{"id":5383,"date":"2012-09-27T06:10:42","date_gmt":"2012-09-27T13:10:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/?p=5383"},"modified":"2012-09-28T00:50:11","modified_gmt":"2012-09-28T07:50:11","slug":"t-o-e-the-ontological-einstein","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2012\/09\/t-o-e-the-ontological-einstein","title":{"rendered":"T.O.E. \u2013 The Ontological Einstein"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The Ontological Einstein: \u201cVertical Twin-clocks Paradox Implies reversible Change of Size, Rest-mass and Charge\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>by Professor Otto E. Rossler, Chaos Researcher, University of Tubingen, Germany<\/p>\n<p><strong>Minipaper<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The ordinary (horizontal) twin-clocks paradox described by Einstein in 1905 objectively transports a younger twin into the future as is well known. This is a tangible miracle.<\/p>\n<p>Poincar\u00e9, who had been almost everywhere before Einstein in special relativity (except for the transversal Doppler effect), had not seen this most astounding implication of the observer-specific absolute constancy of the speed of light, c. I call it an \u201contological\u201d effect. As such it stands not alone. It possesses a much less well-known sibling of equal rank and even stronger power as it turns out, the \u201cvertical twin clocks paradox.\u201d It applies in gravity when the sibling is reversibly lowered to stay for a while in a redshifted region down there. The second twin paradox\u2019s long history has yet to be written; it not only makes the twin younger: It also implies a transitory change in size, mass and charge of the lowered twin and \u2014 via the first of these three effects \u2014 amazingly re-establishes global constancy of the speed of light c in general relativity (Telemach theorem).<\/p>\n<p>No colleague objects but the crowd (exempting my friends) fumes behind closed doors. There is much money involved. CERN \u2013 despite the black-hole danger revealed to the eye by Telemach \u2013 refuses to update its 4 years old \u201csafety report\u201d and openly ignores a court\u2019s kind request to admit a \u201csafety conference.\u201d The world\u2019s media strangely comply by the suitors (to stay in the picture of Einstein-Ulysses) while the prospect of the planet being shrunk to 2 cm in a few years\u2019 time with a non-small probability is being tacitly embraced globally. Ithaka is at risk.<\/p>\n<p>There never was a bigger scandal, so it appears to me. Love is the unique invention of humankind \u2013 ultraperspective: to see with the eyes of the other and let this be known to her or him. I dare officially ask Israel again (and Iran for the first time) to bring the matter up in public. The fact that the Security Council objects out of solidarity with its sister organization (CERN) is not acceptable. Every citizen of the planet hopes that the threshold toward a first mini-black hole having been implanted into our planet to grow there exponentially, has not yet been overstepped by CERN\u2019s ongoing attempt to produce black holes even though its sensors cannot even detect them owing to T.O.E.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLampsacus Hometown of Humankind on the Internet\u201d deserves to be implemented at long last by Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran and CERN in an attempt at recompense, combined with world-wide prayers, for \u201cthis is what humankind was meant for\u201d as I learned 15 years ago in Israel. Bless you all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Ontological Einstein: \u201cVertical Twin-clocks Paradox Implies reversible Change of Size, Rest-mass and Charge\u201d by Professor Otto E. Rossler, Chaos Researcher, University of Tubingen, Germany Minipaper The ordinary (horizontal) twin-clocks paradox described by Einstein in 1905 objectively transports a younger twin into the future as is well known. This is a tangible miracle. Poincar\u00e9, who [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":145,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-existential-risks","category-particle-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/145"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5383\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}