I am a \u201cspecialist in non-specialization\u201d, in the words of my late Austrian mentor Konrad Lorenz, and an \u201cinterdisciplinary hybrid\u201d in those of my late American mentor Bob Rosen. IMy work in chaos theory is a little bit well known, in that I discovered a so-called \u201cattractor\u201d or \u201creproducible dynamic phenomenon\u201d familiar in everyday experience (a hoarse voice and an idling motorcycle\u2019s noise being examples). My subsequent discovery of \u201chyperchaos\u201d was soon used as a diagnostic tool in wards for the newborn whose cries turn from chaos to hyperchaos in case of a crisis, as H. Herzel found out. My \u201cbrain equation\u201d is also getting some recognition lately. My \u201csmile theory\u201d is my oldest but hardest to understand theory (though children typically have no difficulty with it!). <\/p>\n
My recent \u201cTelemach theorem\u201d \u2013 named after Ulysses\u2019 son Telemachus \u2013 is a much more frightening conceptual structure, however. It suggests that continuing escalation of the energy of operation of the Large Hadron Collider outside Geneva, Switzerland, indeed has the potential of forming dangerous mini Black Holes which could consume the Earth.<\/p>\n
A proven implication of known physical laws \u2013 a theorem \u2013 is true until a counterargument is found that topples it. The name Telemach has to do with the youth of an ancient Greek myth who recognized a beggar as the long lost father he had believed was dead. In my title the acronym stands for Time, Length, Mass and Charge (T, L, M, Ch), four entities that can be measured in everyday life by means of simple devices \u2014 clocks, meter sticks, scales and volt meters. <\/p>\n
You probably already know that there exists no \u201cUr-Second\u201d in physics (because of Einstein\u2019s work); but an \u201cUr-Meter\u201d and an \u201cUr-Kilogram\u201d and a \u201cUniversal Unit Charge\u201d are believed to exist and are well known. The Ur-meter and the Ur-kilogram were actually quite costly and difficult to arrive at. The struggle took scientists and engineers many decades in furthering the science of measurement (Metrology) in this regard. <\/p>\n
Therefore it is of some interest that my Telemach theorem in summary says that three \u201cUrs\u201d do not, after all, exist. The Ur-meter, the Ur-kilogram, the Ur-charge are all three as non-existent as the Ur-Second, dethroned 105 years ago by Albert Einstein, and the \u201cUr-Pound,\u201d dethroned almost 350 years ago and proven to be nonexistent by Isaac Newton.
You might expect an excited reaction to the new elimination of three \u201cUrs\u201d, but my work has been met with silence. In one way this might seem surprising, since popular opinion holds that new findings are automatically embraced, since new equipment can be built and new money can be made. But there are always the old manufacturers, as it were. Something radically unexpected is never accepted without delay.<\/p>\n
No doubt you are skeptical here: \u201cThree major new things and no response\u201d is implausible. Surely such a major offering of revisionist \u201cnew science\u201d must be crazy? No one has shown so up until now \u2014 yet I hope this \u201ccounter-reaction\u201d will come soon. For the present confession is not meant as a bid for scientific recognition with three grand new theorems L, M, Ch as you might expect. On the contrary, I do not like these results: I wish them to be proven wrong. <\/p>\n
The key word is \u201cLHC\u201d, the Large Hadron Collider, on line now: the biggest machine in history, comparable to the pyramids, the largest concerted endeavor of humanity of the past. The LHC cost about ten billion dollars and like the interior of the pyramids is well protected, and is located hundreds of feet underground, underneath CERN and adjacent to UNO. Almost no one is afraid of it except me. <\/p>\n
Of course I am not the only critic of the LHC, but while the others speak of \u201cpossibilities\u201d I speak of \u201cproven probabilities\u201d which is a different matter. Specifically, I have been saying for 4 years: \u201cYou have to stop immediately until your safety has been assessed in a scientific safety conference.\u201d And for a whole year now, a German court has suggested the same thing \u2014 but no one in the public is informed of this, except the profession of medical laboratory assistants, a member of which filed the suit in question. <\/p>\n
This silence has to do with the logic of the media that I find so difficult to understand. I here follow the advice of a member of the media by stating my case in front of you in the simplest and most understandable way: Why should such a beautiful experiment, the most expensive in history, be delayed even briefly for a conference about \u201cmini black holes\u201d to take place? You guess right: because of my Telemach. Like Diogenes basking in the sun in his town in Ancient Greece and asking Alexander the Great to move out of the way to let the sunshine reach him, this is bound to be thought crazy.<\/p>\n
At this point my speech in defense of the planet begins with Telemach in the witness stand. L-M-Ch are the crucial new letters added to Einstein\u2019s T. T means that the Time registered downstairs in a long vertical rocketship, that is in constant acceleration in outer space, is slowed-down compared to the tip. Here I skip the proportionally enlarged L (for Length) and the proportionally reduced M (for Mass) and concentrate on the proportionally reduced Ch, which stands for Charge. My third new claim is that charge is not conserved in nature, just as the unit of time is not fixed. <\/p>\n
This of course must seem absolutely ridiculous: Or so almost every physicist must feel, after almost two centuries in which science has taught that the opposite holds true. And if this tail of Telemach, the claim that Ch is not constant, is false, will the Large Hadron Collider experiment (LHC) at Geneva then be predictably safe from my point of view? The answer is Yes.<\/p>\n
