{"id":3691,"date":"2012-04-23T08:50:46","date_gmt":"2012-04-23T15:50:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/?p=3691"},"modified":"2012-05-15T14:31:01","modified_gmt":"2012-05-15T21:31:01","slug":"a-muse-on-why-telemach-would-actually-be-a-safety-assurance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2012\/04\/a-muse-on-why-telemach-would-actually-be-a-safety-assurance","title":{"rendered":"A muse on why Telemach could actually be a Safety Assurance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The avid reader of Lifeboat may have noticed that the debate on LHC safety assurances has recently swerved here towards discussion on astronomical phenomenology \u2014 mainly the continued existence of white dwarfs and neutron stars.<\/p>\n<p>The detailed G&amp;M safety report naturally considers both of these, and considers hypothetical stable MBH capture rates based on a weak CR background flux. It actually overlooks better examples of white dwarfs which are part of a binary pair such as Sirius B, the little companion to one of our closest and brightest stars, Sirius A.<\/p>\n<p>One could argue that white dwarfs are not greatly understood \u2014 but the relevant factors to the safety debate are quite understood \u2014 density, mass, escape velocity, and approximate age of such observed phenomenon. Only magnetic field effects are up for debate.<\/p>\n<p>If Sirius B captured even one such MBH due to CR bombardment from its companion star in the first say 20 million years of its existence \u2014 and it would be difficult to argue that it would not \u2014 then that MBH would be accreting for the last 100 million years, through far denser material, and most likely at a much higher velocity, than any MBH captured in the Earth due to LHC collisions. Therefore, given the continued existence of Sirius B, accretion rates would therefore have to be incredibly slow and there would be no significant threat to Earth from what would be a much slower MBH accretion rate here.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, any argument promoting the oft rubbished T-L-M-Ch theorem actually provides us with a safe assurance, in the knowledge that accretion rates must be negligible, that there is also no risk of any heating\/micro-explosive effect due to Hawking Radiation, as Telemach refutes HR. In this context it is quite a paradox that Prof O.E. Rossler who derived Telemach has championed it as a safety concern\u2026<\/p>\n<p>In the volatile world we live in today it is unfortunate that other issues are over-dominated by the debate on the safety of one particular industry here that may be no threat whatsoever. It was with pleasure I read The Chaos Point \u2014 The World at the Crossroads by Ervin Laszlo recently. As far as I recall, our particle colliders hardly got a mention at all.<\/p>\n<p>And finally to share a very low-key \u2018Earth Day\u2019 gig in my local town last weekend I was happy to attend \u2018(a) choose or create a pledge (b) once committed you must try and stick to your pledge to the end and \u00a9 try to start an eco revolution\u2019: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=0m1VMbu6PYU\">It\u2019s a wonderful world.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The avid reader of Lifeboat may have noticed that the debate on LHC safety assurances has recently swerved here towards discussion on astronomical phenomenology \u2014 mainly the continued existence of white dwarfs and neutron stars. The detailed G&amp;M safety report naturally considers both of these, and considers hypothetical stable MBH capture rates based on a [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":196,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-existential-risks","category-particle-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/196"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3691"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3691\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}