Science is based on dialog. Not a single colleague including Hawking and his crew contradicts my safety-relevant finding for 5 years. This fact can only have one of two reasons:
(1) The finding is so embarrassingly stupid that to take it up would suffice to soil the respondent.
(2) The finding harks back so deeply to the young Einstein that it causes fear to tread upon.<\/p>\n
One country \u2013 my own \u2013 singlehandedly left CERN in response (only to surreptitiously return under non-publicized pressure).<\/p>\n
Obviously the offered result (\u201cgothic-R theorem\u201d) has historical dimensions. Everyone\u2019s survival is affected by it probability-wise if it is valid. We \u201clive in an interesting time\u201d as the Chinese proverb goes.<\/p>\n
800 newspapers reported on the theorem in 2008. Only Aljazeera remained four years later. There is a \u201ccurfew of silence\u201d obeyed by my colleagues. Not a single counterargument is in the literature against my result published in 2008 and its many sequels.<\/p>\n
Why is CERN\u2019s official \u201cSafety Report\u201d allowed to go un-updated for 5 years? And why is the friendly admonition by a court given to CERN standing before it to, please, admit a \u201csafety conference\u201d a planet-wide taboo topic even after almost three years? Refusing dialog and discussion is one thing, refusing updating on safety is another. In the one case but a single person is the victim, in the other it is you and you and you.<\/p>\n