Much more frightening than the prospect that some Glass user may know my name.<\/p>\n

How far are we willing to go to ensure absolute privacy isn\u2019t diminished whatsoever? When does the right of privacy begin interfering with the right of safety? Can the two come together in harmony, or are they destined to be in conflict until society finally reaches a decision over one or the other?<\/p>\n

I understand the desire for privacy, but as I\u2019ve argued<\/a> in the past<\/a>, as we as a society become more public and technologically open-source, the idea of privacy slowly fades away. That isn\u2019t to say that some forms of privacy can\u2019t be maintained. Surely we should have the right to say \u2018yes\u2019 or \u2018no\u2019 over whether or not our private data is to be shared publicly. That level of freedom and choice could easily maintain a sense of privacy to each individual.<\/p>\n

But then, when it comes to missing children, or even missing adults, should we not then be willing to sacrifice a portion of our privacy to ensure the safety of those who\u2019s gone missing? It doesn\u2019t even have to be that large of a peek into each\u2019s private lives \u2014 simply a facial recog. map, a name, and whether or not they\u2019re reported missing, or even possibly wanted.<\/p>\n

Picture this with me: It\u2019s 2014 and only a few months have passed since the commercial launch of Google Glass. Hundreds of thousands of people already acquire their own device, scattered across the United States. A mandatory app was included with Glass, which was connected with Amber Alert systems. The app has Glass quietly scanning each face you cross paths with, but doesn\u2019t reveal their names, nor does it alert you that it\u2019s currently scanning. For all you know, it\u2019s a normal day like any other.<\/p>\n

Now, as you\u2019re walking down a street, you walk past an adult male with a pre-teen female. You don\u2019t even pay much attention to them. Just another group of people walking by, as far as you\u2019re concerned. But then Glass, on the other hand, knows something you don\u2019t \u2014 the little girl has been reported missing. As a result, without alerting you, the app then \u2014 albeit quietly \u2014 takes a snapshot of the girl and unknown male captor, contacts a 911 operator program, and delivers GPS coordinates of where the photo was taken and in which direction the girl was walking. The police show up, arrest the male captor, and contacts the parents of the missing child informing them that she\u2019d been found and safe.<\/p>\n

This was able to occur because each parent \u2014 or family member, guardian, etc. \u2014 had allowed the missing child\u2019s name and facial recog. map to be archived in a Amber Alert system program, which connects via app on Glass. Was said child\u2019s \u201cprivacy\u201d diminished? Yes. But then she\u2019s also alive because of it and a kidnapper is taken off the streets, not able to harm anyone else again.<\/p>\n

Isn\u2019t this very real prospect of technologically-enhanced safety worth sacrificing a bit of our own privacy? While I\u2019m not a parent, if anyone of my family were to go missing, their privacy would be the last thing I\u2019d be concerned about. And if I\u2019d<\/em> gone missing, I\u2019d want everyone to do all they could to find me, even if it meant sacrificing my own privacy.<\/p>\n

Google Glass is coming just next year. And with Google\u2019s determination to ban facial recognition using Glass, we must ask ourselves: At what price?<\/p>\n

The article above was originally published as a blog post on The Proactionary Transhumanist<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I believe Google is making a huge mistake in completely banning facial recognition systems for its Glass product. In my opinion, such a system could be used to help save thousands of lives. But then, we\u2019re too damn caught up on absolute privacy that we\u2019re willing to sacrifice actual, physical lives to ensure our privacy [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":288,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,41,31,1412],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ethics","category-information-science","category-policy","category-privacy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/288"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9170"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9170\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57037,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9170\/revisions\/57037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}