Are well-known textbooks not a stronger guarantee of truth than a single man\u2019s proof \u2014 even if the latter is as youthful and old as Telemachus? I admit that this rule ordinarily holds true but, on the other hand, young David, sculptured by Michelangelo, still proudly exhibits his nakedness \u2013 and so at this moment does young Telemach.<\/p>\n
What he stands up against is a most \u201cnoble\u201d mathematical result accepted for almost two centuries. This says in its current physical application that if you have managed to put a given charge (think of an electron) into a bounded surface (a closed sack of any shape), then there is no way to diminish the sack\u2019s attractive power on another sack containing the opposite charge (a positron, say) no matter how you might internally displace the charge in your sack: \u201cThe number of field lines leaving the sack is always constant.\u201d <\/p>\n
Two famous 19th century mathematicians, Gauss and Stokes, demonstrated this and their proof holds up to this day in the opinion of the highest-ranking specialists in the field, as I was told by one of them who quoted Robert M. Wald\u2019s masterly book \u201cGeneral Relativity\u201d of 1984 (see pages 432 \u2013 434). Gauss\u2019 and Stokes\u2019 result remains authoritative \u2013 but no one can blame them for not yet knowing about black holes.<\/p>\n
Black holes thus are the magic word. The name is the brainchild of my late friend John Wheeler (and at the same time that of an ancient farm near my University of T\u00fcbingen called \u201cSchw\u00e4rzloch\u201d). The issue is about \u201cmy black holes\u201d versus \u201dtheir black holes,\u201d David against Goliath. The new knowledge revealed by Telemach on the one hand and the teaching of the better part of a century on the other are pitted against each other. <\/p>\n
The Ch of TelemaCh says, applied to black holes, that any charge eaten by a black hole disappears. Therefore if you put a tiny black hole into the above sack along with the charge, Gauss and Stokes remain valid until you bring the charge close to the black hole and even let it fall down towards its surface. Then the sack becomes totally uncharged by virtue of Telemach, Gauss and Stokes notwithstanding. <\/p>\n
Yet this is so of course only if Telemach is valid \u2014 the vigorous youth brought to life in Michelangelo\u2019s David: \u201cDavid versus Goliath or Telemach versus the suitors at CERN.\u201d The CERNians by their openly ignoring Telemach insist that Penelope \u2013 their beautiful \u201cblack-hole factory LHC\u201d as they call her with affection \u2013 belongs solely to them as their property. Telemach objects along with his father.<\/p>\n
Is the whole world watching breathlessly? Not at all: The suitors \u2014 CERN (forgive me for the indictment before I have clinched the case) \u2014 do not want the world to know that they are in trouble. Even the United Nations Security Council \u2013 located not far from CERN with a sister organization that is honored with an \u201cobserver status\u201d at CERN \u2013 stands firmly on the suitors\u2019 side. Therefore the media of the planet keep strict silence. The fact that on September 10, 2008, more than 500 international newspapers reported on my engagement with CERN is forgotten. <\/p>\n
But suppose Telemach were true \u2013 then the miniblack holes they hope to produce at CERN can, # 1, not even be detected at CERN. And # 2, when eventually a sufficiently slow specimen is formed amongst them, as will unavoidably occur in the long run, it will settle down inside planet earth to grow there exponentially as a mini-mini-quasar, putting the planet\u2019s short-term survival to an end through turning it into a 2-cm black hole in a few years\u2019 time. <\/p>\n
This scenario is \u201cabsolute nonsense\u201d as a scientist at CERN has said \u2013 if Telemach is not true. All I am asking my readers is to find out whether or not the youngster is right. In other words: to put a little bit of time aside so the question can be discussed by the foremost experts. This is all I have ever requested: the benefit of the doubt.<\/p>\n
\u2022 After thus having given you the story, you may be curious for a bit more detail so as if this were a movie and after having watched it the audience could look at some omitted clips. <\/p>\n
I stumbled across Telemach when I followed up \u2013 more diligently than this had been done before, perhaps \u2013 on the 28 years old young Einstein\u2019s \u201chappiest thought\u201d (as he always affectionately called it because it was the breakthrough to his life\u2019s work). <\/p>\n
This had to do with his stomach, of all things. The story is well known among physicists. He was standing in front of the open window in the Swiss patent office in which he was employed, feeling an aching pull from the weight of his stomach after a heavy meal. And for some crazy reason he fleetingly imagined jumping out of the window right away \u2013 to experience in his mind\u2019s eye an instant relief in his stomach. For he realized in a flash that his stomach would cease pulling down on him as soon as he was in free fall. And indeed, anyone in free fall like an astronaut in outer space is weightless in regard to all of his organs as we know today from broadcasts from the International Space Station. In outer space, Einstein knew, the exact laws which apply are the very laws of special relativity discovered by himself two years before. So he realized in a flash that he was empowered to solve the riddle of gravity.<\/p>\n
The first thing he found is signified by the \u201cT\u201d of Telemach: Time and all clocks are slowed down closer to the surface of the earth compared to farther up \u2013 a phenomenon now well known from the operation of the GPS system. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Regarding the other three letters of Telemach, it is easy to see that their variation could NOT be discovered at that time by Einstein or anyone else. But this new result takes a moment to explain if you allow me to try. <\/p>\n
