{"id":78047,"date":"2018-04-26T07:02:23","date_gmt":"2018-04-26T14:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2018\/04\/balancing-nuclear-and-renewable-energy"},"modified":"2018-04-26T07:02:23","modified_gmt":"2018-04-26T14:02:23","slug":"balancing-nuclear-and-renewable-energy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2018\/04\/balancing-nuclear-and-renewable-energy","title":{"rendered":"Balancing nuclear and renewable energy"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

Nuclear power plants typically run either at full capacity or not at all. Yet the plants have the technical ability to adjust to the changing demand for power and thus better accommodate sources of renewable energy such as wind or solar power.<\/p>\n

Researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology recently explored the benefits of doing just that. If nuclear plants<\/a> generated power<\/a> in a more flexible manner, the researchers say, the plants could lower electricity costs for consumers, enable the use of more renewable energy<\/a>, improve the economics of nuclear energy<\/a> and help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.<\/p>\n

The team explored technical constraints on flexible operations at nuclear power plants<\/a> and introduced a new way to model how those challenges affect how power systems operate. \u201cFlexible nuclear power operations are a \u2018win-win-win,\u2019 lowering power system operating costs, increasing revenues for nuclear plant owners and significantly reducing curtailment of renewable energy,\u201d wrote the team in an Applied Energy<\/i> article published online on April 24.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nuclear power plants typically run either at full capacity or not at all. Yet the plants have the technical ability to adjust to the changing demand for power and thus better accommodate sources of renewable energy such as wind or solar power. Researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory and the [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":467,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,873,1633,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-nuclear-energy","category-solar-power","category-sustainability"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/467"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78047\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}