{"id":8229,"date":"2013-06-08T01:12:18","date_gmt":"2013-06-08T08:12:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/?p=8229"},"modified":"2013-06-08T15:06:42","modified_gmt":"2013-06-08T22:06:42","slug":"update-on-the-lhc-danger-after-half-a-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2013\/06\/update-on-the-lhc-danger-after-half-a-year","title":{"rendered":"Update on the LHC-Danger \u2013 after Half a Year"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>1) CERN officially attempted to produce ultraslow miniature black holes on earth. It has announced to continue doing so after the current more than a year-long break for upgrading. <\/p>\n<p>2) Miniature black holes possess radically new properties according to published scientific results that go unchallenged in the literature for 5 years: no Hawking evaporation; unchargedness; invisibility to CERN\u2019s detectors; enhanced chance of being produced. <\/p>\n<p>3) Of the millions of miniature black holes hoped to have been produced, at least one is bound to be slow enough to stay inside earth to circulate there.<\/p>\n<p>4) This miniature black hole circulates undisturbed \u2013 until it captures the first charged quark. From then on it grows exponentially doubling in size in months at first, later in weeks.<\/p>\n<p>5) As a consequence, after about 100 doublings, earth will start showing manifest signs of \u201ccancer.\u201d And she will \u2013 after first losing her atmosphere \u2013 die within months to leave nothing but a 2-cm black hole in her wake that still keeps the moon on its course.<\/p>\n<p>6) CERN\u2019s roundabout-way safety argument of 2008, invoking the observed longevity of neutron stars as a guarantee for earth, got falsified on the basis of quantum mechanics in a paper published in mid-2008. <\/p>\n<p>7) CERN\u2019s second roundabout-way safety argument of 2008, invoking the observed longevity of white dwarf stars as a guarantee for earth, likewise got falsified in scientific papers the first of which was published in mid-2008. CERN overlooked the enlarged-cross section principle valid for ultra-slow artificial, compared to ultrafast natural, miniature black holes. The same effect is frighteningly familiar from the slow \u201ccold\u201d neutrons in nuclear fission. <\/p>\n<p>In summary, seven coincidences of \u201cbad luck\u201d were found to cooperate like Macbeth\u2019s fateful 3 witches. CERN decided to accept the blemish of not up-dating its safety report for 5 years so far. Also it steadfastly refuses the safety conference publicly requested on the web on April 18, 2008 (\u201cHoney, I shrunk the earth\u201d). Most significantly, CERN up to this day refuses to heed a Cologne Court\u2019s advice, handed-out to CERN\u2019s representatives standing before it on January the 27th of 2011, to hold a \u201csafety conference.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Unless there is a safety guarantee that CERN keeps a secret from the whole world while mentioning it only behind closed doors to bring the World Press Council and the UN Security Council to refrain from doing their otherwise inalienable duty, the above-sketched scenario has no parallel in history.<\/p>\n<p>Not a single scientific publication world-wide claims to falsify one of the above-sketched results (points 2\u20137). Only a very charismatic scientist may be able to call back the media and the mighty behind closed doors. I have a hunch who this could be. But I challenge him to no longer hide so the world can see to whom she owes her hopefully beneficial fate. <\/p>\n<p>Has there ever been a more unsettling story kept from the citizens of this planet?<\/p>\n<p>For J.O.R.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1) CERN officially attempted to produce ultraslow miniature black holes on earth. It has announced to continue doing so after the current more than a year-long break for upgrading. 2) Miniature black holes possess radically new properties according to published scientific results that go unchallenged in the literature for 5 years: no Hawking evaporation; unchargedness; [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":145,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-existential-risks","category-particle-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/145"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8229"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8229\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}