{"id":18833,"date":"2015-10-28T03:47:19","date_gmt":"2015-10-28T10:47:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/?p=18833"},"modified":"2015-10-28T03:47:19","modified_gmt":"2015-10-28T10:47:19","slug":"humanity-on-a-budget-or-the-value-added-of-being-human","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2015\/10\/humanity-on-a-budget-or-the-value-added-of-being-human","title":{"rendered":"Humanity on a Budget, or the Value-Added of Being \u2018Human\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

This piece is dedicated to Stefan Stern<\/a>, who picked up on \u2013 and ran with \u2013 a remark I made at this year\u2019s Brain Bar Budapest<\/a>, concerning the need for a \u2018value-added\u2019 account of being \u2018human\u2019 in a world in which there are many drivers towards replacing human labour with ever smarter technologies.<\/p>\n

In what follows, I assume that \u2018human\u2019 can no longer be taken for granted as something that adds value to being-in-the-world. The value needs to be earned, it can\u2019t be just inherited. For example, according to animal rights activists, \u2018value-added\u2019 claims to brand \u2018humanity\u2019 amount to an unjustified privileging of the human life-form, whereas artificial intelligence enthusiasts argue that computers will soon exceed humans at the (\u2018rational\u2019) tasks that we have historically invoked to create distance from animals. I shall be more concerned with the latter threat, as it comes from a more recognizable form of \u2018economistic\u2019 logic.<\/p>\n

Economics makes an interesting but subtle distinction between \u2018price\u2019 and \u2018cost\u2019. Price is what you pay upfront through mutual agreement to the person selling you something. In contrast, cost consists in the resources that you forfeit by virtue of possessing the thing. Of course, the cost of something includes its price, but typically much more \u2013 and much of it experienced only once you\u2019ve come into possession. Thus, we say \u2018hidden cost\u2019 but not \u2018hidden price\u2019. The difference between price and cost is perhaps most vivid when considering large life-defining purchases, such as a house or a car. In these cases, any hidden costs are presumably offset by \u2018benefits\u2019, the things that you originally wanted \u2014 or at least approve after the fact \u2014 that follow from possession.<\/p>\n

Now, think about the difference between saying, \u2018Humanity comes at a price\u2019 and \u2018Humanity comes at a cost\u2019. The first phrase suggests what you need to pay your master to acquire freedom, while the second suggests what you need to suffer as you exercise your freedom. The first position has you standing outside the category of \u2018human\u2019 but wishing to get in \u2013 say, as a prospective resident of a gated community. The second position already identifies you as \u2018human\u2019 but perhaps without having fully realized what you had bargained for. The philosophical movement of Existentialism was launched in the mid-20th century by playing with the irony implied in the idea of \u2018human emancipation\u2019 \u2013 the ease with which the Hell we wish to leave (and hence pay the price) morphs into the Hell we agree to enter (and hence suffer the cost). Thus, our humanity reduces to the leap out of the frying pan of slavery and into the fire of freedom.<\/p>\n

In the 21st century, the difference between the price and cost of humanity is being reinvented in a new key, mainly in response to developments \u2013 real and anticipated \u2013 in artificial intelligence. Today \u2018humanity\u2019 is increasingly a boutique item, a \u2018value-added\u2019 to products and services which would be otherwise rendered, if not by actual machines then by humans trying to match machine-based performance standards. Here optimists see \u2018efficiency gains\u2019 and pessimists \u2018alienated labour\u2019. In either case, \u2018humanity comes at a price\u2019 refers to the relative scarcity of what in the past would have been called \u2018craftsmanship\u2019. As for \u2018humanity comes at a cost\u2019, this alludes to the difficulty of continuing to maintain the relevant markers of the \u2018human\u2019, given both changes to humans themselves and improvements in the mechanical reproduction of those changes.<\/p>\n

Two prospects are in the offing for the value-added of being human: either (1) to be human is to be the original with which no copy can ever be confused, or (2) to be human is to be the fugitive who is always already planning its escape as other beings catch up. In a religious vein, we might speak of these two prospects as constituting an \u2018apophatic anthropology\u2019, that is, a sense of the \u2018human\u2019 the biggest threat to which is that it might be nailed down. This image was originally invoked in medieval Abrahamic theology to characterize the unbounded nature of divine being: God as the namer who cannot be named.<\/p>\n

But in a more secular vein, we can envisage on the horizon two legal regimes, which would allow for the routine demonstration of the \u2018value added\u2019 of being human. In the case of (1), the definition of \u2018human\u2019 might come to be reduced to intellectual property-style priority disputes, whereby value accrues simply by virtue of showing that one is the originator of something of already proven value. In the case of (2), the \u2018human\u2019 might come to define a competitive field in which people routinely try to do something that exceeds the performance standards of non-human entities \u2013 and added value attaches to that achievement.<\/p>\n

Either \u2013 or some combination \u2013 of these legal regimes might work to the satisfaction of those fated to live under them. However, what is long gone is any idea that there is an intrinsic<\/em> \u2018value-added\u2019 to being human. Whatever added value there is, it will need to be fought for tooth and nail.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This piece is dedicated to Stefan Stern, who picked up on \u2013 and ran with \u2013 a remark I made at this year\u2019s Brain Bar Budapest, concerning the need for a \u2018value-added\u2019 account of being \u2018human\u2019 in a world in which there are many drivers towards replacing human labour with ever smarter technologies. In what [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1470,39,20,1759,37,1496,225,31,1500,1966,1501],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automation","category-economics","category-futurism","category-governance","category-human-trajectories","category-law","category-philosophy","category-policy","category-posthumanism","category-theory","category-transhumanism-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18833"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18833\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}