{"id":75302,"date":"2018-01-16T02:22:51","date_gmt":"2018-01-16T10:22:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2018\/01\/alibabas-ai-outguns-humans-in-reading-test"},"modified":"2018-01-16T17:00:30","modified_gmt":"2018-01-17T01:00:30","slug":"alibabas-ai-outguns-humans-in-reading-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2018\/01\/alibabas-ai-outguns-humans-in-reading-test","title":{"rendered":"Alibaba\u2019s AI Outguns Humans in Reading Test"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"aligncenter blog-photo\" href=\"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog.images\/alibabas-ai-outguns-humans-in-reading-test2.jpg\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Alibaba said it\u2019s the first time a machine has out-done a real person in such a contest. Microsoft achieved a similar feat, scoring 82.650 on the same test, but those results were finalized a day after Alibaba\u2019s, the company said.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Alibaba has developed an artificial intelligence model that scored better than humans in a Stanford University reading and comprehension test.<\/p>\n<p>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. put its deep neural network model through its paces last week, asking the AI to provide exact answers to more than 100,000 questions comprising a quiz that\u2019s considered one of the world\u2019s most authoritative machine-reading gauges. The model developed by Alibaba\u2019s Institute of Data Science of Technologies scored 82.44, edging past the 82.304 that rival humans achieved.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2018-01-15\/alibaba-s-ai-outgunned-humans-in-key-stanford-reading-test\">https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2018&#45;01&#45;15\/a...ading-test<\/a> --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alibaba said it\u2019s the first time a machine has out-done a real person in such a contest. Microsoft achieved a similar feat, scoring 82.650 on the same test, but those results were finalized a day after Alibaba\u2019s, the company said. Alibaba has developed an artificial intelligence model that scored better than humans in a Stanford [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":417,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-robotics-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/417"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75302"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75322,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75302\/revisions\/75322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}