{"id":124248,"date":"2021-06-25T10:22:33","date_gmt":"2021-06-25T17:22:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2021\/06\/baltimore-spy-plane-program-was-invasion-of-citizens-privacy-court-rules"},"modified":"2021-06-25T10:22:33","modified_gmt":"2021-06-25T17:22:33","slug":"baltimore-spy-plane-program-was-invasion-of-citizens-privacy-court-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2021\/06\/baltimore-spy-plane-program-was-invasion-of-citizens-privacy-court-rules","title":{"rendered":"Baltimore spy plane program was invasion of citizens\u2019 privacy, court rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"aligncenter blog-photo\" href=\"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog.images\/baltimore-spy-plane-program-was-invasion-of-citizens-privacy-court-rules2.jpg\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The AIR program was run by a company called Persistent Surveillance Systems with funding from two Texas billionaires. The city police department admitted to using planes to surveil Baltimore residents in 2016 but approved a six-month pilot program in 2020, which was active until October 31st.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>The city of Baltimore\u2019s spy plane program was unconstitutional, violating the Fourth Amendment protection against illegal search, and law enforcement in the city cannot use any of the data it gathered, <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.vox-cdn.com\/uploads\/chorus_asset\/file\/22680040\/fourth_circuit_decision_baltimore_june_24_2021.pdf\">a court ruled Thursday<\/a>. The Aerial Investigation Research (or AIR) program, which used airplanes and high-resolution cameras to record what was happening in a 32-square-mile part of the city, was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baltimoresun.com\/politics\/bs-md-pol-plane-canceled-20210203-ha3ixtgiyfg4rpgmfftrsd6uwu-story.html\">canceled by the city<\/a> in February.<\/p>\n<p>Local Black activist groups, with support from the ACLU, sued to prevent Baltimore law enforcement from using any of the data it had collected in the time the program was up and running. The city tried to argue the case was moot since the program had been canceled. That didn\u2019t sit well with civil liberties activists. \u201cGovernment agencies have a history of secretly using similar technology for other purposes \u2014 including to surveil Black Lives Matter protests in Baltimore in recent years,\u201d the ACLU said in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/press-releases\/federal-appeals-court-rules-baltimore-aerial-surveillance-program-unconstitutional\">statement<\/a> Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>In an en banc ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit found that \u201cbecause the AIR program enables police to deduce from the whole of individuals\u2019 movements, we hold that accessing its data is a search and its warrantless operation violates the Fourth Amendment.\u201d Chief Judge Roger Gregory wrote that the AIR program \u201cis like a 21st century general search, enabling the police to collect all movements,\u201d and that \u201callowing the police to wield this power unchecked is anathema to the values enshrined in our Fourth Amendment.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The AIR program was run by a company called Persistent Surveillance Systems with funding from two Texas billionaires. The city police department admitted to using planes to surveil Baltimore residents in 2016 but approved a six-month pilot program in 2020, which was active until October 31st. The city of Baltimore\u2019s spy plane program was unconstitutional, [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":621,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1490,1493,1511,1491],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government","category-law-enforcement","category-surveillance","category-transportation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/621"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124248"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124248\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}