Stemming from this \u201chappiest thought\u201d, the variability of Time (the capital T of Telemach) is universally accepted today. The variability of the other three letters \u2013 L, M, Ch (if Ch is understood as a single letter like Chi in the Greek alphabet) \u2013 is new, as mentioned, the last finding being barely 5 years old. <\/p>\n
Now you will ask me to show you why Ch (charge) is diminished by the same factor by which time is slowed down. For it is this letter Ch on which our survival depends. For although L,M,Ch all radically change the properties of black holes if true, Ch brings in the strongest alteration. While L renders black holes immune to Hawking radiation (which, in spite of its mathematical ingenuity in combining quantum mechanics with pre-Telemach general relativity, eluded physical detection for almost 4 decades), and while M reinforces this fact, Ch in addition renders any successfully produced black hole at CERN opaque to its high-tech detectors \u2013so that their proud announcement of not having found any acquires a bitter taste.<\/p>\n
But I charged ahead too fast with charge, perhaps. My revision of the accepted theory \u2013 the last three consonants of Telemach \u2013 implies that Ch is reduced in proportion to the \u201credshift\u201d (reduction in ticking rate T or frequency) of light that emerges from the bottom of a rocketship, compared to that emanating from an equal source at its tip (or else from the surface of a gravitating body compared to that produced at a higher-up position). The emitted light down in the lower position has a lower frequency, since time T ticks more slowly there. This well-known fact is called \u201credshift\u201d, since red light has a lower frequency in our visible spectrum of colors.<\/p>\n
Now on a black hole, gravity is so strong that the redshift is infinite there, and the energy (mass) of any ascending photon approaches zero, without this fact being noticeable for a hypothetical local, equally slowed-down inhabitant. <\/p>\n
Every material object is transformable into photons locally. So, since physicists like to think concretely, imagine a so-called positronium atom down there which can be \u201cannihilated\u201d into two 511 kilo-electron-Volt gamma photons and vice versa, a familiar transformation. Photon mass and particle mass hence are altered in parallel, if it is true that all local masses are reduced in their mass-energy by the redshift factor of the photons, as we have noted. <\/p>\n
But locally, mass and charge do keep their fixed ratio as we know (since you can release the mass into free fall locally, and immediately it is as if it is in free outer space locally, even though when freshly dropped it is still momentarily indistinguishable from its un-released, equally motionless twin). So the virtually massless (compared to the outside world) positronium atom close to the surface of a black hole is equally virtually charge-less compared to the outer world.<\/p>\n
This is the whole Telemach story put in the form of a logical proof. Sorry, if I went too fast. But if I was not clear enough \u2013 or not right \u2013, this does not matter at this point, because to check on this result is precisely the task of the scientific \u201csafety conference\u201d asked for by the Cologne Administrative Court on January 27, 2011. <\/p>\n
\u2022 So far, not one specialist has stood up to say, \u201cI, the author of XX, contradict the Ch result (or the full Telemach\u201d for that matter). They just refuse to answer, for some unstated reason. Presumably it is because if they did, then my planet-wide pledge to be criticized in a public dialogue or conference \u2014 which CERN abhors \u2014 would be fulfilled on the spot.<\/p>\n
A maximally simple scientific question is waiting to be answered publicly on our planet: Is it true that clocks slowed down in gravity are larger and less massive and less charged? If so then the field lines observed on neutron stars are induced by more charges, although less powerful charges, on their surface than assumed so far. The theory of neutron stars has to be re-written, of all things. And the distance to Andromeda is really longer in terms of light-years, than currently estimated, and not just that one, owing to earthly yardsticks making for somewhat-too-long yard sticks in outer space. And there are some more and deeper implications (new constants of nature) as well. <\/p>\n
By now you can perhaps understand why almost no one has wanted to hear all this so far. Imagine: \u201cGauss and Stokes toppled because of Einstein\u201d more than half a century after his passing away. Almost every specialist is laughing at the idea, ready with a good conscience to die rather than believe such nonsense. But why is their innocent refusal to dialogue unethical? <\/p>\n
Only because time is running out in the face of a huge machine that needs money and public support on a democratic basis dependent on the popular mood. If your credibility can be lowered at any moment, would anyone act any differently in CERN\u2019s place?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I am a \u201cspecialist in non-specialization\u201d, in the words of my late Austrian mentor Konrad Lorenz, and an \u201cinterdisciplinary hybrid\u201d in those of my late American mentor Bob Rosen. IMy work in chaos theory is a little bit well known, in that I discovered a so-called \u201cattractor\u201d or \u201creproducible dynamic phenomenon\u201d familiar in everyday experience [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":145,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2988","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-existential-risks","category-particle-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/145"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2988"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2988\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2988"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2988"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}