{"id":173165,"date":"2023-09-30T00:30:02","date_gmt":"2023-09-30T05:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2023\/09\/is-consciousness-part-of-the-fabric-of-the-universe"},"modified":"2023-09-30T00:30:02","modified_gmt":"2023-09-30T05:30:02","slug":"is-consciousness-part-of-the-fabric-of-the-universe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2023\/09\/is-consciousness-part-of-the-fabric-of-the-universe","title":{"rendered":"Is Consciousness Part of the Fabric of the Universe?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"aligncenter blog-photo\" href=\"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog.images\/is-consciousness-part-of-the-fabric-of-the-universe3.jpg\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>More than 400 years ago, Galileo showed that many everyday phenomena\u2014such as a ball rolling down an incline or a chandelier gently swinging from a church ceiling\u2014obey precise mathematical laws. For this insight, he is often hailed as the founder of modern science. But Galileo recognized that not everything was amenable to a quantitative approach. Such things as colors, tastes and smells \u201care no more than mere names,\u201d Galileo declared, for \u201cthey reside only in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/what-is-consciousness\/\">consciousness<\/a>.\u201d These qualities aren\u2019t really out there in the world, he asserted, but exist only in the minds of creatures that perceive them. \u201cHence if the living creature were removed,\u201d he wrote, \u201call these qualities would be wiped away and annihilated.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><iframe style=\"display: block; margin: 0 auto; width: 100%; aspect-ratio: 4\/3; object-fit: contain;\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/C5DfnIjZPGw?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope;\n   picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Since Galileo\u2019s time the physical sciences have leaped forward, explaining the workings of the tiniest quarks to the largest galaxy clusters. But explaining things that reside \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/a-25-year-old-bet-about-consciousness-has-finally-been-settled\/\">only in consciousness<\/a>\u201d\u2014the red of a sunset, say, or the bitter taste of a lemon\u2014has proven far more difficult. Neuroscientists have identified a number of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/nrn.2016.22\">neural correlates of consciousness <\/a>\u2014brain states associated with specific mental states\u2014but have not explained how matter forms minds in the first place. As philosopher David Chalmers asked: \u201cHow does the water of the brain turn into the wine of consciousness?\u201d He famously dubbed this quandary the \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=C5DfnIjZPGw\">hard problem<\/a>\u201d of consciousness.<\/p>\n<p>Scholars recently gathered to debate the problem at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., during a two-day <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/view\/panpsychismandpanentheism\/project-events\/marist-workshop?authuser=0\">workshop<\/a> focused on an idea known as <em>panpsychism<\/em>. The concept proposes that consciousness is a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/does-consciousness-pervade-the-universe\/\">fundamental aspect of reality<\/a>, like mass or electrical charge. The idea goes back to antiquity\u2014Plato took it seriously\u2014and has had some prominent supporters over the years, including psychologist William James and philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell. Lately it is seeing renewed interest, especially following the 2019 publication of philosopher Philip Goff\u2019s book <em>Galileo\u2019s Error<\/em>, which argues forcefully for the idea.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>More than 400 years ago, Galileo showed that many everyday phenomena\u2014such as a ball rolling down an incline or a chandelier gently swinging from a church ceiling\u2014obey precise mathematical laws. For this insight, he is often hailed as the founder of modern science. But Galileo recognized that not everything was amenable to a quantitative approach. [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":662,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2229,48,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mathematics","category-particle-physics","category-space"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/662"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}