{"id":64,"date":"2007-03-20T19:22:56","date_gmt":"2007-03-21T02:22:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/?p=64"},"modified":"2017-04-25T04:52:07","modified_gmt":"2017-04-25T11:52:07","slug":"us-envisions-a-new-generation-of-nuclear-weapons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2007\/03\/us-envisions-a-new-generation-of-nuclear-weapons","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Envisions A New Generation Of Nuclear Weapons"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Science Daily \u2014 Almost 62 years after detonation of the first atomic<br \/> bombs, the United States is considering controversial proposals to<br \/> produce a new generation of nuclear weapons and revamp its nuclear<br \/> weapons complex, according to an article scheduled for the March 19<br \/> issue of Chemical &amp; Engineering News (C&amp;EN), ACS\u2019 weekly newsmagazine.<\/p>\n<p>In the article, C&amp;EN senior editor Jeff Johnson points out that the<br \/> proposals come at a time of growing fears about potential new nuclear<br \/> powers, such as North Korea and Iran, and potential diversion of<br \/> nuclear weapons into the hands of terrorists. The U.S. Department of<br \/> Energy\u2019s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which<br \/> oversees design, production and maintenance of nuclear weapons,<br \/> developed the proposals.<\/p>\n<p>One part of the plan, for instance, calls for production of the<br \/> \u201crenewable, replacement warhead (RRW),\u201d a new nuclear weapon that NNSA<br \/> says will be easier and environmentally cleaner to manufacture and<br \/> more difficult for potential terrorists to disassemble or detonate.<\/p>\n<p>The article describes details of the RRW, envisioned for production by<br \/> 2012, and discusses differing opinions about the new proposals for the<br \/> U.S. nuclear arsenal, now believed to number about 10,000 warheads.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Science Daily \u2014 Almost 62 years after detonation of the first atomic bombs, the United States is considering controversial proposals to produce a new generation of nuclear weapons and revamp its nuclear weapons complex, according to an article scheduled for the March 19 issue of Chemical &amp; Engineering News (C&amp;EN), ACS\u2019 weekly newsmagazine. In the [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nuclear-weapons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52306,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64\/revisions\/52306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}