{"id":373,"date":"2009-04-05T15:56:11","date_gmt":"2009-04-05T22:56:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/?p=373"},"modified":"2017-06-04T12:14:25","modified_gmt":"2017-06-04T19:14:25","slug":"on-being-bitten-to-death-by-ducks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2009\/04\/on-being-bitten-to-death-by-ducks","title":{"rendered":"On Being Bitten to Death by Ducks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\/blog\/?p=196\">Crossposted<\/a> on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\/blog\/\">blog<\/a> of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\">Starship Reckless<\/a>)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Working feverishly on the bench, I\u2019ve had little time to closely track the ongoing spat between Dawkins and Nisbet. Others have dissected this conflict and its ramifications in great detail. What I want to discuss is whether scientists can or should represent their fields to non-scientists.<\/p>\n<p>There is more than a dollop of truth in the Hollywood clich\u00e9 of the tongue-tied scientist. Nevertheless, scientists can explain at least their own domain of expertise just fine, even become major popular voices (Sagan, Hawkin, Gould \u2014 and, yes, Dawkins; all white Anglo men, granted, but at least it means they have fewer gatekeepers questioning their legitimacy). Most scientists don\u2019t speak up because they\u2019re clocking infernally long hours doing first-hand science and\/or training successors, rather than trying to become middle(wo)men for their disciplines.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Experimental biologists, in particular, are faced with unique challenges: not only are they hobbled by ever-decreasing funds for basic research while expected to still deliver like before. They are also beset by anti-evolutionists, the last niche that science deniers can occupy without being classed with geocentrists, flat-earthers and exorcists. Additionally, they are faced with the complexity (both intrinsic and social) of the phenomenon they\u2019re trying to understand, whose subtleties preclude catchy soundbites and get-famous-quick schemes.<\/p>\n<p>Last but not least, biologists have to contend with self-anointed experts, from physicists to science fiction writers to software engineers to MBAs, who believe they know more about the field than its practitioners. As a result, they have largely left the public face of their science to others, in part because its benefits \u2014 the quadrupling of the human lifespan from antibiotics and vaccines, to give just one example \u2014 are so obvious as to make advertisement seem embarrassing overkill.<\/p>\n<p>As a working biologist, who must constantly \u201cprove\u201d the value of my work to credentialed peers as well as laypeople in order to keep doing basic research on dementia, I\u2019m sick of accommodationists and appeasers. Gould, despite his erudition and eloquence, did a huge amount of damage when he proposed his non-overlapping magisteria. I\u2019m tired of self-anointed flatulists \u2014 pardon me, futurists \u2014 who waft forth on biological topics they know little about, claiming that smatterings gleaned largely from the Internet make them understand the big picture (much sexier than those plodding, narrow-minded, boring experts!). I\u2019m sick and tired of being told that I should leave the defense and promulgation of scientific values to \u201ccommunications experts\u201d who use the platform for their own aggrandizement.<\/p>\n<p>Nor are non-scientists served well by condescending pseudo-interpretations that treat them like ignorant, stupid children. People need to view the issues in all their complexity, because complex problems require nuanced solutions, long-term effort and incorporation of new knowlege. Considering that the outcomes of such discussions have concrete repercussions on the long-term viability prospects of our species and our planet, I staunchly believe that accommodationism and silence on the part of scientists is little short of immoral.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike astronomy and physics, biology has been reluctant to present simplified versions of itself. Although ours is a relatively young science whose predictions are less derived from general principles, our direct and indirect impact exceeds that of all others. Therefore, we must have articulate spokespeople, rather than delegate discussion of our work to journalists or politicians, even if they\u2019re well-intentioned and well-informed.<\/p>\n<p><em>Image: Prometheus, black-figure Spartan vase ~500 BCE.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Crossposted on the blog of Starship Reckless) Working feverishly on the bench, I\u2019ve had little time to closely track the ongoing spat between Dawkins and Nisbet. Others have dissected this conflict and its ramifications in great detail. What I want to discuss is whether scientists can or should represent their fields to non-scientists. There is [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,40,32,30,20,31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-biological","category-complex-systems","category-education","category-ethics","category-futurism","category-policy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=373"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65150,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373\/revisions\/65150"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}